Turn Advertising Off
 
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

BABYLON A.D. (2008)

"You'll be leaving the theater scratching your head and wondering "What just happened?""

Sometimes I go to a theater to watch a movie with low expectations because many times I end up pleasantly surprised. However, there are times that the movie reaches those low expectations... and this is one of them.

The first 45 minutes of the movie is actually not that bad. Although we've seen the premise many times before, its still quite exciting. The first half of the movie takes us through the old journey of our heroes trying to get from point A to point B with many villains trying to stop them. Bombs explode, gun play ensues, people die,... the whole works. Its once they get to where they're going that'll leave you scratching your head wondering "what just happened?".

Vin Diesel plays a mercenary named Toorop in our near future. He's paid to take a young girl named Aurora from Central Asia to New York City in 6 days. Like any typical mercenary, he doesn't ask any questions except... how much are you gonna pay me? Little does he know that his package is actually a package within a package. If that doesn't confuse you, then the ending will. Guaranteed.

Like I said, the movie starts rather well... it's the second half that's just plain crap. There's a point where some important characters DIE but are miraculously brought back to life... and they really don't explain how they did it. I was lost at this point. Also, there's no resolution to the movie or if their was one, their pathetic excuse for it was terrible. The finale sets up a possible sequel which this movie absolutely does not merit. The ending was actually laughable (people actually laughed in the theater as they left the building... I'm not kidding) that is... if you weren't already asleep with boredom.

The acting wasn't half bad. Diesel played his character well and it fit him to a tea. Michelle Yeoh and Melanie Thierry were good in their roles as well. And there were some actors that did such a good job that I almost (emphasize almost) didn't recognize them. Gerard Depardieu and Lambert Wilson (the Merovingian in the Matrix 2) appear in this movie and I almost missed them. I actually didn't recognize them and found out who they were after... but shhhh, don't tell anyone, okay? We'll keep it our little secret.

The Director, Mathieu Kassovitz, should NEVER be allowed behind a camera again. He immediately began dissing this movie as soon as he was done... but I think it was to cover his ass for his sloppy work. What has he ever done? His most famous work is Gothika and look how that one turned out. It was shit... even though he had the talents of Halle Berry, Robert Downey Jr, Charles S. Dutton, and Penelope Cruz. He's horrible. His ending of this movie reminds me of the ending of the original Terminator. Hell... he even stole the line: "There's a storm coming". Freaking thief!

If the plot to this movie was getting Aurora to New York City... and that's it... the movie would have been like 50 minutes long, but it would have been decent. Of course, we would have never known WHY she was sent there, but I would rather have seen THAT story (as short as it may be) than the one we got.

I don't recommend this movie for an evening show... for a matinee show... a dollar theater... of even a rental. Save your money and wait til they show it on TBS or some other cable station. After seeing this movie, I feel bad I gave the Mummy 3 a one star... cause its much better than this crapola.

26 Comments


September 3rd, 2008 3:32pm
hahaha knew this movie was gonna b crap. im so glad i broke up with my x so i dont hafta smell ne more of diesels stinkers ha
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 10:09pm
Good review!

Yup! It was really that bad!
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 6:20pm
Oh no I wanted to see this man It suck dang it. It look so much like a remake of blade runner. oh well
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 1:49pm
I wasn't really planning on seeing this just because the action in the commercials didn't impress me, and the story looked too confusing. I'll probably still see it eventually though.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 1:18pm
I thought Get Smart was quite funny, contrary to what I thought, and Tropical Thunder was fucking hilarious, but it was another movie I thought wouldn't be funny, just like the critics said, but I disagree, now.

BlizZzard
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 12:52pm
What you think about Get Smart and Tropic Thunder? I reviewed the latter but not Smart... i wasn't a member yet when it came out. But I'll review it soon.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 12:26pm
yeah you should i gave up my sw fu script and writing max payne sequel. so if the movie fails the next one will rock. that is if my script comes out..lol
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 12:15pm
But I meant it like that, just joking, I just wanted to clear some stuff up, I dont really care though

I actually just saw Get Smart on Friday and Tropic Thunder yesterday, and as far as this weeks shit, I don't won't nor have seen anything new out, my week is next week, for movies, I want to see Lakeview Terrace, Burn After Reading, and Righteous Kill, and I fucking still have to see Mirrors, but these people, in my house, keep on vetoing it, so I will have to see it by myself.

BlizZzard
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 12:00pm
Blizz.. you just wrote "and I use sub-par more as bad even though it means average" and you also wrote "to say par it would be better than average". Both statements are wrong. Par means "standard or average"... sub-par means "below average", not what you just stated. And... I AM a golfer and you totally used the double-bogey comment perfectly haha.

Anyway... I've got a good rapport with you and I enjoy our conversations so I don't want to argue over petty stuff like a freaking definition of a word haha. I know what you meant when you said it so it is totally my fault for correcting you. And I'm sorry I did it again. haha I know for a fact we're both intelligent people so.... again... let's just drop the whole par thing and talk movies.

Which of these weekend's movies have you seen? Whatever you decide.. don't go see the above piece of shit. haha
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 11:48am
Moviebuff, I knew what sub-par meant, I wouldn't use it if I didn't know what it meant, that would be a falsehood on my part, when I was said I don't even know, what fully par means, its because its not a real saying, and I use sub-par more as bad even though it means average, I don't see average as good, not in any way, so that's where that came from, and to say par it would be better than average, so in the terms how I would use the wording would be backwards. I'm not a golfer and the two don't relate, but I was thinking in that aspect of golf, so maybe I should have said a double bogie, but it doesn't matter, you know what I meant, and directors like that, are ruining it for future prospect, because they go to studios pitching these horrible ideas, but they will get the greenlight more times then not, then someone new with new ideas, who don't get a chance.

