Turn Advertising Off
 
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL (2008)

"The Day the Earth Stood Still" has some good action and a somewhat interesting story but the rest is a bore."

"The Day the Earth Stood Still" is a remake of the 1951 classic but this version definitely doesn't deserve the classic title. Don't get me wrong the film is good but it could have been much better. I left the theater expecting more.

It begins with a man who is in the Indian mountains. It is snowing when the man stumbles upon a big glowing sphere. We then jump to the present. A woman is picked up at her house by the police. They won't tell her where she is going or why she must go with them. We soon find out why. An object is flying towards Earth and they fear that it will destroy most of Manhattan. The object, which turns out to be the same sphere from the mountains, lands. A man emerges from the sphere and he is taken in to custody. The man, who is the same man from the mountains, is asked many questions by the authorities. He asks to be released but they will not listen so he must take matters into his own hands. He breaks out but he is in need of help so he calls the woman.

This is where the plot starts to slow down and become a little bit of a snoozer. They go on the run with the help of the woman, her son and some of her friends. He warns her that the human race might come to an end. She must convince him to stop what he is doing and stop the being that may help destroy the human race. The plot picks up again and the fun starts. It is a race against time that will lead to a satisfying ending.

The story is, like I said, interesting. It is a remake so it isn't very original but they make a few changes to the main plot. The beginning and the end are entertaining but the middle is kind of boring. They don't really explain everything so you really don't know what's going on thus there are a few flaws in the script but nothing major.

The acting is good but the actors who do the best job are underused. Keanu Reeves does a fine job playing the man from the sphere. I don't really see the complaint about his acting job in this because the character he plays is supposed to show no emotion and care for no one so I think he did a great job in this. Jennifer Connelly plays the woman and does okay. Some of her scenes are unbelievable and don't seem like something her character would do. Now to the actors who are completely underused. Robert Knepper, Brandon T. Jackson and Kyle Chandler who all play military men are good actors but they don't even get enough time to show off there acting chops. I was really disappointed about that.

Director Scott Derrickson does great at making the film have a cool look to it but I didn't like the pacing. He should have stayed true to the original and I think they would have produced a better film.

The visuals are off and on. I thought the sphere looked very cool and realistic but I thought the monster who might destroy the Earth looked kind of fake. The look to the film is good thanks to the director.

So in conclusion "The Day the Earth Stood Still" is a good film that may disappoint some but will probably entertain the rest.

29 Comments


December 19th, 2008 5:18pm
yeah trust Vis on that 1 if ne one an expert on "Whacking off" its him hahahahahaha
  (Delete)
December 19th, 2008 11:12am
WOW! And here comes JR on his trusty steed of bullshit! What a remarkable way of attacking someone for no reason other than for the sake of attacking someone! Seriously, you have to ask yourself, "Am I gonna cause a ruckus today even when I pretended to not 'like the fighting?' I'm not nitpicking whether or not the human race had to be destroyed, I just enjoyed the movie. Go read the Bible and fuck yourself, which, ironically, would kind of cancel each other out, seeing as how God doesn't like you to "whack off"...on a side note, he doesn't like you to lie, steal, and curse, either, which you do in spades
  (Delete)
December 19th, 2008 10:29am
very nitpicky? is'nt that you vis?
  (Delete)
December 19th, 2008 8:49am
...who are you yelling at?
  (Delete)
December 19th, 2008 7:36am
SHUT THE HELL UP YOU ASSHOLE!, I'M MORE SERIOUS THAN YOU, I'M GONNA HOOK UP MY CAMERA, TAKE A PICTURE OF MY VERY SERIOUS FACE AND I'M GONNA SNED IT TO YOU, YOU FRIGGIN' PIECE OF S***!.
  (Delete)
December 18th, 2008 1:06pm
there are some boring movies I like and this might be one
  (Delete)
December 18th, 2008 11:40am
naw buff, havent went 2 c this 1 yet, although my brother did and said that it was worth the eight bucks 2 c the trailers 4 terminator 2012 and wolverine. go figure huh?
  (Delete)
December 16th, 2008 7:22pm
nice review. WAS planning on seeing it. lol
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 7:27pm
i liked the movie. chck oiut my review movienerd.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 6:20pm
Once again man good review. I was kind of undecided about seeing this in theaters after reading a few bad reviews. Might have to catch this one on Saturday night after work.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 2:05pm
Great review. Sounds like I won't walk out of the film thinking I wasted my money, which is good. lol A bit disappointing to hear the visuals are "on and off", tho. I'd expect alot more from this genre of film.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 1:57pm
Now YOU are nitpicking Vis haha. Fact is annihilating the human race would not be necessary... period. It would take us a pretty freaking long time to "rebuild". If shuttin us down didn't work... THEN and ONLY THEN... do they annihilate us for not learning our lesson. Anyway... I liked the beginning, the premise, and the message they TRIED to get accross... but it was boring. Sorry if you don't agree... its just my take.

