Will We See Will Smith as Hancock Again?
Smith told the site that he felt there were many characters still to be explored in this world that would be possibly explored in the sequel. It wasn't clear if director Peter Berg or co-stars Charlize Theron and Jason Bateman would return for the second film.
We'll surely keep you posted on any developments on this potential sequel as soon as we have more information.
Hancock was released July 1st, 2008 and stars Will Smith, Charlize Theron, Jason Bateman, Jae Head, Eddie Marsan, David Mattey, Maetrix Fitten, Thomas Lennon. The film is directed by Peter Berg.
Sources: JoBlo
Do you like this story?
RELATED STORIES
(More)Latest News
(More)Recent Activity
-
Corey
rated the news item: 2012 BAFTA Awards Winners
thumbs up
- Corey wrote a comment about the news item 2012 BAFTA Awards Winners
- Corey wrote a comment about his Review of Safe House
- Chuck Dennen rated The Amazing Spider-Man: Trailer 2 5.0 stars
-
Dan
rated the news item: Dracula Year Zero Revived by Universal Pictures
thumbs down
-
Dan
rated the news item: 2012 BAFTA Awards Winners
thumbs up
(More)Most Commented Stories
-
2,549Live Chat the 2011 Oscars as They Happen! Right Now!
-
2,379Bryan Singer Confirmed to Direct Superman: The Man of Steel
-
1,179The Incredible Hulk Trailer Is Here!
-
961LIVE! Chat About Oscar Winners as They're Announced!
-
940EXCLUSIVE: Will Chris Nolan Recast the Joker for Batman 3 or Will the Riddler Take His Place?
(More)Top Rated Stories




Comments (44)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
The CryptKeeper
I, unlike most, would like to see a sequel. I think there is a lot they could do with it.
3 years agoby @catwomanFlag
Mr.Rated-R
Hanc*ck was great and i would definetly go c part 2,
3 years agoby @residentevilfanFlag
LankStun
sh*t i havent even seen the first one yet
3 years agoby @lankstunFlag
Saquin Turok 'X'
I assume another film would explain Hanc*ck's origins better, with the first film being the 'introduction' in a continuing franchise. I'm up for another anyhow.
3 years agoby @teesterxFlag
Err
hanc*ck was alright, it was like junk food for the movie fan.
nothing groundbreaking or awe-inspiring about it, but it was fun enough to kill 90 minutes or so.
i don't think i would see a sequal in the theatre but i would definitely rent it when it comes out.
3 years agoby @err2005Flag
systemof9191
it was ok but the story pissed me off the pairs thing, u think they could have made something better then that
3 years agoby @systemof9191Flag
Moviemaster75
eh... a maybe for me.
3 years agoby @moviemaster75Flag
-comrade-
BTW, when they had the talk about being "made in pairs" who the f*ck made them? Aliens? Because that would be a lot better explanation than some vagaries about angels/gods.
3 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
-comrade-
I too did not appreciate the vague explanation for his powers. I would like to see some kind of Super-Villain. There was this great dynamic in the first one where people openly accepted Hanc*ck as an aspect of life (even when responding negatively) It was better that the movie opened with everything already in play rather than going through an origin story. We could see a whole universe come off of this thing, with new and original characters that might become classics.
3 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
Shadow Of The Day
Great.
3 years agoby @asifFlag
J.A.Ottley.Writer / Director
Yeah really don't care read the proposal for the 2nd film and its sounds complete utter whack, the only thing i would be interesting is Will Smith kicking his dad's ass, rumour has it that the father's role is set to be Freeman but who the hell knows.
I think Will Smith is starting to over-rate himself in the movie industry game.
Confirming films before the studios is just making himself sound ignorant and argogant*
3 years agoby @chronicFlag
Diaigma
Not excited. Will was the only thing good about it.
3 years agoby @diaigmaFlag
SuperCanayaZ
Please no. One is enought. Terrible movie
3 years agoby @supercanayazFlag
denton
this should be better then the first one
3 years agoby @dentonFlag
Josebond007
I think that movie wa just a mvoie for winning money with a bad script and a lot of publicity.
3 years agoby @josebond007Flag
T.Clark
I don't mind if people liked the movie, but calling it "spectacular" just means you need to read a dictionary. Wait, aren't you the same guy who thought Twilight would be "masterful" but gave it 2.5 stars?...hmmm...Learn the definition of words before you blurt them out. I bet you haven't even read Watchmen. Ya wanna know why? Because anybody who reads Watchmen won't think Twilight is "irresistable"...there's another word you need to look up
3 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag
Structure (ONSTRA)
Well I guess the first one was spectacular, I really liked it. but I dunno if the second would be necessary.
3 years agoby @gaj1992Flag
ZanyZap
I liked Hanc*ck. I wouldn't mind seeing another.
{Will Smith is great}.
3 years agoby @zanyzapFlag
comic book guy
The only good thing about "FootPenis" was the brilliant acting done by Jason Bateman. Will Smith was alright but the whole story line about he and Charlize Theron's character being gods or some sh*t that loose there powers when they are close was stupid. Make a sequal keep Bateman, loose Theron and give "FootPenis" a real bad ass foe to fight and you may have somrthing...
3 years agoby @lostone01Flag
Tomp1210
excellent news, it was quite a good film, i didnt like the corny stuff like the stupid french kid and the random lawyer (his friend). But there is serious potential in the next one for an awesome bad guy, more serious in the next one plz.
3 years agoby @tomp1210Flag
-comrade-
I just watched the first one tonight. It was actually a very enjoyable film. Nothing in the way of an epic, but a very human story about a non-human man. Jason Bateman is the real hero in that movie, but Will Smith creates a great character.
3 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
Molemanjoop
I knew it ...
3 years agoby @molemanjupeFlag
They call me ITCHY BALLS
NAH, he's too busy sucking up to producers to play the next president.
3 years agoby @danbrchFlag
Chad Vital
How did you not like Hanc*ck but some of you like Dragonball (in general) or actual stupid sh*t like High School Musicial 3? Wtf? Can we say dumb comments?
3 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
phxman72
THIS MOVIE SUCKED IT WES ALL EMOTION AND NO SUPER VILLIANS WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER HANC*CK FILM
3 years agoby @phxman72Flag
The First Avenger: JohnnyBlaze
hopefully not. the first one sucked ass an a sequel with that arrogant prick will suck even more.
3 years agoby @johnnyblazetb82Flag
GK
come back Will Smith!
3 years agoby @indianajonesFlag
-comrade-
Stil haven't seen Hanc*ck, might be fun.
3 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
Mad_Max
Hanc*ck I thought was a pretty decent "superhero" movie. It was decently written and strayed from the norm of regular superhero movies. I think a sequel would not be as good as the first because the whole premise of the first one was that he was a bum alcoholic superhero who screwed up more than he did good and by the end of the film he rehabilitated himself and was a true superhero. What would the second one be about now that he is sober and actually doing some good?
3 years agoby @mad-max-67878820Flag
Last_Son_Of_Krypton
f*ck'n eh!!!
3 years agoby @last-son-of-kryptonFlag