Turn Advertising Off
 
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

"How grand it must be to be the Chosen One."

Harry Potter; this is a name that is known far and wide these days. You may like him, you may love him, you may NOT like him, and you may hate him, but either way, you've heard the name. I've been a Harry Potter fan since I was in fourth grade. I've read all the books multiple times, and I've seen every movie (with the unfortunate exception of "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets") in theaters, and have loved them all. I try my hardest, and succeed (for the most part), at not comparing the books. I'll admit, there are some instances where I go, "Oh, I wish that they would have put this in here," but for the most part, I just enjoy the movies for what they are, representations of the books that I so love. I remember back in 2001, when "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" was coming out, and I had just started to read the books. Mom wouldn't allow me to see it until I'd read all four of them (at that time, "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" was the latest addition to the series). I did so, and went and saw the movie, and was amazed. This was way back before my movie addiction kicked in, as well, and so it was mostly euphoria. Watching the movies now, it's still the same. I've loved Harry Potter and the entire universe all my life, and this is one of the ones that I've been waiting for. Ever since I read the book, I knew that "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" would be one of the best movies in the whole series. Not that the others don't, but this was one of the ones that had the most intense parts of the series in it, and they handled it masterfully. This movie also marks a landmark for me. It was the first movie that I've ever seen at midnight on the opening day. Having now had the experience, I'm glad that I chose "Harry Potter" to debut into the midnight scene. It was one of the most fun experiences I've ever had. The fact that I woke up early and watched all five of the first movies to prepare myself for this one, too, only made it that much more awesome to watch. The movie itself, anyway, is done very well. It's follows the book very closely, from what I remember of the book, anyway, and does a nice job with everything. They put in a few parts that I had wondered if they would or wouldn't, and it all turned out great. I must admit to being completely and utterly pissed off last year when the date for "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" was changed from November 21, 2008 to July 15, 2009. I nearly threw my computer out of the window in anger, but I stuck out the months, and today I was finally rewarded. They confirmed that since the date was moved back, they were going to add parts to the movie. This definitely made me feel a lot better about the push back, since it meant getting an even closer book adaptation. Not something I push for, but definitely something that I like to see. "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is definitely one of the best entries in this movie series, and everything about it pulls it together wonderfully.

David Yates returns to the director's seat for the "Harry Potter" movie franchise, making him the only one, since Christopher Columbus, who directed "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" and "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets," to return and do more than one "Harry Potter" film. Yates did a great job with "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," and believe it or not, he does an even better job with this, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince." He really masters the camera for the film, and pulls the movie together nicely. He comes up with some of the most fantastic angles for a movie that I've seen. He makes different scenes that involve magic, mischief, and other such fantastic sequences pop with these angles. For instance, in the scene where Harry, Ron, and Hermoione visit Weasley's Wizarding Wheezes with the rest of the Weasley family. There is so much going on in the shop, that the angles used by Yates really make it even more exciting to watch. It's a definite upside when lot of what you saw, you pictured in the books. Granted, it was a bit mroe fantastic than that of the book, but it still, for the most part, is the general idea for what you pictured reading the book. He also manages some excellent filters. The best one that I saw in this movie, happens on the Hogwarts Express in the beginning of the movie, when Harry sets off the darkness powder. The seen is so dark and foggy, which is exactly what you'd expect, since you know what it's supposed to do. It definitely worked out to the scenes benefit, making it more intense, in a way. Yates really knows what he's doing behind the character, and I really like where he's taken the movies so far. I'm very interested in seeing what he does with "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II." Steve Kloves returns once more to write the screenplay for the movie. If you'll remember, Kloves wrote thes creenplay for all of the "Harry Potter" films, except for "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," which is this film's predecessor, which was written by Michael Goldenberg. I'm not saying that Goldenberg did a bad job, because he didn't in the slightest, but it's definitely nice to see Kloves return to the series. He does a great job at developing the screenplay from the book written by J.K. Rowling, and making it a very gripping movie. I noticed that this film pretty much followed the book, which is a definite upside, and the whole movie turns out nicely. Kloves definitely knows how to make Rowling's books into movies, and it's definitely nice to see him return to the series.

