Turn Advertising Off
 
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

TERMINATOR SALVATION (2009)

"McG manages to salvage something impressive from the depths of screenplay hell. It's not perfect, but it's a damn good movie that should give McG some new found respect and rocket Sam Worthington to super stardom."

Terminator Salvation is a movie that Terminator fans were/are on the fence about. From the very beginning, lines have been drawn like the war that the film captures: fans who have been waiting for this movie for 24 years, and fans who think it's not necessary, devoting themselves to James Cameron's vision and his vision alone. Whatever your reason for wanting or not wanting to see this movie, it's here, even after going through some tough obstacles. From day one, fans were hesitant towards the choice of director in the form of McG. Who can blame them? The guy's name sounds like something on a fast food menu and he directed the Charlie's Angels flicks...not exactly the perfect resume to land him a gig on reviving Terminator. Then there's the multiple screenplay revisions done for the film. McG and star Christian Bale reportedly worked "day and night" revising the script after they concluded Bale's part was not big enough. When the ending was leaked online, yet another script change was done on the film's finale. And who can forget Bale's rant on the set of the movie...no one, that's who. A small obstacle, one that shouldn't effect it one bit...but still an obstacle in this day and age of political correctness and swarming paparazzi. Even after all this, the film was released with a sturdy summer date...and I loved it.

Terminator Salvation's story is the main reason for so much fan hysteria. Is it necessary? Is it done well? For me, the answer to both of those questions is 'yes.' The flick takes place in the year 2018. Skynet is quickly ridding Earth of humanity with its army of machines, and small pockets of resistance across the globe remain ready to fight, hanging on the words of John Connor(Bale). Connor is devoted to the destruction of Skynet and the rescue of his father, Kyle Reese(Anton Yelchin), relying on his mother's audio tapes for inspiration. When a stranger from the past arrives in the future named Marcus Wright(Sam Worthington), whose last memory is being on death row and signing his body over to science, the future he has come to accept suddenly changes, and both Connor and Wright must discover themselves before rescuing others.

What TS manages to do is make a new story out of an old one. The war between humans and machines is a dangling mistletoe over the first Terminator trilogy, but no one has ever really stepped under it until now. That first trilogy basically had the same plot outline for all 3 films-Arnold comes and kills a lot of people. That's awesome...it's not called Terminator for nothing. Great films, too(not so much the third), but this is what they were naturally leading up to. I'm not saying Terminator Salvation can be ranked as high as the first two films, but damn it, it's a great movie and definitely deserves more recognition than it's getting. I'll admit, it had me worried at first. The beginning is kind of annoying. Lots of people yelling orders in funny accents that you don't care about...then they're all killed. That's when the movie starts hitting the right nails and tunes in on the right frequency. It becomes not so much a roller-coaster ride like Star Trek or like Transformers 2 will be this summer I'm sure, but a smaller amusement park ride...go-karts, maybe?

It's not balls to the wall action is what I'm saying. There's lots of human moments in a film about a machine war. They're not emotional, thought-provoking experiences, but they further the story. McG's direction isn't state of the art, either. He offers lots of close ups and standard camera shots-old school, if you will...but when the action comes, and McG pulls away the camera to reveal the entirety of his vision, it hits hard. It's loud and shaky at times, but I think it's the simple fact that it's simple directing that gets the job done. McG doesn't include more action than what's needed and he seems to have the knack for focusing on those shots that need focusing in this movie. He includes many phrases and moments from the first trilogy that fans will recognize, but the film still feels like the beginning of something different, and I feel that's in large part due to the introduction of Marcus Wright, who wasn't going to have as much screen time in the original story. Wright, while being a machine, is someone that the audience can relate to. He is a man out of his time, searching for WHAT he's become and discovers WHO he is in the process. Sam Worthington makes Marcus the stand-out character. I wasn't familiar with the Australian actor before this movie, but it seems to have propelled him to stardom, with roles in the upcoming films like Avatar(ironically directed by Cameron) and the Clash of the Titans remake. He's on my watch list and is sure to become a new favorite to movie goers. He has a Heath Ledger-esque quality to him-Aussie actor who stays out of the lime light, but still stands out in the film he's in. Hopefully that continues and he evolves as an actor, and hopefully the writers of the next film can develop a character just as likable as Marcus.

Worthington even outshines Bale in my eyes. Bale is a great actor and he makes a good John Connor, but Wright's character steals the show. Bale's take on John Connor is battered but not beaten, a war hero that all look up to, as he is supposed to be portrayed. He talks with a downgraded Batman voice, but he kicks ass and takes names...and yells a lot. Still, he was committed to the project, and it shows. Anton Yelchin, like Worthington, is becoming a favorite to a lot of moviegoers, but Yelchin had a head start with Star Trek. He portrays Kyle Reese efficiently. Looking at the guy, you wouldn't believe he'd be so good at being an action hero, but he manages to stand up to the likes of Christian Bale and even Common, who's done plenty of shoot-em up action flicks in his short acting career. The rest of the cast doesn't exactly each get a moment to shine, but fill their roles. Bryce Dallas Howard is Connor's wife, Kate; Common is Barnes, the resident black tough guy; and Moon Bloodgood is Blair Williams, a woman in Connor's resistance who takes a liking to Marcus. These characters aren't the highlight and don't get enough screen time to really comment on their acting abilities, except to say "average." It's Connor, Wright, and Reese's story, though. They are the main characters that can change the course of the future forever, and they get the deserved attention.

