Turn Advertising Off
 
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

TERMINATOR SALVATION (2009)

"They’re standing down. They won’t mount an attack unless Connor gives the order!"

After the T-X, the highest, most advanced series in the Terminator line, was sent back in time from 2032 to 2004 as a last attempt by Skynet to ensure a machine victory, by supervising the rise of the machines, John Connor's fate was sealed. Some would say that his destiny was always written in stone, even Connor himself somehow believed that blowing up the Cyberdyne Systems building was a devastating blow towards the enemy, yet still believed the threat had not completely been averted. This rang true when Judgment Day hit him out of nowhere. Good thing he was living off the grid, as it was his future lieutenants who were slaughtered in cold blood instead. He ends up at Crystal Peak, a fallout bunker hidden deep within the Nevada mountains similar to NORAD, as the nukes strike around the world and he begins organizing The Resistance. Enter "Terminator Salvation."

STORY

The entire appeal of this movie, to me, was the story. It always has been with this series. "What happens next?" After "T3" I had my doubts about the continuing story arc and if it was to be left to our imaginations. I mean, what had been the point of a third movie circulating the idea that Judgment Day was inevitable if we don't even get to see the War against the Machines? It would have been irrelevant if they had not made "T4" and would of have to have left the series' end at "T2." I was thinking that they dug an unneeded hole with the third film, but wisely, they continued the series. Actually, my biggest complaint with the "Rise of the Machines" was the casting. John Connor = Nick Stahl???? Come on!! The hair isn't even the same color! I actually enjoyed the story and where the series went. But I'm not writing this to speak of that heavily-criticized film, I'm reviewing the sequel: "Terminator Salvation."

Right off the bat we start the new (supposed) trilogy with a bang. Text scrolls the screen as we are given information about the start of the war of Skynet vs. Resistance that fans of the series should rightly know. Skynet tricked humans to be brought online in 2004. Skynet became self-aware within minutes. Skynet asserted that humans were considered a threat to its existence and took control of ALL military weapons systems, launching a global nuclear assault. Survivors called it Judgment Day. One dude knows everything about Skynet. Most people consider him a false prophet. His name: John Connor. The year: 2018. But this is not what I mean. After the scrolled text, we are thrown directly into the post-apocalyptic Californian desert, as Tech-Com Unit Resistance soldiers launch a routine assault against an underground base, guarded by a T-1 and a few T-600s, and led by Connor. What they find is detrimental to the film, and to Connor's expectations of the future war and of his enemy: Skynet is advancing faster than before.

I expected the story to begin a new series of events just as the original three films had done, and that's exactly what it does. Critics who look for the story to be a complete whole in this film are the ones who are dogging it. You must understand that this is the beginning of a second trilogy and that the plot in this film is only 1/3 of the overall story. The fifth film has been given the green light and is in development. What I liked about this film is the realistic idea that the characters must move through the ranks. General Ashdown is the leader of the paramilitary force of rebels calling themselves The Resistance. John Connor is among the group of individuals in power under Ashdown called Command, who each lead a Resistance cell (Connor's being the Tech-Com unit). Kyle Reese is a lone survivor protecting himself and his mute young friend Star from machine forces and living homeless in LA. The film is a bit of an origin tale for Reese as it is a journey of discovery for Connor. John must earn his respect with other cells of The Resistance while evading eradication (yet again, I mean, this is all Skynet does - tries to kill John Connor) and trying to fulfill his prophesized destiny. I liked the movie for that aspect, that the story was synchronous with the established plot, while it took it to new directions. The finale of the movie ended on an unfinished note, yet as I said, the next two installments will give us the grand perspective of the overall plot, so don't expect to get it all from this film. Realistically, we are seeing The First Victory of The Resistance.

ACTING

One of the very first things that I heard about this sequel was that McG was the director and that he had cast Christian Bale in the lead role as John Connor. My hopes were suddenly up, as it was Bale who had brought "Batman Begins" to a level of reality and made up for the campiness of its predecessors with his superb acting. My immediate reaction was as follows: "Damn, Christian Bale's getting ALL the good roles!" As I mentioned above, no one could have done as bad a job in the role as the lackluster Nick Stahl. I could see a resemblance in the casting change from Edward Furlong to Bale. He at least resembled an adult Furlong in my opinion. And I knew that he would be able to pull off the "great military leader" aspect without fail. To my excited anticipation, he did just that. There were parts where he might have seemed over-the-top with the portrayal, as critics were bombing him for. As in - a few scenes. Parts where he is yelling over the radio, but given the circumstances he was in and the situation in which had just occurred during those scenes, any one person would be doing the same. It all boils down to the reality factor, and the critics who bombed him might have been reaching for flaws of this film being biased against it going in.