The visuals of this movie are definitely done with valor. One thing that you can always count on the "Harry Potter" series for, is some excellent and magical visuals. This movie does not disappoint. In fact, this movie's visuals are some of the best that the series has seen so far. I'll start first by mentioning the magic sequences of this movie. The first noticeable one occurs while Dumbledore and Harry travel to see Slughorn. You'll see a complete house resurrecting itself. I know it sounds strange, but it definitely looks great, and everything fixing itself was definitely awesome to watch. Another scene of magic occurs, like I mentioned earlier, during the scene where everyone visits Fred and George's shop, Weasley's Wizarding Wheezes. It's definitely awesome to see all of their trinkets and other such bits and bobs flying around, and doing what they're supposed to do. They make for a very excellent scene, and anyone watching can't help but have a smile on their face at the antics of the twins. There are other things throughout the movie that make for definite visual excellences. The scenes that involve Dumbledore and Harry using the pensieve. It's definitely a different thing than what the norm would be for the movie. What I really liked was all of the memory pulling together for Harry to watch. It's hard to explain, but it looks like ink falling through water, and then pulling itself together to form people and buildings and ordinary objects. It's definitely very cool to watch. Another thing that's very cool to see, and many will remember this particular visual from the last movie, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," and that is the Death Eaters as they travel around. They turn into a grouping of shadows, and travel about. It's definitely very awesome to watch. Especially as Bellatrix and everyone else travels around and making a mess of everything they touch, which is exactly what the Death Eaters are supposed to be. One other thing I want to mention, is really the looks of one of the characters. In the book, Fenrir Greyback is a feared and scary character, and in the movie, his looks reflect what he was in the book. He doesn't even take his wolfen form, and it looks like he's been wolfing out. He looks pretty much EXACTLY what he should look like from the book's description. This I was very happy with. The visuals of this movie definitely manage to make it even more enjoyable, which is something that you could barely believe to be possible. They manage to get pretty much everything done right, which really helps the movie even more as a book adaption. DEFINITELY a great job with the visuals of this movie, which only add to the intensity of the film.

The Storyline of this movie was definitely done very well. I know this is the part where I break down on how the writers did with the storyline of the movie. However, it's needless to say that the writer did great with this movie. J.K. Rowling not only created a series of bestselling, and mega popular books. She, like George Lucas, managed to create an entire world on the pages of her books. She created terms, sports, creatures, names, schools, subjects, and everything. It's hard to think that she managed to start this incredible legacy by writing the basics of "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" on a mere napkin at a cafe in London. Rowling definitely knows how to spin an excellent story. "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is a prime example of this. It has so much going on, now that the story has been developed throughout "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" and "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." Harry Potter has seen the return of the dark lord Voldemort, same with Professor Dumbledore, and now the rest of the world knows it. The problem is, saving the rest of the world. The Death Eaters are holding nothing back as they ruthlessly attack things, and it makes for one epic struggle. "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," I feel, is where everything comes into fruition for the series. It's the penultimate pedastal in this iconic series, and this is where the real shit starts to hit the fan. The definite upside about "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is that it manages to keep things intense throughout the whole thing. The book had this feeling when I was reading it. It was very hard to put down. I felt the same way with the movie. It was very hard to look away from the screen as everything unfolded throughout the film. This is where the storyline triumphs most. It's almost impossible to put the book down, and it's almost impossible to look away from the screen. What I think is also very interesting about this movie, is the fact that it finally indulges us into the reason behind Voldemort's power, and his serious reluctance to fully die. I won't divulge further with this, for those of you who have not read the books, but know that you will finally be getting the answers to the questions that have undoubtedly been plaguing your mind since the beginning of the series. Overall, the storyline manages to capture your attention, and hold it throughout the whole movie, while at the same time giving us some long awaited answers.

