Jcurtis

Just throw subtitles up there.

Dear Mex,
I never said that Transformers was good or bad. I simply stated that you are not a film critic. To be critical of a film you have to watch the entire film. (sixth sense for example is an o.k. movie if you dont watch the last 5 minutes, Its those crucial minutes that make the film great.) For you to agree with another post with out seeing the film is just horrible for credibility. Do you always criticize films after only 15 minutes of viewing? By the way I promise I wont throw any more "rocks" at you while your mowing. I'm also gonna spend my 30th in YOUR moms basement ;)
suspending belief.

Mex you make comments and slam a movie you have not even seen. So upon a glance at your profile i see that you state you are a film fan and a film critic. I do believe that any true film critic would watch the movie completely, just to at least give it a chance. I did with Gilli and El Cantante (god gave me strength). Only after, did I blast the movie. For you to pay $10 dollars (or 111 peso what ever is easiest for you), then walk out shows your not even close to a critic, and you supported the film anyway with out viewing it. For you to say in a previous post about pirates 3"..just because you don't like them, it does not mean they are bad films(and vice versa)...so if you don't like them it's your problem. Then have the audacity to criticize another film, one that you have not even seen prove that you think ignorance is bliss. Well I'm here to tell you its not, your just a moron. By the way the premise to the move was giant robots fighting a war on our planet. Anyone who looked at that a said "sounds like a serious art house project" is douche. I think most people understand its a popcorn film and, you have to suspend belief when viewing certain movies. I will now, along with most others, suspend belief when viewing YOUR posts.

When i first read the synopsis i was not impressed. But after seeing the trailer, I cant wait.

cant wait. give me more now

Dumb. Stupid. Retarded. Moronic. I wouldnt think about watching it. So with all that said, It will probably stick around for years, and fans will love it...blaaahh blahh blahh.

I am actually glad to see a remake. I hope that he retains his original vision. That movie scarred the crap out of me when i was little. I loved it and i now am a proud owner of it on DVD!

More GAGs!. As soon as they fix the series, and start to make it respectable again, they want more gags. It doesn't need more gags. Thats a crappy excuse for a lame script I bet.

I have multiple devices connected to my LAN. I agree, I don't think the PC should hold a monopoly, I just simply think that company's need to be more honest to the customers willing to pony up the cash for a relatively expensive piece of hardware. There is to much spin coming from HD-DVD's camp its ridiculous. How does a device that connects to the Internet maintain a place in the "dedicated player" category? It doesn't. I'm all for them giving the consumers the most features for our money, but to blatantly exclude a competitors statistics because its blu-ray player does more than your HD-DVD player is a bit childish. If they are so worried about this "PS3" stat, why didn't Micro$oft put its HD-DVD IN its XBOX 360? They said they didn't want to include the HD-DVD inside the 360 because they wanted the customer to choose if they wanted one. Thats nice! It looks like the customer's did choose, just not the option micro$oft was wanting. Now they lie to get us to purchase one. They should have just forced it on us like Sony did and they would be leading the "war"! Just count every Blu-ray players and HD-DVD player, it doesn't matter if its built into your refrigerator or PS3, I don't care if its used for viewing hi def movies out of the end of a garden hose, JUST COUNT EM ALL! I'm curious what they are going to say in response to PS3 sales, that will inevitably be boosted by the $100 price cut. I find this whole thing amusing, to say the least that a video game will more than likely determine the outcome of HD-DVD Vs Blu-Ray Battle Royal!

It seems to me that HD-DVD is doing all it can just to stay in the headlines. Why do I need a DVD player that can connect to the internet? I have a pc and so does anybody else that has the internet. Why didn't they include the trailers on the disc to begin with? Oh wait I have the answer, not enough disc storage. If I want to re-edit a movie I will use my "pc" not a DVD player. I want a format doing what it can to stay relevant, not giving me something to do while it's being rendered obsolete. How about more studio support. These announcements are about as pointless as a eject button on the remote, you still have to get up to put another disc in! What's with the "spin" HD-DVD is doing to the number of DVD players? They are only counting dedicated Players. How is a player that connects to the internet "dedicated" strictly to DVD, but PS3 is not considered one. That sounds like a double standard. Even when they spin the numbers they still can't get the facts right. Somebody needs to Get HD-DVD camps head out of the clouds and slap them back to reality on the way down. Total numbers are more staggering when you count total players, something like 1.5m blu-ray to HD-DVD's 150,000. Also if I do recall, The PS2 was one of the driving factors of the success of the DVD in general. Any body that has the audacity to say that people are only paying $600 for a game console, and are only using the Blu-ray player for movies until more games are released, is very naive. That was one of the biggest selling points and reasons people purchased 1.5+ million of them.