The other star of this film is Sam Worthington. The guy was a no-name in my book, but after seeing his portrayal of a man on a journey, I salute his acting abilities. The Marcus Wright character's story arc had pain, heart, and soul. It gave the film that something extra which I believe it needed. The "big reveal" that I had been hearing about circulating the end of his journey was not that big of one, actually. The film's plot sort of built up to it, and if you caught everything you might have seen it coming. I would definitely say, though, that Worthington and Bale both played two sides to the film and should both be credited with their screen time as 50/50. Watching from two different perspectives, respectively, gave us as viewers more insight into the depth of the story of this chapter of the Terminator timeline.

The other stars include, but are not limited to, the following.

Bryce Dallas Howard as Kate Connor, who succeeds the role of Kate Brewster portrayed by Claire Danes in "Rise of the Machines." I must tell you that Mrs. Connor is pregnant in this film; you should absolutely know that going in, as the film makes no reference to it other than glimpsing her small bowling ball of a stomach. The T-850 that killed John in 2032 and was reprogrammed and sent back to 2004 by Kate tells them both that their children become important in the future, and that Kate will eventually become Leader of The Resistance. That is the knowledge you should remember going in as far as her character is concerned. I enjoyed her portrayal as a more realistic take than the forced line-reading acting given by Danes in the last installment. In this chapter, she has abandoned her career of veterinary work and has pursued medicine in the unexplained fifteen years since Judgment Day. Dr. Kate Connor, MD. Who knew?

Anton Yelchin as Kyle Reese, who portrays the character as a teenager ten years prior to when we meet him in "T1." I seriously don't know what to write here. This new actor has taken what Michael Biehn had done with the character in 1984 and breathed new life into him. The mannerisms are all there that Reese is known for, and some are even learned through the course of the film. He isn't the no-holds-barred soldier from the first film yet, but you can definitely visualize that he is on his way to getting there. And when he and John Connor meet for the first time in the eyes of peril, it is a welcomed moment of nostalgia.

Moon Bloodgood has a very minor role compared to the above characters, but her Blair Williams was a strong character and one I hope to see in the next chapter. Her strength, determination, and belief in the Marcus character are what ride the story through in the middle of the film. Other very small and/or minor roles were Common as John Connor's right-hand soldier Barnes, Jadagrace as Kyle Reese's mute friend Star, and Helena Bonham Carter as Cyberdyne Systems research scientist Serena Kogan who is in ONE SCENE and portrayed in another (compared to cast lists which depict her as a main character). I felt that they all played their parts of the film dignified and gave it what was needed.

DIRECTING

Well, well, well. What to say about a man named McG? The director of previous cheesiness such as "Charlie's Angels" 1 & 2 and TV's "The OC," and writing hit songs for the 90s pop band Sugar Ray, I had difficulty accepting that this was the guy meant to bring us the Future War in all its glory. My belief had begun to be shaken when I saw the first glimpses of artwork for the post-apocalyptic environment of Los Angeles that had spread over the Internet, where I am a frequent visitor. He surprisingly did an outstanding job with the biggest hat of his career, and I foresee that this film will be his best to date, no doubt. The one thing I can criticize him for, however, is his decision to cut some great scenes from the theatrical release that were present in the extended trailer. Maybe he was under pressure from the studio and had to keep the length of the film under a certain amount of time, or maybe he simply pulled a Brett Ratner and left scenes on the cutting room floor for no apparent reason. I just hope it's the former and not the latter, and that they will be included in a special "Resistance Edition."

VISUALS

Spectacular. Not as great as the work on "Star Trek," the competing blockbuster, but good nonetheless. I was skeptical of the special effects at first due to some scenes in the trailers. Specifically, the part where the mototerminator (unmanned bike with machine guns) leaps over the truck in slow-motion and lands perfectly on the road in front of it at regular speed. That part just looked very cheesy to me. Also, the other part I was skeptical of was the T-800 endoskeleton skull which drops to the floor and the body falls behind it right before you see the red eyes fade out. The drop and bounce of the head just struck me strange, too. Like, "That's the most realistic they could make it look?" However when I saw these scenes in theaters on the silver screen I was struck differently. I may still think like that when the film comes to DVD and I'm watching it on an analog TV, but as far as seeing it in theaters, the visuals went beyond my expectations. The silver light effect that they used on prints of the film was awesome and made LA seem like such a gloomy world, and the war scenes were the best parts of the film, non-story-wise.