The movie begins as Harry Potter (Played by Daniel Radcliffe of "The Tailor of Panama") is sitting down at a table in a coffee shop, reading The Daily Prophet. A waitress walks up and asks him who Harry Potter is, since he is mentioned on the front cover. They talk around a little bit, and it seems as if Harry's got himself a date. However, as Harry looks out the window at a passing train, he notices something strange, as he suddenly finds himself staring at Albus Dumbledore (Played by Michael Gambon of "Sleepy Hollow"), the headmaster of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. He leaves the shop, and heads over to talk to Dumbledore. They exchange a few words, and Dumbledore tells Harry to take his arm. They apparate, and find themselves in a small village. Dumbledore tells Harry that he does well for his first apparation. They walk along the street, and Dumbledore leads Harry to a house where he asks if Harry was wondering why he was there, and Harry just says that he doesn't ask questions against Dumbledore's methods anymore, but when they get to the door of the house where this teacher is obviously staying, Dumbledore and Harry notice that it is completely destroyed, and notice that it has a deserted air to it. They both draw their wands and enter, looking around at the wreckage of the house as they search it. Suddenly, Dumbledore notices blood dripping from the cieling. As he tastes it, he smiles, and walks over to a rather comfortable armchair sitting in a corner. He pokes it, and suddenly, the chair springs into life as Horace Slughorn (Played by Jim Broadbent of "Moulin Rouge!") stands up, having disguised himself as a chair. As they talk, we find out that Slughorn was merely hiding, since the Death Eaters had been at his door countless times to get him to join their ranks, and you can only say "No" so many times. Dumbledore asks to use the restroom, and Slughorn tells him where it is, after they clean house of course, but he's not going to say yes to Dumbledore's question. While Dumbledore is in the bathroom, Harry and Slughorn talk, and Slughorn talks to Harry about Sirius Black (Portrayed in the previous three films by Gary Oldman of "Dead Fish"), Harry's godfather, and how he'd taught the whole Black family, EXCEPT for Sirius. He shows Harry the shelf of all of his students, and there Harry sees a picture of his mother as young girl. Dumbledore returns, just as Slughorn is really starting to get used to Harry, and they head out. Slughorn asks why they're leaving so fast, but all Dumbledore has to say is that he knows a lost cause when he sees one, and they leave. However, as they reach the entrance into the front garden of the home where Slughorn was staying, Slughorn rushes out, and tells Dumbledore that he will return. Dumbledore sends Harry to The Burrow, where Harry finds that he'll be staying until school. As everyone, including Molly Weasley (Played by Julie Walters of "Billy Elliot"), Ginny Weasley (Played by Bonnie Wright of the made-for-TV movie, "Stranded"), Ron Weasley (Played by Rupert Grint of "Thunderpants"), and Hermione Granger (Played by Emma Watson of the made-for-TV movie, "Ballet Shoes"), acknowledges his return to the Burrow, we cut to a new scene. It's rainy, and two women head to a house and knock. The door is answered by Peter Pettigrew (Played by Timothy Spall of "The Last Samurai"), who takes them in to see Severus Snape (Played by Alan Rickman of "Die Hard"). The women, we find, are Narcissa Malfoy (Played by Helen McCrory of "Becoming Jane"), mother of Draco Malfoy (Played by Tom Felton of "Anna and the King"), and her sister Bellatrix Lestrange (Played by Helena Bonham Carter of "Fight Club"). They talk with Snape, and we find that Draco has been selected by Voldemort to perform a task at Hogwarts, and Narcissa wants Snape to watch over him at Hogwarts. Snape agrees, and Bellatrix performs an Unbreakable curse. Soon, everyone is at Diagon Alley, admiring Fred (Played by James Phelps of the "Harry Potter" series) and his twin, George Weasley's (Played by Oliver Phelps of the "Harry Potter" series) new shop. However, as they leave, they notice Malfoy and his Mother acting oddly, and follow them into Nocturne alley, where they see some sort of weird ceremony, but before they see anything concrete, the window is shut by a scary looking man, none other than Fenrir Greyback (Played by Dave Legeno of "Rise of the Footsoldier"). Harry, Ron, and Hermione head off for another year at Hogwarts, but when they arrive, they find that new measures are being taken, as they enjoy classes with all of their teachers, Filius Flitwick (Played by Warwick Davis of "Leprechaun"), Minerva McGonagall (Played by Maggie Smith of "Tea with Mussolini"), and the Caretaker, Argus Filch (Played by David Bradley of "Tom's Midnight Garden"). However, as things progress, they find that Slughorn wasn't recruited for Defense Against the Dark Arts, but rather Potions, and Severus Snape will be taking over the Defense Against the Dark Arts class, rather than resume his post as Potions Master. It's a strange year at Hogwarts School fo Witchcraft and Wizardry as Harry, Ron, and Hermione battle their way through offensive kids like Cormac McLaggen (Played by Freddie Stroma of "Lady Godiva"), and obsessive girls like Lavender Brown (Played by Jessie Cave of the made-for-TV movie, "Summerhill") and Romilda Vane (Played by Anna Shaffer in her acting debut). However, they're joined by old friends, like the Caretaker and Care of Magical Creatures Professor, Rubeus Hagrid (Played by Robbie Coltrane of "From Hell"), Luna Lovegood (Played by Evanna Lynch who made her film debut in "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix") and Neville Longbottom (Played by Matthew Lewis of "Some Kind of Life"). However, as Harry begins lessons with Dumbledore, he is given a new assignment to get friendly with Horace Slughorn, whom witholds a great secret that they must learn, if they are going to defeat the dark lord Voldemort, and end the reign of terror that seems to have only just begun. It's going to be another tough year for Harry Potter, as he figured, but what he didn't figure, was just HOW tough it was going to be. All of these actors have had the chances to grow into their roles, and they do so magnificently. I expect it's nothing for any of them to slip right into character, and they do so wonderfully. Daniel Radcliffe, as Harry, Rupert Grint, as Ron, and Emma Watson, as Hermione, all do wonderful jobs with their parts. Same with Michael Gambon, who as always, does an excellent job as Professor Albus Dumbledore, though we still miss Richard Harris, undoubtedly. Also, Robbie Coltrane, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman, Helena Bonham Carter, and the rest of the supporting cast must also be brought to attention, as they all play their parts admirably. Newcomer Jim Broadbent does a most wonderful job as Horace Slughorn, and plays him nearly JUST like I imagined Slughorn in the book, which is absolutely awesome. Definitely a good job in his performance. All of the actors and actresses get their respective characters' feelings, worries, emotions, and other such characteristics down nicely for the movie, helping to add even more intensity to it. Definitely a great job on the casting of this movie.