But at least I gave the movie a chance unlike my buddy Blaze. You didn't walk out of the movie, did you Blaze?
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 1:14pm
nice review bub. very 2 the point an u touched on the points that worked an didint work. as 4 the movie in general...hmm wel i walked out after the wolverine trailer was over...haha kudos 2 u 4 staying 4 the whole movie
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 1:09pm
ALSO, they wanted to save the planet, NOT us. They wanted to kill us. If they didn't threaten them with being annihilated and just shut everything down to begin with, then we might feel the need to "rebuild" and shit on the planet some more. Like Cleese's character says, "civilizations change when they are threatened with destruction" or something like that. The lil nanite bugs threatened their destruction, so maybe if everything's shut down, they won't try to fuck up the Earth some more, because you know we always find a way lol
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 1:01pm
I wasn't implying that EVERYONE won't be bored, I just said I wasn't. I think you're overthinking it too much...very nitpicky. "Why did they have to kill the human race?" Because it makes for a better movie, that's why. Besides, the message the movie was trying to make wouldn't have gotten through if they didn't want to kill us...we're THAT terrible that an advanced civilization wants to kill us even if they can shut us down.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 12:25pm
Cool review,but i dint like it too much.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 11:12am
Oh yea... and another thing... why did the advanced race feel the need to destroy the human race? Why kill the human race if they can render us technologically defenseless? Just shut us down. Turn all of our energy off and we're done. We can't do a damn thing to the planet without all our crap. They didn't have to kill the human race.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 11:03am
VIS.... I DID read your review... and I know YOU weren't bored. Doesn't mean it wasn't boring to many others... including me.

And I knew what was going on... it was explained very well in the film. My question was to Movienerd... not you guys. He's the one that wrote "They don't really explain everything so you really don't know what's going on thus there are a few flaws in the script but nothing major"... not you. I was simply asking him if he REALLY thought that was nothing major.

Buzz... it has nothing to do with being openminded. This had to do with being entertained. It just didn't do it for me.... and MANY others. But every movie will find their audience... even the crappy ones. Believe it or not... there were few (and I do mean FEW) who enjoyed Superhero Movie.... but that doesn't mean its a good movie just because a few enjoyed it.

Glad you guys liked the movie... but its really NOT that good. Just a below average movie (in my opinion)
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 9:55am
BTW GOOD REVIEW LOL!!!
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 9:54am
MB i do not agree this movie was really good i guess you guys have to be more open minded but maybe you guys expected more then what i did but okay i guess everyone has there choices !
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 6:36am
Of course the movie is boring. That's what scifi is all about. I sometimes like to go see movies, hoping that there won't be a whole lot of death or destruction, but instead have it ease up a bit and listen to the characters talk.

And what parts weren't explained thoroughly? I thought everything was explained very well, and I should know, I was sitting there watching and listening to the movie.

I'm kinda glad that Hollywood isn't focusing on a lot of action scenes or focusing on a lot of CGI shots.
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 5:27am
Thanks for your honest review, very well written
  (Delete)
December 15th, 2008 4:20am
I wasn't bored with the movie at all. MB, read my review already! ;)

And how did you not know what was going on? You must have been sleeping from the "boredom." I was very entertained with this movie, not just because of the FX. It was done well, the whole movie was. People say that Klaatu's message doesn't get to the public like the first one, but he doesn't need to make a speech...all of Earth's electonic devices and technology are busted. Even if we wanted to destroy the Earth, we couldn't lol
  (Delete)
December 14th, 2008 9:23pm
One question.... You say: "They don't really explain everything so you really don't know what's going on thus there are a few flaws in the script but nothing major."....

Do you really think not knowing what's going on is "nothing major"?

I think the couple of CGI scenes with GORT and the little bugs eating away at the world influenced you to give this movie a better rating than it deserves. Just my opinion. The movie started off interesting until his escape... than it became BOREDOM HELL.

You're right... they could've done much better.
  (Delete)
December 14th, 2008 9:03pm
Good reveiw man. Very insightful !!
  (Delete)
December 14th, 2008 7:53pm
Great review, man. I think I will try to check this one closer to Christmas.
  (Delete)
December 14th, 2008 6:58pm
Great review.
  (Delete)
December 14th, 2008 5:29pm
Nice review.Well thought out,I have not seen the movie yet,but I think 3.5 is were this movie should be rated.I think some may have expected to much.Althought the previews did lead you to that point.
  (Delete)
December 14th, 2008 5:18pm
I really liked this. Good reveiw.
  (Delete)

3.5
  Stars
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: December 14th, 2008
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

2 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
3 Stars
Viewing
22 of 34