OVERALL

In conclusion, the film succeeded or rather EX-ceeded my expectations in the aspects of story continuity, acting, visuals and even directing. One other thing I must mention is the music or sound category. The reigns were handed over to Danny Elfman, a respected film scorer who takes over for Brad Fiedel, who created the unique sounds in the Terminator movies. And I must say, he does an excellent job. There are theme songs you will recognize, such as the machine theme and the iconic Terminator theme over the title sequences at the beginning and ending of the film. Another thing I forgot to mention was Linda Hamilton's return to the series in the form of voice-overs from tapes recorded for John beginning at the end of "T1." Just her signing on to the production gave it the "official" seal for me. She said no to "Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines" because it strayed from James Cameron's version and her Sarah Connor character's story arc was minor, if at all relevant. She would be killed off in that film had she returned. The fact that she had said no and had not returned meant that her death occurred off-screen between "T2" and "T3" and was slightly alluded to in the latter. Her return to the series for "Salvation" means that she had approved of the franchise's new direction and had agreed to be a part of it. After these events, I knew that I could not miss this chapter of the Terminator timeline's continuing story. The rise of the T-800, which has been revealed everywhere, I thought was interesting and added new content to the series, as Skynet is pumping out Terminators ahead of schedule and John must decide how to deal with the new threat being developed in 2018 instead of its original inception in 2029. The Schwarzenegger cameo was brief but well-done. The CGI work was seamless with Roland Kickinger's movements. I thought the film ended perfectly and kept the timeline in place with what is supposed to happen, which is incredibly important to me. Although I am wishing and hoping for an Extended Version on DVD, with better special features than "T3," and please, give it a better casing job than that one!

18 Comments


June 10th, 2009 1:04pm
Alright now I've read 'em all and commented on em all too.
  (Delete)
June 9th, 2009 10:29pm
Yes slysnide I just read your Terminator reviews today, and commented on each one. Great reviews, BTW. I haven't read the new one yet, however. I'm about to read it, actually. I'm interested in what you think as a whole of that film now that I know your take on the rest of the series.
  (Delete)
June 8th, 2009 9:28am
i get ya now CBF. and i got that data on RP's role in T5 from statements McG made about the upcoming sequel. Whether he sticks with the idea, or just has him do the stem cell stuff as you said remains to be seen. Though given that RP hasn't done much lately, then there's really no reason for him to not return. Plus McG said he'd be the same age that he is today.

And did you check out any of my Terminator reviews? Agree with any of them?
  (Delete)
June 8th, 2009 7:41am
pretty good review man I thought it was 4 stars too good job
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 11:21pm
"I hope the Time Displacement Equipment gets developed in the next installment...send all the robots back at the same time and then blow it up in 'T6.'"

I'm referring to the Time Displacement Equipment (TDE) that is used to send entities through time. In "T1" it is stated by Reese that his Resistance team, led by Connor, stormed the facility which housed the TDE and overtook the Time Displacement Chamber, in which John Connor was able to use after SkyNet sent a lone T-800 through in order to send Reese through to the exact same time and location to protect Sarah Connor. After he did this, Connor blew the whole place to smithereens. Reese says this to Dr. Silberman and the cop in the interrogation scene. What I was trying to say was that I hope they don't send the first T-800, Reese, the second T-800, T-1000, the T-850, and the T-X all back at the same time and then destroy it in "T6." That would be cheezy. Not to mention nonsensical.

And John Connor gets assassinated by a T-850, if you remember. Which is an upgrade of a T-800. It was an old, obsolete design when they sent it to kill Connor, as the T-X model was out, but due to J.C.'s past that's why they sent it. Kate, elevating to the status of Leader of The Resistance, reprogrammed it and sent it back through the TDE field in order to ensure that past John and Kate survive Judgment Day. What I'm hoping is that they span all the Terminators and Reese sent back through time through these next two installments, and not just a one-shot deal (which was an early T4 SCRIPT that was released online).

On another note, they may have confirmed Patrick as the scientist who develops the mimetic poly-alloy? Wow, that would be interesting and make perfect sense! The only things that I've been reading state that he may be developing stem-cell research and how people can be made to look younger. Where did you find that info?
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 8:34pm
"and then blow it up in T6." what R U referring to? blowing up all of SkyNet? cuz J.C. is assasinated by a T-800 in "T6" if they keep with the timeline, and if they keep J.C. in all 3 McG flicks.