All in all, this was another great contribution to the "Harry Potter" series, and one of my new favorites of the series. Everything goes according to plan, as one of the best books in the series becomes one of the best movies in the series. The Director of this movie does a great job with angles and filters, as he proves for a second time, since he directed the previous installment in the series. He really knows his stuff, and adds nicely to the film. DEFINITELY a great job on the Directing of this movie. The Writing of this movie shows us the return of a writer who had been missing from the previous installment of the film. He definitely does a great job with the movie once more, as he did with the first four movies, and makes an excellent contribution to the series. DEFINITELY a great job on the Writing of this movie. The Visuals of this movie, of course, and as always, are bloody brilliant, as the magic, the Death Eaters, the shops, and the characters are all handled spectacularly, making it not only an excellent movie, but also a visual feast for the eyes. DEFINITELY a great job on the Visuals of this movie. The Storyline of this movie, as you all know, was done very well by the author of the books, J.K. Rowling, and definitely makes for an awesome movie as everything about it was handled brilliantly for the onscreen adaptation of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince." DEFINITELY a great job on the Storyline of this movie. The Acting ties everything about this movie together. All of the Actors and Actresses deliver performances as characters that are VERY Convincing, VERY Believable, and VERY Realistic, while at the same time delivering performances as characters that you can really FEEL FOR, and maybe, in some small instances, RELATE TO, on VARIOUSLY different levels. DEFINITELY a great job on the Casting of this movie. So if you're a fan of everything to do with "Harry Potter," then I definitely recommend that you see this movie as soon as possible. It is DEFINITELY one of the best movies in the entire series. So give it a try. I'm almost POSITIVE that you will NOT get disappointed with it in the SLIGHTEST. I know I didn't!!!!!

