Although it took time to except, the old Two and a half men we knew of the Charlie era is officially over, but is this really a bad thing?
  • OVERALL
    3.0
    WORTHY
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Replay Value
This season was really about establishing one thing, Charlie's gone, Aston's in, a simple replacement right? I don't think the writers saw how big an effect Walton's (Aston Kutcher's) beginning would have on the show. Basically, let's be honest, before season 9 the show revolved around Charlie Sheen's character, suddenly Charlie's gone. And I would say it wasn't that big a deal that Charlie left but the sad fact is it was, and I would say the show wasn't as good as it used to be, but it was, in fact better. The situation was heating up, Alan was set to leave to move into new girlfriend Lindsay's house, but he cheats on her with his ex girlfriend and burns the house down causing him to move back with Charlie. He goes back and forth and Alan becomes more and more pathetic and Charlie becomes less and less sympathetic but it was incredibly funny and truly highlighted the love-hate relationship between the two brothers.

Suddenly Charlie is wiped off the show completely and the worst possible time and Walden Schmidt is written in. Of course as a long term fan I am hesitant to this 'new guy' and want to hate him. But I have to say Aston Kutcher does a pretty damn good job and he is almost impossible not to like. After the first episode I am satisfied Two and a Half Men is as good as it was. Unfortunately a few episodes in a start to not enjoy it so much, the characters are there, the jokes are there but there is just no spark. Charlie's character was a great screen presence because he was not nice, but very loveable; he was sleazy, but let's be honest it's a pretty sleazy show.

Now we have Walden Schmidt, an incredibly nice, warm, likeable character, and these new characters that come with him. By the end of the series he's established a family of which the mum and the daughter are very likeable characters. But watching the second to last episode I realised something terrible had happened, slowly and subtly throughout the season, Alan had become the new Charlie. And I don't mean that episode where he goes insane and they lock him up I mean Alan had become the bad guy after so many years of being the good brother.

The joke was Alan was going to stay with Charlie forever, much to Charlie's annoyance but all the while secretly knowing he can't live without him. But this worked, he could be a sponge to his brother, but now he's just the sponge to some guy. He has almost lost all of his likeability due to his cheapness and selfishness that the only time we could ever see the good in him was when he was being a father to the less and less prominent and more and more stoned Jake. It was that 'good father' aspect of the character that gave him meaning for all his cheap, sponginess (a credit to Jon Cryer's excellent ability to play the realistic struggling single parent). But now Jake's joined the army, sad but necessary, and you take away the kid, what is he now? What is the point of Alan Harper?

So it is still funny, it does still have its jokes and is still likeable. But it's too likeable, the sleaze is long gone and the characters that came with the sleaze are slowly fading. But, Alan's still gripping on to that guest room by his fingertips; he won't go without a fight.

Do you like this review?

Comments (1)

  1. Zak Lee Ferguson

    I notived that about Alan, but i think it works to the shows benefit @stoned as Alan has these very sly streaks and they will come across quite brash due to the problem that is the form of Walden, a very muchly overt heightened HAPPY presense.....

    3 months agoby @Zak-Lee-FergusonFlag