They may have confirmed RP's role as the scientist whom develops the liquid metal in T5.
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 6:38pm
True, and I hope the Time Displacement Equipment gets developed in the next installment, I mean that would be cheezy if they send all the robots back at the same time and then blow it up in "T6." But Kyle Reese states in "T1" that the T-800s are "new." Bad breath, sweat, blood...he had to wait until it attacked Sarah before it could zero in on it. Which is why he followed her to the Tech Noir club. He says that the T-600s were easy to spot with their rubber skin, and even Connor mentions this in "T4," that the 600s are a "primitive design," big, fast, and slow. So the T-800s definitely become developed on switched online in 2029. I know what you're saying, though, the TDE needs to be activated in the next movie, and I think that's what McG is aiming for, from what I have been reading online. Also that he wants Robert Patrick to appear as inspiration for the T-1000 prototype, so that would mean that Reese gets sent back in the next one.
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 6:28pm
Actually come to think of it, no matter how many T-800s they have, it won't matter w/out time travelling capabilities. That will be introduced in the second film as a concept, but whether it'll be perfected in the next one or the one thereafter remains to be seen. If they keep with the timeline, (and depending on the movie's timeline) then that may be perfected in 2029, or #3. maybe #2, we'll see.
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 6:19pm
Yes I remember now. He states that he serves under Perry as a Tech-Com Unit soldier from "21 to 27." That's 2021 to 2027. Only in the last few years did he know John Connor and serve under him then get sent back by him in the year 2029...the year the T-800s are SUPPOSED to go online and Skynet sends one back to kill Sarah because the Resistance again triumphs, even though there are supposed to be hundreds of T-800s storming the battlefield with plasma rifles.

My whole thing with the T-800s was that they're being manufactured from this location in San Francisco, ten years ahead of schedule. Well, since John Connor blows the place with a stockpile of T-800 fuel cells (mini-nukes), that SHOULD set them back another ten years which knocks that part of the timeline in accordance with the original series. UNLESS... the T-800s are being manufactured in various "Skynet Central" locations, and in that case, they really haven't stopped them from coming online. John Connor mentions in the closing scene that "we've won our first victory, but Skynet is a GLOBAL NETWORK, and we won't rest until it all gets destroyed." Something like that, which left this question of mine lingering and unanswered.
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 6:03pm
In T1 Kyle stated that he didn't come to know J.C. until after a long time serving in a SkyNet slave camp, and he only heard of J.C. since it was he who showed the prisoners in an unmentioned way how to defeat the machines and escape the camps. Michael Biehn's portrayal of Reese in the scene where he explains this was very distraught, and unwilling to divulge more as if the ordeal had scarred him too much to the point where it was hard to talk about, and THAT made perfect sense for his behavior in T1. However, in T4 he's only stuck in a sterile box for a few days until J.C. rescues him, and reveals his identity after tossing him in the elevator...hardly as traumatizing as years in SkyNet slave camps, and given Kyle's age in T4, and his attitude after those events, then he hardly seemed traumatized by what occurred, for at the end of the film Reese is in a better place than the beginning, for he's no longer hiding at a radio tower in L.A. literally fighting to survive day to day life, but is living a safer life with the leaders of the Resistance. That's the main contradiction that I noted.

As for where the T-800s come from, I agree, in the original series, wasn't it stated that the T-800s came from the same place? I can't recall despite watching them a month ago. But if that's the case, then that's another clearly incorrect event in the Terminator timeline.
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 1:54pm
Thanks JB and sly!

JB ~
Don't get too fired up over Bale as Connor, as simply put, he didn't impress a whole lot of people. He impressed me as far as being better than Nick "no-leader-never-was" Stahl and displaying the bravery and badass-ness in order to be a great, military leader.

sly ~
I am wondering what are the parts that contradict the original series, I actually went out of my way to find those and I don't see where they are. I hear what you're saying about the fact that they didn't explain about the "Skynet Central" location North of San Francisco being 1 Skynet powerhouse of an overall global network. What I want to know is, what's up with all the other locations then, and are they pumping out T-800s too? That would contradict the original series were that the case, but what we get from the film is that the SF location is the starting point for the T-800 factory. I'm definitely going to read your reviews, though, sly.
  (Delete)
June 7th, 2009 9:45am
I get your opinion here. I rated it at 3.5 for contradicting some points made in the original series, and for S.W. being the most interesting character in it, though killed off at the end of this first part of the new trilogy. C.B. as J.C. failed to impress me at all, though he was better than N.S. in "T3" which I liked better. The climax was played up as if all of SkyNet was centralized at 1 location in S.F., CA despite that after the climax, J.C. states that only a small victory was achieved, or something along those lines. J.C. had no character development either, which was odd, and he didn't do too many "amazing" like things in "T4" that make him seem like the prophetic leader of the Resistance.

