Post on ejk1's Wall
Share
@richgamer150 Aww...did I upset you? Perhaps you should pay attention to the story before aimlessly commenting. Have a great night, and thanks for the amusement :)
@richgamer150 Correct. But the poster is for the Australian theaters. Were you not paying attention to that fact?
This is not a big deal. It was for Australia, not the US. If people are going to associate a poster of four ninja turtles with a building exploding in the background with an actual tragedy, that is on that person. Stay home if you can't separate fantasy from reality...
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Comic-Con: Wesley Snipes Wants Blade 4 to Happen
He made life horrible for Reynolds and Biel during filming. I'm not sure Marvel should give him another chance.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Warner Bros. Picks Up Arabian Nights 7-Movie Franchise
I would love to see this done as faithfully as possible.
Notice that they didn't actually give ASM3 a set date, only a year. Why? Likely because they have no idea where they are taking the story after Sinister Six, and want to stay flexible.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Robert Downey Jr. Optimistic About Iron Man 4 Return
Really? You mean he'd come back if offered the right amount of money? So his earlier statements were basically just a negotiating tactic? Wow, I wonder if anyone saw that coming? Wait a second, I did. I saw that coming.
Same powers as Superman? Clearly, he's playing Bizarro :P
Love this.
Regarding Steve Moore, too bad, so not sad. You sign a contract, you make sure you have a copy of what you signed. He said he "dug out" a contract, meaning he had a copy but didn't pay any attention to it. Like Alan Moore and many others, Steve didn't pay attention to what he signed, allegedly received a different contract than what he signed, and didn't immediately notice it until it was virtually unprovable. He had no one to blame but himself.
"Iconic" literary character? Standards are very low nowadays...
As long as the quality remains high, I don't care when the films take place.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item An X-Men Vs. Justice League Movie Could Happen Soon
THINK ABOUT IT GUYS!!! WE'LL GET TO SEE QUICKSILVER (WELL, FOX'S VERSION, ANYWAYS) VS. FLASH!!!! WOLVERINE VS. BATMAN!!!!! THE PHOENIX VS. SUPERMAN!!!!!! APOCALYPSE THROWING DOWN WITH DARKSEID!!!!!!!!!! ISN'T THAT AWESOME??!!!!

Bullsh*t. Neither side wants this. Does anyone really think DC or Marvel will risk its respective characters to look inferior to its opposite? Lawsuits and injunctions will arrive faster that Quicksilver or Flash could ever hope of being.
@shuabert But it's not even new. Loki was in female form just a few years ago. This is Marvel basically raising the white flag on creativity with the female characters they AREN'T spotlighting.
I guess it's nice to give others a chance, but the saying, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it," was made for situations like this one. Regardless, good luck, newbies...
Eva Green. Little clothing. That's a winning combination...
@TheNarrator I am glad to see you my friend, but I must correct one thing. For the past two years or so, Carol Danvers has been Captain Marvel. Miss Marvel is now a Muslim girl. Both books are getting positive reviews, which just begs the question, "why go through with this Thor nonsense?"
I can't help but think that they're just saying things just to piss people off...
This is so lame. When you combine this with the fact that Marvel featured Sif in Journey Into Mystery in 2013, and could not get anyone to buy, just shows that they cannot, or are not attempting to branch out. Instead of trying to cultivate a new character or build up a preexisting female lead, they are going to risk losing big money on one of their top sellers. Marvel is clearly hoping the sales here are similar to the last big stunt character change, Superior Spider-Man. Will this be as successful as SSM? More so? Less so? I guess we'll find out starting in October, but I have a feeling by October of 2015, the status quo will change once more...
@Agent-Cooper I'm not questioning your comment, dumbass, so I don't have to pay attention to whatever lousy point you're trying to make. However, since it's my quote that you're taking issue with, you should, and still haven't, tried to address my full quote. But nice try at deflecting from the fact that you 1) didn't address the Sinister Six aspect of my comment, most likely because 2) you have no intelligent answer to that part of my comment. Thanks for being somewhat amusing...