Turn Advertising Off
 
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

PUBLIC ENEMIES (2009)

"Stranger stop and wish me well, just say a prayer for my soul in hell. I was a good fellow, most people said, betrayed by a woman dressed all in red."

Just got back from seeing this. As I got out of the theaters I was kind of in shellshock, to be honest....

After that passed, I realized that like a one legged pirate, "Public Enemies", helmed by Hollywood's very own HD CAM junkie Michael Mann limps along to the two hour and twenty minute mark and has, as Ricky Ricardo would say, "A lot of S'plainin' to do". In a world of well staged shootouts, fun and cocky dialogue and heartthrob's Johnny Depp and Christian Bale, the words "story development" may or may not really make much of a difference, but let's not kid ourselves here, they really do.

It is the 1930's and the F.B.I. (sorry B.I.) has just declared their first war on crime, targeting some of the country's most notorious dangers to the well being of society. John Dillinger is one such criminal, claiming bragging rights to the fact that he can clear out a safe in "one minute and forty seconds...flat." With the help of Baby Face Nelson and Pretty Boy Floyd (Nevermind on that one) there really isn't any bank they can't knock over or any jail cell secure enough to hold them in, that is until they are matched by the likes of FBI agent Melvin Purvis. Purvis pulls all the stops to remain hot on Dillinger's tail in attempts to capture him "Dead or Dead". Along the way, Dillinger falls for Billie Frechette, a coat check girl who you'd more than likely expect to catch wearing a three dollar dress in a room full of Mink. Their love is tested when Dillinger is pursued and eventually restrained and locked away, only to escape once more through clever tom foolery in an attempt to fall back into Billie's arms once more while staying alive long enough to do it.

To its credit, "Public Enemies" lives up to its expectations as a first rate gangster flick, steadily filling the screen with a barrage of machine gun bullets, almost to the point that you can smell the gunpowder from the fifth row. There's enough blood, gore and suspense to keep any action fan at bay, and if you don't squirm in your seat during end of the second to last scene you may need to check your pulse at the door. Unless you've experienced a shootout in person, there is a particularly notable (but still bullshit, as I 'll explain later) one between the B.I. and Dillinger at the Little Bohemia Lodge at the picture's halfway point that should leave you breathless. In fact, if I were to rate "Public Enemies" on a scale for action alone, I'd happily award it with a five star honor, but this isn't meant to be just some run of the mill Schwarzenegger popcorn flick, this is meant to be a fine slice of cinema, and cinema has certain prerequisites.

As I stared up at a crisp digital print of the film, I couldn't help but wonder why a big budget movie of this caliber was decidedly shot, in Michael Mann fashion, in HD. At times, the image looked beautifully gritty and realistic, while at others as degrading and false as home video This makes me seriously contemplate why Mann still insists on shooting on cheap digital cameras like the F-23 which he used for this particular project instead of actual film or even a Red One. My question may never be answered, but ultimately it's the film's quality that suffers, which in turn managed to remove me on more than one occasion from the fantasy world of the picture. I wish I could say this was the only aspect that distracted me from my viewing experience.

It seems as if in a stirring turn of events, which occurs somewhere between the opUniversal logo and the end credits, Michael Mann has failed to include even a stitch of character or story development. With the exception of her basic introduction at a dingy city bar, Billie has absolutely no back story what-so-ever. This never allows us the opportunity to connect with her on even the most elementary of levels neither emotionally nor physically. The same goes for Agent Purvis, whose character is flatter than a dollar flapjack off the sunrise special, making this one of Bale's most forgettable performances to date. There is absolutely no chemistry between Depp and Cotillard, which is a shame when you consider how dynamic both of these top notch actors are individually. To his credit, Depp does manage to deliver another stunning, hardnosed performance as John Dillinger and proves to once again be a complete joy to marvel at on screen. If only the story had as much pizazz.

As a whole, we are presented with bits and pieces of celluloid that never quite seem to join together to make an actual movie, but rather come off as a series of disjointed, yet entertaining vignettes. You would think that by the tenth film in Mann's powerful resume, he would have learned by now how to pace and execute a motion picture instead disproving his validity as a serious director by making these easy to avoid errors that stand out on screen like a bad spelling mistake. When you mix everything up in an over-sized pot and stir, the ultimate result is an undercooked, emotionless and disconnected final product.

If you're expecting to walk into "Public Enemies" thinking it's going to be the next "Godfather" or "Goodfellas", you may find yourself severely disillusioned at the film's conclusion. Then again, if you walk into the movie expecting to be thrilled by impeccably staged action sequences and a few downright impressive shootouts you may find yourself satisfied with your ten dollar ticket purchase. Either way, discerning audiences will demand explanation for why studio execs failed to well...explain anything. Someone tell Mr. Ricardo that it's time for his close up.

Also, Pretty Boy Floyd was not killed by Melvin Purvis and was still alive when Dillinger died (as was Van Meter and Nelson). Not only that but Purvis was a complete imbecile. Hoover disliked him but had no other choice until bringing in Samuel Cowley, who was technically in charge when Dillinger was gunned down. The Little Bohemia scene, again though interesting, was way off base. That event was one of the biggest disasters for the B.I. Everyone of importance got away. Plus it was a rookie Fed who killed the citizen as they tried to leave, not Purvis (there was very little shooting that night, unlike the movie). Then at the end Hamilton was Dillinger's new girlfriend though not portrayed that way in this movie. That's why he went to the theatre that night. The movie made it seem like some random event. And, last but not least, no one heard what Dillinger muttered when he was lying in the street dying. Worth the price of admission but very muddled and don't try and write a biography paper for school from it.

8 Comments


July 3rd, 2009 7:36am
Good review. I'll have to wait and read Wise guys review.
  (Delete)
July 2nd, 2009 4:29pm
Good review. However, I liked it alot. I just posted my 4.5 review if you wanna read that. I found the visuals to be the most impressive, having returned to the real Little Bohemia Lodge to film the shootout. Though the changing of events and dates to accomodate this slightly fictionalized story bugged me such that my rating dropped.
  (Delete)
July 2nd, 2009 2:15am
I would have thought this one would have been better than 3 stars.Oh well,I guess I will wait for this one on DVD.Nice review though.
  (Delete)
July 1st, 2009 10:17pm
Good.
  (Delete)
July 1st, 2009 10:09pm
You said that this was awesome. Forget about it.
You have your opinions and I have mine. You liked it and I loved it. Now lets stop arguing about movie's all the time.
  (Delete)
July 1st, 2009 10:01pm
Oh, and did I divulge into it's "awesomeness"? No. All I said was "Yeah" and what the fuck ever. You have your opinions, I have mine.

I'd also like to note that you're my best fwiend ever! lol
  (Delete)
July 1st, 2009 9:58pm
I'm going to quote myself:

"Just got back from seeing this. As I got out of the theaters I was kind of in shellshock, to be honest....

After that passed..."
  (Delete)
July 1st, 2009 9:39pm
You disappoint me. You came out of the movie and I asked you, "What did you think?". You said "It was awesome."
This was one of the best films of the year (probably the best).
It was entertaining, exhilariting, very well-acted, thrilling, and last but not least a superb story.
While it is not Mann's best film, it certainly is a brilliant addition to his works of art. I loved it.
  (Delete)

3
  Stars
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: July 1st, 2009
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

0 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
4 Stars
Viewing
26 of 35