Jamie Sandifer

hmm, reading another comment, it would actually be completely lame to have yet another family member of Billy come after Sid, especially since this will be like 3 movies later... lol but I still stand by a daughter or wife of Roman being the killer in Scream 5. Roman was an actor! He could have had a family no one else knew about; Maureen Prescott did! or they could have found out, doesnt mean Sid had to be notified of that... Just throwing random ideas out there... lol Kirby was awesome and I didn't realize they meant to leave that open (or just noticed they did..) but I don't think she would have a strong motive, other than Sid being the "cause" of her getting involved. I am pretty sure that her cousin was never shot in the head..Just watched that.. maybe I just didn't catch that. But I'd rather yall not bring her back. But I'd still watch lmao! I do not think that the main characters should be killed off! And I def don't think Sid's character should be turned bad. Like another person mentioned, that would ruin the whole thing! Why would SHE turn around and do to others what was done to her. Makes absolutely no sense. and for Dewey to follow.. it wouldn't fit...That's just my opinion on the whole thing. I trust the makers of Scream will surprise us all! They always do! :) Oh and may I point out that the "theme song" of Scream DID NOT play in the 4th??!!!! That was just odd to me! (Red Right Hand). That is the signature music of these movies haha why not?!

I REALLY hope there is a 5th one! I LOVE the Scream movies. The 4th one was a LITTLE weak to me, but I still thought it was a great. The comedy from Courteny Cox was AWESOME! She was such a smart@$$! HAHA loved it! The killer was what I found weak. It was a stupid motive! I definitely think they need to backtrack some as far as the killer goes. I have only read a few comments and saw some that mention stu. He WAS the only one who was not actually shot in the head...I mean, he COULD survive being electricuted, I guess...? lol more so than a shot to the head, although that has said to not be true so idk...BUT Stu didn't have the motive to kill Sid! Billy did, and Stu just kinda...joined...And then in the 2nd, Billy's mom had the real motive, and Mickey just kinda joined.. I LOVE LOVE LOOOOVVVEEE how they tied ALL that together in the 3rd one! Made SO much sense. B/c when the 3rd was coming out I was thinking mannnn how many ppl wanna kill this chic haha That's kinda what I thought when the 4th came out, and the killer did not impress me, but still love the movie and still recommend it. I know a lot of ppl think differently about it. I think they need to bring back a connection from one of the first 3 movies.. like Billy's dad... (who maybe had an influence on the killer in the 4th, someone who made a point to bring up Sid that made the killer finally flip, and then he comes since that killer didn't finish it...?) Something along that line...or Roman could have had a wife or something like that... maybe a daughter around the killer's age from the 4th..? That could be an interesting twist...? Enough of the "movies are to blame" motives. That's just lame. Give us some REAL motives!!!! I am SO looking forward to another Scream!! AAAHHHH! LOVE them!!