'Star Trek Into Darkness' Official Synopsis Revealed!

J.J. Abrams' sci-fi sequel hits theaters May 17, 2013 and stars Chris Pine, John Cho, Zachary Quinto and Zoe Saldana.

Star Trek Into Darkness official synopsis revealed
Star Trek Into Darkness official synopsis revealed
Paramount Pictures has revealed the official synopsis for J.J. Abrams' sci-fi sequel Star Trek Into Darkness. Take a look.

"When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis.

With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction.

As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew."

Star Trek Into Darkness was released May 17th, 2013 and stars Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho, Benedict Cumberbatch, Anton Yelchin. The film is directed by J.J. Abrams.



Sources: Paramount Pictures

Share this story yet?

0 0 0 0 0

RELATED STORIES

BEST OF THE WEB

Comments (43)

  1. Rudy

    I'm getting a Eugenics Wars vibe to this. But I could be wrong.

    2 years agoby @rudyFlag

  2. skywise

    I am really excited to see this but really, that sounds terribly generic. I know they cant be too revealing at this point though.

    2 years agoby @skywiseFlag

  3. Josh

    One thing that made Abrams' film work so well was that the stakes were high. This one looks to make them even higher. I am really excited for this.

    2 years agoby @shuabertFlag

  4. Sean

    @moviemaniac66 Yes, it certainly does.

    2 years agoby @themoviefanaticFlag

  5. the MovieGhost

    @narrator Well that's definitely understandable. I haven't seen the first movie in quite a while (funny story, Kirk's test scene sparked a new-found apple-eating phase in me :P) so I can't really recall the particulars of it. But I'm sure it'll be similar to the first outing.

    2 years agoby @the-movieghostFlag

  6. MovieManiac

    Sounds intense.

    2 years agoby @moviemaniac66Flag

  7. Rodney Roover

    @Lutz I think that would be Awesome! Star Trek War Z!

    2 years agoby @Rodney-RooverFlag

  8. Rodney Roover

    Nice so its going to follow the storyline to every other Star Trek film ever created.....

    2 years agoby @Rodney-RooverFlag

  9. Ghostman

    Anyone think Gary Mitchell will have a pivotal role in this as the "force of terror from within their own organization"?

    2 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  10. Nicholaus XX

    @ghostman -- I wasn't referring to his past films, but the last Star Trek. But, now that I think about it, his films are, too. That's not entirely bad, though.

    2 years agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag

  11. SherlockHolmes2009

    So f*cking excited for this one, hope its just as good as the 1st one and better; Oh an before I forget Welcome back @mcleve02

    2 years agoby @SherlockHolmes2009Flag

  12. Dan

    @narrator I agree with you, but I'm sure we'll be dazzled by the lens flare to not notice the cliches.

    (actually, I always dig on Abrams movies, flaws n all)

    2 years agoby @dan1Flag

  13. the Narrator

    Lol, @the-movieghost. I knew I was going to be called on my comment the second it was posted. It might as well be by you. Don't misunderstand me now. I don't expect a whole lot from this film, aside from excellent entertainment value and a few nerdgasm moments, much like it's predecessor. Rather, it was the way they worded this summary that made it sound all "meh" to me. Particularly the last paragraph - that's practically the summary of almost every generic adventure/action film out there (sans the Kirk part).

    2 years agoby @narratorFlag

  14. Eddie Lutz

    Star Trek Z: Where no zombie apocalypse has gone before.

    2 years agoby @LutzFlag

  15. ridgl

    One Man WMD sounds interesting, if he can, by himself, destroy thousands of people. I hope its not another Red Matter situation.

    2 years agoby @ridglFlag

  16. THE JOKER

    @XxNickTheFilmCriticXx This is true, as I have been that individual for a few years before you joined the site... lol

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  17. Nicholaus XX

    @bawnian-dexeus -- Guess so, as I've never said the aforementioned to someone on this site. Thought that alone would be substantiated proof of a joke.

    @mcleve02 -- Or you have a better reputation. ;P

    2 years agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag

  18. THE JOKER

    @XxNickTheFilmCriticXx Maybe you're just not as good at it as me! :P

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  19. Nicholaus XX

    @mcleve02@bawnian-dexeus@the-movieghost -- "haha I told you I would return soon! Let the random dickhe*d comments return!!!". That was my way of adding onto the parody; by providing random, rude comments. How did you guys not get that?

    2 years agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag

  20. THE JOKER

    @bawnian-dexeus Sorry man... it may have been! I will do my best to be around more often again

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  21. THE JOKER

    @bawnian-dexeus It's what movieweb has been missing for the last month and a half!

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  22. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    @mcleve02 Well, you certainly brought your humor back :p

    2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  23. Ghostman

    @XxNickTheFilmCriticXx Seriously? Have you seen any of Abrams' films? They are nothing shirt of "cliched" or "predictable."

    2 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  24. THE JOKER

    @the-movieghost haha yes sir!

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  25. THE JOKER

    @XxNickTheFilmCriticXx Exactly why am I a dickwad?

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  26. THE JOKER

    @bawnian-dexeus And they make a Star Trek baby together named Kock?

    2 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  27. Writer220

    interesting

    2 years agoby @writer220Flag