Second ‘The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence)’ Poster

Tom Six returns to direct this sequel about a deranged man obsessed with the first film, in select theaters today, October 7th.

Sources: IFC Films

Share this story yet?

0 0 0 0 0


Comments (47)

  1. ROFLitschristian

    @ghostman Haha. That one would deserve the "sick" quote.

    3 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  2. slysnide

    @ghostman: Agreed 100% to the millionth power.

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  3. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    @ghostman Symbolical wise, we already are.

    3 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  4. Ghostman


    Let's hop we don't see the male version of this poster ;)

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  5. slysnide

    @ghostman: idkyi just didn't scroll down the page. :P

    [I like that I was lazy enough to substitute 3 words with 3 letters, with 2 single letter words thrown in, though this sentence explaining it rules out the laziness factor]

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  6. slysnide

    @bawnian-dexeus: No, somehow I got this Robert Mapplethorpe photo into the conversation, and we debated that since it was of a nude minor that how it could be publicly distributed without being considered child porn, despite the parents and kid gave complete consent, as regardless of the context, if a pedophile or registered child sex offender had copies of the photos for their pleasure, they could technically be considered child porn. But then I forgot who the photographer was and that caused the debate to lengthen as I couldn't look up the answer to this debate, and when I did remember him I still couldn't find the answer.

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  7. Ghostman

    @slysnide About 3 hours ago i mentioned to @bawnian-dexeus if for some reason they used a child to create this poster would it be child pornography, and then you started talking about this guy who took pics of naked little boys, and only nude men..then died of AIDS. Soon, conspiracy struck to theorize that the man (who's name is Robert) was doing something 'fishy' on those photograph sets....Nirvana showed up and I thought to myself "Smells like Teen Spirit" haha :D

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  8. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    Wait are we still debating if this body belongs to a child? O.o

    3 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  9. Replicant

    I feel completely indifferent to this poster beside the fact that I wonder how "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo" poster got censored for a nipple and how this is almost a vagina in your face.
    Not complaining though

    3 years agoby @felipe-11Flag

  10. slysnide

    @ghostman: How the hell did I stumble onto that subject in this article? :P

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  11. ROFLitschristian

    @ghostman Oh thanks for noticing. I didn't think anyone really read my 3! comments. :P

    3 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  12. ROFLitschristian

    @ghostman I think what @slysnide is trying to say is that if it's used in a legal sense, it's okay? Like Nirvana's album cover to Nevermind.

    3 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  13. Ghostman

    @slysnide Good idea about filming friends reactions! Actually, this has been the longest convo we'd had on here :) But I'm sure I'll remind you about it tomorrow, and about that AIDS thing..who knows, maybe he WAS doing something behind the curtains when taking photos ;)

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  14. slysnide

    @ghostman: I got it. It was Robert Mapplethorpe. A photographer who made B&W portraits of nude guys and died of AIDS in '89, except the kid I mentioned wasn't 14, maybe half that. Still no data on how that's legal, but I'll figure it out eventually or forget about this conversation by tomorrow morning. :P [I guess that's a good reason to watch it, as long as you got a camcorder to post their reactions online-:P]

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  15. Ghostman

    @slysnide Yep, it is. I guess it's that sick, ;) I've been waiting to see this movie ever since I saw the first one, not that I'm sadistic, it's just you know, to have a good time watching it with friends at a party to see who gets sick first lol!

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  16. slysnide

    @ghostman: Oh ha ha. :P Is that guy pictured in the centipede story on the far left holding a puke bucket?

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  17. Ghostman

    @slysnide Haha! you said "this is gonna 'bug' me now" XD

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  18. slysnide

    @ghostman: Most definitely, but publicly distributing the photos I'd think would be illegal. This would be so much easier if I could just recall the photographer's name. I'm gonna google famous photographers and see if any names ring bells so I can get to the bottom of this, cause this is gonna bug me now.

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  19. Ghostman

    @slysnide I'm sure the child's parents were there with him, and the photographer had to get written/signed permission to take nude photos of an under-aged person right?

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  20. slysnide

    @ghostman: Context is irrelevant when dealing with minors. Kept in a private setting sure, but for the artist to make bank showcasing the photo seems really sketchy. There had to be something else to it. I know the picture, can picture it right now, and in the few legal courses I've taken I can't imagine how he got away with that, as regardless of the photographer's intentions, if someone was jacking off to copies of those photos they'd be charged with possession of child porn rather than for getting horny over a photo.

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  21. Ghostman

    @slysnide That's just an art class though, I'm sure the photo was presented as art, and in no means shown in a pornographic nature. I like @ROFLitschristian 's idea of having a bare back female with a super-imposed centipede 'spin' that would be cool to see!

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  22. ROFLitschristian

    @bawnian-dexeus@ghostman@slysnide Child vaginas or not, this movie will still be awful.

    3 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  23. slysnide

    @ghostman: Ideally yes, but not necessarily. There was a famous photographer--can't recall his name--who had a 14yr old boy pose nude standing atop an armchair. It was shown to students in a class as part of a slideshow, and no pornography charges were mentioned. I'm sure the instructor for the Art Appreciation course would've mentioned something about it as I recall not all students being comfortable with the photo. Not to mention it wouldn't be shown in a classroom setting on a slide show about "fine art" if it were classified as child pornography.

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  24. Ghostman

    @bawnian-dexeus Well, what if they used a kid? wouldn't that be considered child pornography?

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  25. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    @ghostman Only you would point that out.

    3 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  26. Ghostman

    @bawnian-dexeus@ROFLitschristian You do have to admit, that's a tiny vagina :/

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  27. slysnide

    @SpeedyEric: THANK YOU. I don't get the obsession with such bullsh*t either. They should spend their undeserved production budget on making something original for a change. Or better, something actually scary rather than the same repulsive & recycled idea which has already been DONE TO DEATH A MILLION TIMES and then some. I bet you & I could make something better, just pitch a better idea right here than this crap. And it's a SEQUEL no less!!! To be followed by a confirmed third and final installment. Based on the wikipedia synopsis, I don't see what else they can do to "top" themselves as they're under the delusion of thinking that's what they're achieving here. This sh*t is just as much of a pathetic attempt at a horror film as the original "Blair Witch" (1999), except that at least TRIED to do something, but failed miserably--See that's the first time I've given "Blair Witch" credit for anything, so the contrasting film has to be pretty terrible to earn that merit.

    3 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  28. ROFLitschristian

    @bawnian-dexeus Fitting? Yes. Stupid? Also yes.

    3 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  29. Ghostman

    @kguy ::Cleans up bloody mess on wall::

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

From The Web