BlizZzard
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 11:30am
JR.... so should i start calling you Max now? haha ;)
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 11:30am
even i was lookin a little bit foward to this, at least i get to wacth Traitor, and ur right moviebuff, in the trailer the S/Fx looked like it sucked
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 10:26am
Yea whenever, the point was, I wasn't old enough to have cared about it. lol. It was before I got big into movies. I really want to watch that again, lolz.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 10:22am
and saying bad stuff.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 10:14am
i changed it due to the fact there is a poser with my name.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 9:15am
What a shame about this film. When I first heard about it, I thought it seemed quite interesting, but I've not heard anything positive about this film at all. Vin Diesel's career seems to have been in reverse for quite some time now, and it looks like this project has given him a push in the wrong direction. May not be all his own fault for that, but it can't do his future prospects any good. I'll probably watch this at some point, but later rather than sooner. Much later.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 8:42am
Good review, I agree the movie was total garbage. I saw it at an evening show and I saw at least six people walk out. I was hating it too but knew I wouldn't get my $9 back so I stuck it out.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 7:57am
Vamp... Gothika was released in 2003... so you were TWELVE yrs old haha

Blizzard... you're right. I'm probably blaming the wrong person. The Director may NOT be totally at fault because it was the story that went to shit after the first 40 minutes. THAT is not the director's fault.. it's the writers. But how can I have respect for a guy who's only real credibiltiy is Gothika and starts dissing his own movie? Oh... and "par" means average... so by saying "its not even sub-par, it just fucking fully-par"... you actually made it better, not worse. Your statement actually means"its not even sub-average, its just fucking fully-average" haha It's cool though... I think we ALL know what you meant. And you're right.

Visionary... I heard Traitor is a good movie as well. that's my next movie. Hopefully, I'll have a review sometime late Monday.

JR.... I'm sure you enjoyed Death Race much more than you would have this movie. Good Call. And why did you change your user name? Wanna start fresh with a new name? If that's the case, it's not the name that needs to be changed... it's the attitude. Your cool, you just accuse too many people of being someone else and they just don't like that. Hope this works out cause like I said... youre still cool with me.

Crypt... glad I saved you some money bud. It might still be worth a looksee, but not for the price of admission to a theater. THAT is just a waste of money. Save it for gas... the way the prices are going up on that, you'll need it. haha

Nerd.... you're right. I just told Blizzard my take on that. Sometimes the studio and the director don't see eye to eye and the executives screw things up for the director. But what can you do? The Studio pays for the movie... it's THEIR movie to do what they wish.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 7:24am
I Will not be seeing this. But it wasnt the directors fault. The studio Fox cut out most of the dialouge and story.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 7:06am
Man, I know you don't recommend this movie... even on DVD, but I am curious, so I will still see it. But YOU and the others who wrote reviews for this saved me from seeing this in the theater. But you. moviebuff, are the one who made me say "forget it!"
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 6:46am
good review glad i didnt see this. i went to death race.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 4:59am
I had high hopes for this, but now I won't be seeing it. Traitor looks good, though
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 2:02am
Hey MovieBuff, check what I wrote on Ramasscreen Review of this movie to see what I already said.

I've been thinking we all keep on talking about the director, maybe its the writers we need to start attacking they seem to be the ones writing the bad shit, and then leaves it all to the director to bring to life, becoming a future director myself, I have chosen to write my own movies, just I know the quality of the work, but if I do have a writer their will probably be rewrites.

I also agree with the Gothika part even though it contradicts my proceeding statement, I original thought she was being trick, or that it was all in her head, I did like the twist of Gothika, but that twist was ruined by the ending, inconsistencies in movies are killers. I also don't like the fact that he's shit talking his own movie, like I've been saying the true movie makers/lovers are dying out, and the "paper chasers" have been on the rise, its sub-par, matter of fact its not even sub-par, it just fucking fully-par (I don't even know what the hell that is).

the movie sounds stupid, and the same old shit, we need more twist and different movie concepts, like it use to be, it not that hard to be somewhat original, and speaking of that isn't that the name of an old Sci-Fi show, oh never mind that was Babylon 5, but that still brings the question " What the fuck is that name about what dose it mean?"

BlizZzard
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 12:26am
I should watch it again, and then write a review for it. I just remember saying, what a great movie. This was of course back a few years, what was it 2001? I would've been, what? Ten? lolz.
  (Delete)
September 1st, 2008 12:04am
Vamp... you may have enjoyed it at the time... but a good movie is a memorable one. You just said you don't remember much... same here. I remember Halle driving, almost hitting the little girl (ghost)... but I really don't remember what the story really was about.

I may have been too harsh with the word sucked, but it really was not that good.
  (Delete)
August 31st, 2008 11:57pm
Great review, I thought this movie looked great, and I probably will end up seeing it, just out of curiosity. I do have to disagree with you on one point, and that's where you said Gotika sucked, I actually really enjoyed that movie, though I don't remember much, just that I enjoyed it. Anyway, great review, and I now know to wait and rent it on DVD. Thanks. :)
  (Delete)

1
  Star
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: September 1st, 2008
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

2 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
2 Stars
Viewing
7 of 11