Annoying guy - Rattled me... eh, no sorry. The only thing I've gotten from this discussion is a laugh. My time here is clearly being wasted. You've failed to answer my question and instead would rather beat around the bush. Quoting the History Channel as back up? Wikipedia, a site that anyone in the world can modify? Are you serious? Thanks for the laugh mate, stick to the graphic designing.

Annoying guy - Stating that you were a scientologist was simply a stab in the dark, I believe, much like your conviction that aliens were responsible for the technological advances of the Mayan. Why do you assume it was aliens? Why not time lords, purple dragons, or leprechauns? Are you privy to some knowledge that the rest of the world isn't? Show me your evidence, that's all I'm asking.

Here is what we have so far: You're defending your argument that human culture may not have developed on its own and you are citing extraterrestrial life as a possible explanation. You are also stating that "recorded history" and "anachronistic advancement in ancient times " is proof of this. This said proof therefore supports the "out of the box" idea that alien intervention is a viable theology.

My question to you again is: where is this proof? Show me these examples in recorded history.

"Also, your other argument is: if something is not commented in a peer reviewed journal, then that something can not exist? If that's true, then all species of animals must not have existed until man discovered them and wrote about them. Only man's collective experience define others' existence."

Actually, I never said that. Once again, I simply asked for proof of your argument. If you want to send me a link to some crackpot website, go ahead. Likely I won't be convinced. But if you show me an example from a peer reviewed journal, chances are I might be more likely to join your side.

"Go surfing...Can you do that?"

Indeed. Provide me with proof, can you do that?

"My well delineated point is that primitive cultures may not have derived wholly on their own. Recorded history and anachronistic advancement in ancient times supports the "out of the box" idea that alien intervention, no matter what the 21st century consensus of your average guy thinks, is a viable theology."
There's only one group of people that peddle that garbage and its Scientologists. Are you a scientologist? Do me a favor: Show me one article in one peer reviewed journal that proposes aliens were responsible for the technological advances of the Mayans, Egyptians, or any other culture OR any article that considers this a 'viable theology' as you put it. ONE ARTICLE FROM ONE PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL. Can you do that?