Page: of 2 Total Pages

43 Comments


August 10th, 2009 9:50pm
Thanks!
  (Delete)
August 10th, 2009 9:35pm
Very awesome review. This one is definitely one of the greatest of the series.
  (Delete)
August 3rd, 2009 11:15am
Great review! I have to agree with "The Dark Knight" down there. You are definitely going places.
  (Delete)
July 31st, 2009 6:45am
HP6 is the worst movie of the Franchise
  (Delete)
July 25th, 2009 12:57am
one of the worst hp movies ever there was no good action the only action i saw in the movie was dumbeldore chocking on some water
  (Delete)
July 20th, 2009 7:29pm
Thank you. :D
  (Delete)
July 20th, 2009 4:48pm
YEAH!! Awesome review. The Dark Knight was spot on.
  (Delete)
July 19th, 2009 10:32pm
Lolz. Why thank you. :D
  (Delete)
July 19th, 2009 8:45pm
badass review just by looking at the size of it EPIC I still have to see it Ive only read a little bit of it, but You SIR IS GOING PLACES IN THE FUTURE!
  (Delete)
July 18th, 2009 10:09am
No problem. They HAVE been hinting Ron and Hermione since "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets," if you notice the small things. When Hermione is unpetrified, she comes running into the hall, and hugs Harry, but when she goes to hug Ron, he's too uncomfortable for it, and shakes her hand instead. Then in "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban," during the part with Buckbeak, Buckbeak snips at Harry at first, and Hermione grabs Ron's hand. They notice soon enough, and both look away uncomfortably. Then like you said throughout "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" and "Harry Potter and Order of the Phoenix." I hope you enjoy the movie tomorrow.
  (Delete)
July 18th, 2009 12:14am
I guess I can understand Lucius' absence from HP6. After all, he did get captured by Dumbledore in the Hall of Mysteries with the rest of the Death Eaters at the end of HP5. All except that elusive Bellatrix LeStrange, that is. So in HP6, he and the other Death Eaters who were captured in the previous movie must be imprisoned in Azkaban. I don't expect Lucius to be in every movie, as he wasn't in 1 and 3 but since HP4 his mask is off forever and his loyalty to Voldemort and the Dark Arts has been revealed, and he must play an importance to the coming battles. He is after all, the Leader of the Death Eaters (or so it would seem in the conclusion to HP5).

As far as your explanation goes, no, I do not have any questions, lol, you explained it pretty well, and I looked up character bios on Wikipedia which gave me better insight to the backstory. I am excited at the prospect of the "relationship" quality the HP6 film will posess, and have been looking forward to the Harry/Ginny romance which has been hinted at since HP1: Sorcerer's Stone when Ginny was too young to be shipped off to Hogwarts. Even though I largely overlooked her character until HP5: Order of the Phoenix when she was eyeballing Potter through most of that film. As far as the Ron/Hermoine relationship, I don't feel like that was built up enough in the series (films, not books), enough to be justified just yet. They have been friends, and not really shared intimate moments or hints of attraction save a few exceptions such as the Yule Ball dance in HP4 and a little in HP5. I don't expect a resolution to that until Deathly Hallows. I'm more for the wizard/witch collaboration between Harry and Hermoine, which I've been waiting to witness Hermoine's true power as "the brightest witch of her age." I hope to see a move towards that.

