Turn Advertising Off
 
    DVD News      DVD Release Dates      HD/Blu-Ray Release Dates      UMD Release Dates      Easter Eggs      DVD Reviews      Blu-Ray Reviews      HDDVD Reviews

"Not better then the first two."

Not better then the first two but was still worth seeing. This movie was not what I excepted. I thought this was going to be better then the first two but no it was not.

Sam Raimi was not at his best directing the film and don't know why he chose to have 3 villians in the movie but the villians were great.

The Sandman was a good choice for this movie and has a good story towards him so great job Sam Raimi. Sandman well he is made of sand obviously and can make almost about anything with himself but into sand.

New Goblin was a horrible choice and don't know if Sam wanted to change the name but in the comics his name was suppose to be Hop Gobblin so not so great job Sam Raimi. They should not have put him as a villian but they had to because of the ending to Spider-Man 2 so they just had to. I guess it is like father, like son.

Venom was a great choice for the villian and awesome to watch but did not come out until towards the end. Good choice for the character Sam but not so good as a choice for actor Topher Grace. Why would you pick him as Venom who is one of the best villians ever created and now you put a comedian to play Venom. Not so good Sam.

The rest were great exceot when Peter turns all emo and crap like that and not to mention it was sort of kind of long and boring.

This movie a descent movie so I gave it a descent 3 stars. Can't wait for the 4 th installment and hope to see Lizard and Carnage in the next one. I think they should have made it into a trilogy.

26 Comments


June 21st, 2009 10:19pm
In the comics it is not Hobgoblin, Harry becomes Green Goblin II in every comic I have read. Hobgoblin was Robert Kingsley and a few others, not Harry, he was always the second Green Goblin. Good attempt at a review. Rating was perfect.
  (Delete)
September 22nd, 2008 4:02pm
I hate when people confuse goth with emo that is two different shit.
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 10:09pm
well I knew that lol I just thought that ....nvm I already knew all of that lol rock rules lol classic rock for me though
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 10:04pm
No, Goth people just wear black a lot, listen to rock, and are generally loners... The devil worship stereotype pisses me off like none other.
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 9:50pm
then what do goth people do????
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 9:49pm
no, Dark Knight
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 9:41pm
yeah I know emos cut them selves and goths are into...the devil???? :/
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 9:39pm
I'm goth. I hate it when people confuse the two....

I know you meant spidey, though, TDK. LOL.
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 9:34pm
he was emo as hell
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 9:04pm
ya, dont wanna make your reviews as long as vamps! lol

just kidding vamp.
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 8:17pm
I'd give this a four because I liked it as well. Great review.
  (Delete)
September 21st, 2008 8:08pm
Thanks Crypt i did not want to write too much though.
  (Delete)
September 19th, 2008 6:51pm
well, i think its a good length for a review.
  (Delete)
September 19th, 2008 6:41pm
Good review. This was probably better than the first but not as good as Spider-man 2.
  (Delete)
September 19th, 2008 5:38pm
I thought it was descent and thanks for the comment as well Crypt but I will make my reviews more better and longer.
  (Delete)
September 19th, 2008 9:55am
good review, Psycho. your best yet. but i would give this one a 4. i knda liked it
  (Delete)
September 18th, 2008 8:23pm
Thanks Flrep 07. I hated when Peter turns emo.
  (Delete)
September 18th, 2008 7:17pm
dude, the Hob Goblin was NOT Harry Osborn, well at least not in the animated series. But either way, i think the movie was awesome. I agree with the Topher Grace comment, they should have gotten more of a badass guy to play him.. but w.e. I still really enjoyed it. i wrote a review about it a long time ago, if you havent read it. again, nice review.
  (Delete)
September 18th, 2008 6:13pm
I also want to see Scorpion.
  (Delete)
September 18th, 2008 6:08pm
I also want to see Scorpion.
  (Delete)
September 18th, 2008 4:21pm
Who doen't want to see him..lol.
  (Delete)
September 18th, 2008 9:08am
yaaaaaaaaaa! i hope to see Carnage as well, obviously.
  (Delete)
September 17th, 2008 7:50pm
She should just died in the next movie.
  (Delete)
September 17th, 2008 7:34pm
They should make Gwen a main character in the next film and show her death in the 5th.
  (Delete)
September 17th, 2008 5:44pm
Your right it's not better than the first 2, my favorite so far is Spider-man 2. I'd like to see Lizard by himself or bring in Black Cat. Carnage should have his own movie.

The only thing that burn my biscuits about Spidey 3 was how little time Venom was used, I would have liked to seen more Gwen Stacy.
  (Delete)
September 17th, 2008 5:18pm
Great review but I would give this atleast 2 stars. It's not the best. The best is Spider Man 2.
  (Delete)

3
  Stars
The Feature:
The Picture:
The Sound:
The Extras:
Replay Value:
Reviewed: September 17th, 2008
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

0 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
3 Stars
Viewing
2 of 3