In the end, Terminator Salvation is a solid film. I was anticipating it and I wasn't disappointed. Can I say I liked it better than Star Trek? I believe I can. It's adventurous and the epic climax that seems to be required by every major summer film thus far is riveting. It's a Terminator-gasm as Connor and Wright fight against Arnold...wait, what was that? Yes, Arnold does "show up", and it's done surprisingly well. I didn't care if he made a cameo, but in the context of how he did, it's great. Along with creating realistic and unique robots, the effects department manages to CGI his face on a body builder's physique and it sent chills down my spine. This movie has it's flaws, but it is nowhere near the kind of "suck" that people are describing it as. Give if a chance, I hope you like it as much as I did.

Agent Vis's Verdict:

5 stars-Masterful *4.5-Outstanding* 4-Impressive 3.5-Passable 3-Disappointing 2.5-Mediocre 2-Below Average 1.5-Bad 1-Awful .5-Garbage 0-Unwatchable

11 Comments


June 1st, 2009 5:37pm
Maybe the change in continuity has something to do with Marcus Wright's arrival...that's what all the plot outlines suggest
  (Delete)
May 29th, 2009 4:47pm
3.5 from me since Marcus Wright was the only character to have any character development in the story, and cuz they killed him off. That sucked.

And it breaks the "T1" (1984) version of how Kyle Reese met John Connor...dramatically. Kyle seemed to be psychologically affected by his experiences in the slave camps he talked about in "T1" but it was completely contradicted in this movie, where he's only stuck in a clean box for a couple days at most, and is then rescued by John. Very meager and is worse than the original outline for that story, despite the fact that it was a good action flick for me, just not for this series...hence why McG made it clear that he's set out to make something new, and not too nostalgic for die hard fans of the originals.

Great review from a fan of the film though VIS. I haven't been keeping up with yours for a while now. I'll start getting back on that. lolz
  (Delete)
May 27th, 2009 3:34pm
Nice review.
  (Delete)
May 27th, 2009 12:06pm
Great review! I definitely want to see this again.

As far as the Kyle Reese thing goes, MovieBuff, I don't have an answer for you. It does make perfect sense that Skynet would have NO WAY WHATSOEVER of knowing who the hell Reese was or his past affiliation with Sarah Connor. Yes, this was a definite glitch. However I was enjoying a lot of what I saw on screen and tried to side step that as best I could.

BUT, you have a very valid point! What's the answer? Bad writing.
  (Delete)
May 27th, 2009 5:31am
Very good review Vis. I thought the movie was awesome.
  (Delete)
May 27th, 2009 4:22am
Great review VIS. I liked Star Trek just a 'half a star' more than Terminator, but it was very close, they are both excellent films.
  (Delete)
May 27th, 2009 4:16am
Hey man, I'd rather ride go-karts than a roller coaster any day :)

As for your Kyle Reese question...can't tell ya. I just liked the movie...a lot lol
  (Delete)
May 26th, 2009 9:54pm
Go-karts.... haha. If go-karts are 4.5 stars, what's Space Mountain? Twenty stars?

I agree... its a solid movie and Worthington is on his way to stardom, but.... can't agree its a 4.5 star movie.

I also liked that the plot was different. But there is a huge huge plot hole. Why would Skynet have Kyle Reese as number one on the hit list when it couldn't possibly know he's John Conner's father. Stay with me...

Back in 1984, Reese and the original Terminator are... terminated, but not before Reese gets Sarah pregnant. Now... KNOWING what is coming, I'm pretty postive Sarah NEVER placed Reese as John's father on any birth certificate. Which means NO ONE but Sarah knew who John's father was. By 1995 (T2), Sarah has told John who his father is, but again... knowing what's coming I'm positive they kept his father's identity to themselves. So again... how would Skynet know that Kyle is John's father? And if it doesn't, why would Reese be number one on the hit list instead of John?

Someone answer me that, please.
  (Delete)
May 26th, 2009 7:01pm
Great movie. Wasn't too stoked off Bales performance. Every one else was good though. Worthington was amazing. Great review VIS.
  (Delete)
May 26th, 2009 5:36pm
Great review and awesome movie!
  (Delete)
May 26th, 2009 4:36pm
Dude! Finally. Great review. I gave this movie, in my book a 4.3. But still a fan-fucking-tastic movie, and different in a good way. Awesome review man.
  (Delete)

4.5
  Stars
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: May 26th, 2009
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

0 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
3 Stars
Viewing
24 of 60