WileECoyote

You all know the first one scared the crap out of you, stop trying to be all macho.

@Fallen, I sincerely Apologize, What an unbeleivable mistake I man putting a "The" in front of the title!!!!
His mask was on for like the whole movie. Without facial expression, there is not much to base actig ability on. Again, I do think he is an excellent actor, but to base it on his performance in "Watchmen" is kind of silly. Try using another movie as an example, like aforementioned "little Children" (i didn't capitalize the L, just to see if you want to correct me on that too).

I like how everybody say how great he was in Watchmen. Don't get me wrong, I think he is a great actor, but in the Watchmen, he only basically had to provide his voice, he had a mask on for the entire movie!!!, There was almost no expression required. Oh PS.. The Watchmen sucked.

I swear the the "sort of" wasn't there the first time I read it, but if it was, I apologize.

Swayze was not Howells Brother in Red dawn, he was Charle Sheen Brother. Get your facts straight!!! What kind of crappy writing is this??

Err 2005 - Who cares about original? And it wasn't meant to be funny, I put that cause I didn't want to bother looking up the spelling of his real name. Besides, I cannot take people who speak of drugs so casually serious, so piss off.

Saquin - by saying that you have an opposite view, means you consider me closed minded when it comes to night's movies. IE.. I will hate them no matter what.

This is not true. If they were good movies in my opinion, then I would say I liked them. I just find the style boring. I do not dislike the movies beacuse they were made by Night, but more cause I think they suck. By all means, Like the movies. That's your perogative, but I still have yet to see why Night get's such publicity every time he releases something.

Saquin, you are taking one thing and just calling it something else. And you are wrong, I am actually very open minded. I really wanted to like signs and unbreakable and the villiage for that matter, but I was just bored to death. It might just be his style.

Visionary, coming from a "visionary" I would think you can do better than that.

Unbreakable = Great idea, boring movie.

Signs = Definately one of his worst. There is just no logic in the screenplay.

Not really. I'm pissed because I wasted hours of my life on shamalammadingdongs movies. Hey, you can like them all you want, but it seems like no matter how bad this guy gets, your gonna defend him.

That's what I meant by humping. I do not let critics decide for me. I explicitly stated that I did not like any of Night's movies that I have seen, so I have no reason to think this one will be any better.

Are you humping M. Night?? Now I know this is just opinion, but ALL OF HIS MOVIES SUCK!!!

Sixth Sense - Boring as hell until the end. But whoops, good endings don't make up for a really boring movie.

Unbreakable - More boredom, and the twist is stupid.

Signs - Worst alein movie EVER!!!!! Why would aliens who are hurt by water come to a planet that is 80% water?? Why can't they open a door?? Just plain dumb.

The villiage - M goes back to his boring crap. He took a brilliant idea, and borified it.

Lady in the Water - Complete Sh*t.

Happening - Havn't seen it, but based on all of his other movies, I probably won't bother letting myself be disapointed again.