Thanks for your prompt response. I'm going to see the film tomorrow.
  (Delete)
July 17th, 2009 10:43am
Like I said, it was pretty dark of a film. Especially since it's a PG movie.
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 11:58pm
Considering that film 5 was semi dark by the end turnout and Umbridge, and the fact that film 7 will be the darkest with no resolution and film 8 being also dark for not being very lighthearted, then perhaps they cut down the dark stuff here in favor of not having 4 dark chapters in a row?
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 8:46pm
Lucius Malfoy is not in this movie, sorry to disappoint. This movie was more of a focus on Draco. Lucius was in disgrace, and I'm pretty sure he wasn't in the book very much at all. As far as the original Order of the Phoenix goes, it was Dumbledore's creation to fight off Voldemort the first time around. It consisted of many people whose names I can't remember at the moment, but prominent among them are Albus Dumbledore, Alastor "Mad-Eye" Moody, Lupin, Lily and James Potter, Sirius Black, and Frank and Alice Longbottom (Whom Bellatrix Lestrange drove mad with the Cruciatus Curse"). Peter Pettigrew, at the very least, was THOUGHT to be a friend of Lily and James. He was their secret keeper. In essence, he was the one who withheld the whereabouts of Lily and James Potter when they went into hiding. Only he knew, and only he could tell. He told Voldemort, thus breaking the secret keeper spell, and Voldemort came and killed them, then tried for Harry, but failed. He went after them, of course, because the Prophecy said that neither Harry nor Voldemort could live while the other one did. Meaning, one had to die in order for the other to live.

Any questions? lmfao.
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 7:36pm
VERY good review, as always, Vamp. Epic, in this case. I like how you didn't touch on the plot of the movie even though that's what I was looking forward to most. "HP: OtP" brought the beginning of the wiardry battles into the fold with the Dark vs. Light theme, and I am more than 90% expecting more of that this time around for "HP: HBP." With OoTP, the rebellion has started and the war has begun (at the end, no doubt). HBP should bring us smack-dab into the continuation of this war. Lucius should have a bigger role as Voldemort's follower, and I know his son does, even though I seem to think he will switch sides to the Order.

I haven't read the books and therefore I can't claim to know what's going to come, but as you say, this film is a pedestal of the series. Ginny makes a good match for Harry, I for one hated that Asian chick from GoF who Harry shared his first kiss with. Glad she was kicked out of the Order, she was weak anyway.

One other thing I must ask you Vamp. I must have missed some vital points of the series. I saw all except 2 and 3 in the cinemas, but can you enlighten me on the "old" Order of the Phoenix involving Harry's parents? Who was exactly Harry's parent's circle of friends? And how did that story go down, as far as the betrayal and Valdemort's role? Harry's p's were powerful, no doubt, and obviously were some sort of threat to Valdemort. My friend told me that Peter Pettigrew was the "hitman" who murdered them, but I thought Voldemort killed the parents? I'm kinda lost. Was Pettigrew their friend, well, he must have been, cuz Sirius Black told him he would have rather died than betray them.

