"Not better then the first two."
Not better then the first two but was still worth seeing. This movie was not what I excepted. I thought this was going to be better then the first two but no it was not.
Sam Raimi was not at his best directing the film and don't know why he chose to have 3 villians in the movie but the villians were great.
The Sandman was a good choice for this movie and has a good story towards him so great job Sam Raimi. Sandman well he is made of sand obviously and can make almost about anything with himself but into sand.
New Goblin was a horrible choice and don't know if Sam wanted to change the name but in the comics his name was suppose to be Hop Gobblin so not so great job Sam Raimi. They should not have put him as a villian but they had to because of the ending to Spider-Man 2 so they just had to. I guess it is like father, like son.
Venom was a great choice for the villian and awesome to watch but did not come out until towards the end. Good choice for the character Sam but not so good as a choice for actor Topher Grace. Why would you pick him as Venom who is one of the best villians ever created and now you put a comedian to play Venom. Not so good Sam.
The rest were great exceot when Peter turns all emo and crap like that and not to mention it was sort of kind of long and boring.
This movie a descent movie so I gave it a descent 3 stars. Can't wait for the 4 th installment and hope to see Lizard and Carnage in the next one. I think they should have made it into a trilogy.
26 Comments
I know you meant spidey, though, TDK. LOL.
just kidding vamp.
The only thing that burn my biscuits about Spidey 3 was how little time Venom was used, I would have liked to seen more Gwen Stacy.