supermario777

Yeah 2 monsters does make more sense. It answers alot of my questions. That's true the monster that ate Hud i think didn't even have a tail at all. Or if it did then it just wasn't long enough to have destroyed the bridge.

After doing some research I have now come to the conclusion that there are 2 monsters in the movie. I seriously think there are 2 monsters. Here are my reasons for believing there are 2 monsters:

1: A huge tremor shakes New York and then a building in the inner city is destroyed (monster 1) and then the statue of liberties head is then thrown to the ground (monster 2 possibly larger than monster 1).

2: the tail that took down the Manhattan bridge is way too big for the monster that we see eat Hud.

3: did anybody notice that the monster we first see right before they enter the subway didn't have those red lung like things in it's head? And the head was of different shape?

4: The monster we see the jet bombers take down seems very slow and kinda crawls or looks like it's crawling. It takes down the helicopter but the helicopter lands pretty far away from where the monster hit it. Then all of a sudden another monster is already right behind Hud and the others at the crash site.

J.J Abrams did say that the monster is still a baby. But could he be referring to just one monster? Maybe there is a mom and baby monster.

What do you guys think? Fuzion? Film Fiend?

A satellite? Damn i thought it was the monster. Would have been f*cking interesting if it came from outer space so that it would lead to a Voltron movie but f*ck it. So what do you think about a possible story for the second film if they will do a second.

Funny how you didn't answer my questions Fuzion. And as for you Film Fiend, you say baptie6 and I are losers? Look who's also writing comments on this website! You should also get a life since you're still on here commenting back too! Look i hate this movie and so do tons of other people. But! Others actually like. This online bickering ss kinda getting old. So Fuzion and film fiend if you guys like cloverfield then that's your thing. I personally hate the f*cking thing and regret going to see it. If they do make a part 2 then i really wish they don't keep the whole film in first person camera shaky cam other wise I'd hate it all over again. But hey fuzion, do you know anything about the last scene where they said something lands in the water behind Rob and Beth as they are in the ferris wheel?

Fuzion: If you and your friends were getting attacked by a monster and it kills one of your friends who happens to have a camera, would you pick up the damn camera and start filming? or do what a real person would do in that situation and run for their life? think about it f*ck face! this movie was f*ckin stupid! And the girl was f*ckin impaled and she doesnt bleed to death? AND she was able to run and last till next morning without bleeding to death? f*ck that bitch and f*ck you fuzion! great story? what f*ckin story bitch? that was the stupidest story ever! we dont give a sh*t about the characters love lives and their problems! we want to see a f*ckin monster movie! And how the f*ck did he get cell phone signal in the f*ckin subway?!? seriously fuzion your list of why the movie was great is f*ckin stupid. the monster was f*ckin stupid and it looked like smeagol/gollum crawling around new york city looking for his precious! the story was the worst ever! amazing effects...well maybe but the shaky cam kind of clouded that. original? not really buddy. great acting? it wasnt bad.

To mrbigstuffx: I knew the movie was going to be film with a camcorder but for f*cks sake for the audience members they should have just filmed 2o minutes tops of the movie with the first person point of view bullsh*t. A monster movie means tons of running and movement. and do you know what happens when you put that together with a first person super f*ckin shaky camera view? Millions and millions of audience members too f*ckin sick to even watch the whole damn f*ckin film! They could have atleast only kept the camera thing for the party and right at the beginning the monster first appears. The whole movie though was not a good idea to keep first person camera shaky view. The theater i went to was filld with TONS of sick people! how can you say that is a good film? how is it a good movie when 99.9% of the audience members can't even watch the whole damn thing because it made them nauseous? blair witch wasnt this bad with the shaky cam.