CBF
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 10:51am
It's dark alright. It wasn't completely focused on the lovey dovey. It had enough of it to make it one of the big factors of the movie, just like it was in the book. I look forward to reading it. I'll be on again later tonight, but I've just remembered that I still need to read your "Hellboy" and "Hellboy II: The Golden Army" reviews. Look for comments later tonight. lmfao!!!!!
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 10:39am
I guess you're right about that. It is unrealistic to compare with filmed adaptations of any book nowadays unless it's a miniseries. I was just hoping that this one had a much darker theme throughout the whole thing. My first HP review will be written and posted on Saturday Morning.
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 10:20am
Thanks everyone. Like I said, Sly, you can come up with your own judgments. They omitted some stuff, but not as much as they did with "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," and everyone seems to think that one was so excellent. I don't really care what they leave out. I mean, it disappoints, but I don't compare it to the book. Otherwise, I'll always be disappointed. They didn't FOCUS all on the Lovey Dovey stuffy, either. Lavender and Ron's affair was a very big part of the book, and Hermione's problem with it was, too.
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 9:44am
lolz! Good one MB!

Oh and yeah, V2K, great review. But if all I've read in subsequent reviews are true, then I bet I'll disagree with it. I may or may not see it on Sunday, or Monday before leaving for the Tetons on Tuesday-Friday of next week. Though I'll post all 6 HP flick reviews as #s 141-146. I'll have the first 5 up by Monday morning.
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 8:37am
Huh??? So because Vamp gave it 5 stars and you agree, the review "must" be accurate? haha

That's funny. So if he had given it 2 stars and hated it.... then it wouldn't have been accurate?
  (Delete)
July 16th, 2009 12:03am
didn't read the review, i saw u gave it 5 stars in all categories and i knew the review must be accurate. fucking awesome movie.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 9:25pm
Great review Vamp. I can't wait to see it this weekend.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 9:17pm
Plus they supposedly changed up locations of the horcruxes, and excluded others entirely, giving Harry absolutely no direction as to how to find them come films 7&8. Why they omitted those major plot requirements is unknown. But I agree MB, how HP book fans love this film with all the damn omissions of the REAL point in the story is beyond me. And by jinx, I meant that after a great trip to SF, something bad must follow, vice versa as it always is with me. hahaha.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 8:34pm
There sure is a lot of "DEFINITELY"s out there haha.

Nice (and by "nice" I mean LONG) review again Vamp haha.

Seriously, nice review, but I just don't think its that great of a film. Its just good. I think they focused on the wrong plot and didn't answer enough questions.

I am actually surprised you enjoyed it so much. Most Potter "readers" hated it because the film ommitted too much. That's not my complaint, but I definitely had a problem with it. I just hope they get back on track on the next installment and focus on Voldemort instead of all the luvy duvy stuff.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 8:33pm
Is it true? Are there only 3 flashbacks? just 3????????? Not even the murders by Riddle or the dilemma at his mother's house?? really??? Oh god, I may actually skip this. And yeah, you and I coulda done a better job st this being fans of the books.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 7:58pm
Well you can pass your own judgement Sly. Thanks, Psycho.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 7:42pm
and did they cut out "The Other Minister?" That was a great first chapter in the book. If they did that too, as well as divert focus from V to love crap, then it'll be bad. And #5 needs a serious do over.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 7:37pm
I heard that they focused WAY TOO MUCH screentime on the lovy dovy bullshit instead of the real, and ONLY point of interest in this story, being Tom Riddle's slow transformation into Voldemort, as well as his horcruxes. From what I read on MovieBuff's review, I hope the film doesn't do that. This after all is "The Empire Strikes Back" of the HP book series. If they fucked that up in the film, then I doubt it'll be good. And given that MovieBuff isn't a Harry Potter buff, then I'll for now take his word as a more mainstream opinion versus one of a die hard fan--no offense, but it's the same way with me and Star Wars. If I ever write a review for it, I'm afraid many will disagree with my ratingd for the prequels, such that they'll think I'm treating the films unfairly on a mainstream scale.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 4:46pm
Nice review. I heard that the movie does not follow the book.
  (Delete)
July 15th, 2009 4:14pm
Thanks, man! You won't be disappointed whatsoever.
  (Delete)
Page: of 2 Total Pages

5
  Stars
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: July 15th, 2009
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

4 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
4 Stars
Viewing
32 of 36