Good review though. My 4 reviews for the Terminator Franchise are my 107th-110th reviews that are on my second page of reviews overall (i've currently got 118). And i wrote a Star Trek review if you wanna read that, having finally caved and went to see it after expressing my disinterest in the film.
  (Delete)
June 6th, 2009 5:33pm
wow extremly well written bub. it seems we share a common intrest in the "sacred" timeline of the terminator francise. I agree Nick Stahl didint fit well as John Conner but the way you describe Bales performance gets me fired up to see his portrayal. ive also heard good things about Sam worthington who like you mentioned was a no name to me also. Had my douhts about "mcg" 2 i hated the charlie angel movies an was shocked to hear he took the riegns of the francise but if what you said is true i have nothing to worry about.Also looking 4ward to seeing a young Kyle Reese as he almost made my top ten "badass" list hopefully they hint more to him in the next movie. goes with out mentionin but good review well worth the wait and one of your best! ;)
  (Delete)
June 6th, 2009 4:13pm
I found these comments on FilmSchoolRejects.com and I just wanted to share a few things that I agree with about "Terminator 5":

Stick to the Canon. There are somethings that shouldn't change. Judgment Day happens. John Connor leads the resistance to victory. Anything else is bullshit. Don't make it that John Connor leads the resistance to victory by fathering the child who actually leads the resistance to victory. Don't make it so that his sacrifice is what does it. We've seen images of the future in the past, better films and John Connor defeating the machines by being a bad ass. That's why you hired Christian Bale and machines are so scared of him.

Brad Fiedel's Score. The music that accompanies the Terminator is classic and instantly recognizable. Would you make Jaws without the Jaws Theme? Fiedel's score should be the starting point, not a reference. Danny Elfman's score of this latest installment was weaksauce.

Deliver More Kyle Reese. Anton Yelchin did a great job despite not having a big enough role. Kyle Reese and John Connor are supposed to be pretty tight. Give Reese a bigger, more action-oriented part and keep Yelchin in the role.

Terminators. Lots and lots of Terminators. Salvation only delivered us a few T-600s. Most of the robots we saw were Hunter Killers. Meh. More cybernetic assassins. Show us what a war really looks like.

A Future War. Who among us does not want to see what Earth looks like in the year 2029? We've seen glimpses - hundreds of T-800s marching across Los Angeles. Hunter Killers floating above massive T-1 like tanks. Human skulls crushed underfoot as the resistance fighters themselves flee in armored pick-ups, firing laser cannons, and generally looking like awesome. Salvation was about 10 years too early to be that film. Rumors for the next sequel take even more steps backwards. This can not happen.

Make Christian Bale the Star. The Connors have always been the main focus of the franchise. Sarah Connor passed the torch to John and we've wanted a movie about awesome ass-kicking action since we first got a glimpse of it. Now they've cast Christian Bale as John Connor. Any further Terminator sequel that does not feature Christian Bale as John Connor as the leading role is a serious misstep. In Salvation Marcus Wright was too much the focus. McG said Sarah Connor might be the star of the next sequel. WRONG. Christian Bale as John Connor is it or you can go fuck yourself.

Who else agrees with all this? I sure as hell do. Terminator 5 BETTER BE THIS or bust!! Time Travel should be introduced as well to keep the timeline intact. The year should be 2029 and the T-800s should go online, Skynet sends one back, and Connor sends Reese back and blows the joint.
  (Delete)
June 6th, 2009 1:34am
Thanks guys, I appreciate it. I hope more people get a chance to read it, it took me a while to write.
  (Delete)
June 3rd, 2009 7:38pm
Awesome movie and great review.
  (Delete)
June 3rd, 2009 5:03am
I agree, awesome review and great movie.
  (Delete)
June 3rd, 2009 2:56am
Awesome review.
  (Delete)

4
  Stars
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: June 3rd, 2009
CBF's Profile
CBF
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

0 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
3 Stars
Viewing
15 of 60