Post on ejk1's Wall
Share
That she's not Japanese is not a big deal for this property. Kusanagi's in a cybernetic body, not a human flesh.
I said Sandman wasn't a DCU film months ago, on this website. Anyone that read the books probably realized the same thing.
Thing is, Keaton is old enough to pull off a live-action version of The Dark Knight Returns. He could also pull off being Old Bruce Wayne in a Batman Beyond film.
Judi Dench, Maggie Smith, Whoopi Goldberg, and Cate Blanchett. There. Your new Ghostbusters...
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Suicide Squad Movie Rumor Reveals a 7 Villain Lineup
Deadshot and Boomer should always be on the team.
Good. Brainiac is a top shelf villain.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Joaquin Phoenix Passes on Marvel's Doctor Strange
If he wasn't interested, fine. But if it comes down to the fact that he wasn't sure he could pull off a green-screen film, then there is only one word to describe him: Coward.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Robert Downey Jr. Teases Possible Return in Iron Man 4
@shuabert He's in total control here. One, he's the star of the only billion dollar franchise Marvel has, not including the Avengers team up films. While some people think Marvel can replace him, the fact is that he's a sure bet while another actor is an uncertainty. Second, age is not really a factor, and may not be for a good long while. If Downey can keep himself in reasonable shape, he can go a few more films. A stuntman can easily do the "Iron Man in action" scenes, leaving RDJ to be Stark.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Robert Downey Jr. Teases Possible Return in Iron Man 4
I've said all along, everything he is saying, either way, is nothing more than negotiating tactics. No reason to change my tune...
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Will Avengers 3 Be a Two-Part Movie?
The Infinity Gauntlet, the story that Marvel seems to be heading towards adapting, could easily support two films, so I'm fine with this possibility.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Deadpool Will Be Rated PG-13 Instead of R
@aryaza MW has been censoring comments for a few years now. Just because you're new doesn't excuse your ignorance.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Deadpool Will Be Rated PG-13 Instead of R
@Ben-Saul-Wilkin Your argument is flawed because neither Kick-Ass or Watchmen pulled in big bucks. Additionally, those properties aren't "big house" characters. Deadpool is, and that means there is an added pressure for the film to perform big. In order to do that, they need as big an audience as possible.

As much as some of you don't like it, money makes the Hollywood world go round. FOX is only taking this project on because of the success of the last three X-Men oriented films. It has given FOX confidence that a Deadpool film may be a profitable entity, and if it becomes a big hit, they may have a new franchise. In short, X-Men's financial success has paved the way. Without that, there is no way this film would be made, and frankly no reason for them to do it. If you don't like the product they put out, you don't have to see it. Hell, why don't you just make your own damn film. I'm sure you all have $100-150 million lying around somewhere to get this thing rolling.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Deadpool Movie Officially Gets 2016 Release!
@thedude1 Right, but 1) there's a first time for everything, and 2) I think it's a smart move. It would get crushed going directly against BvS or Cap 3. Furthermore, FOX will likely be placing X-Men: Apocalypse sometime in the middle of summer 2016, either June or July. So, putting Deadpool in the middle of three strong entities would likely get it lost in the shuffle.

Additionally, aside from fans of the character, there isn't much of an outcry for this film. Putting out in February may mean that there is less pressure. It's not getting tentpole treatment, and therefore it's expectations are lower. If it exceeds those expectations, good things may spring forward.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Deadpool Movie Officially Gets 2016 Release!
@thedude1 Normally, I'd agree with you about February being a dead month, but 2016 is a different case. BvS is being released in March, Cap 3 in May, so it stands to reason that if FOX wants to make some money off of Deadpool, putting him before those films seems like a better idea. Don't let it get lost in the shuffle, or suffer from summertime movie fatigue.

As for Reynolds, maybe this time he'll star in a cbm that doesn't suck (although admittedly, the failures of GL, X:Men: Wolverine, and Blade Trinity cannot be laid at his feet).
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Avengers 2 Official Story Details Released!
@themoviefanatic Which told us nothing we didn't already know.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Avengers 2 Official Story Details Released!
That told us nothing new...
Will Deathstroke be in this? Will Starfire will given the sex bomb treatment? Will the budget be high enough to accommodate Beast Boy and Raven's special effects? I look forward to the answers to these questions...
@Brizzy Notice first that I said he has nothing else going on. That can be taken a few ways. Second, I mentioned not only critical, but also commercial reception for his films, which I guess you failed to comprehend. To make it very clear to you:

Aside from being Legolas and Will Turner, Bloom hasn't seen much Hollywood success, if any. So yeah, he has nothing else going on. Not my fault you made an assumption.
ejk1 wrote a comment about the news item Will Drax Play a Significant Role in Avengers 3?
@raoulduke33 That's usually been Drax The Destroyer's goal.

As for Dave, I'm happy for his success. He made many people, both here on MW and elsewhere, eat a lot of crow. The WWE missed out by not positioning him to face Brock Lesnar.
@Brizzy Do some research on some of those films, including critical reception and box office numbers, and then get back to me...