2 or 3 year old boy to play 2 year old, Caucasian with RED HAIR, an adorable toddler with an engaging personality, on set experience preferred. IDENTICAL TWINS ONLY
Of course, this could be for a much different character in the film, but the emphasis on the red hair of the child is intriguing. Nothing has been confirmed by the studio, so we'll be sure to keep you posted on any updates on this new character in Spider-Man 4 as soon as we have more information.
Spider-Man 4 will go before cameras in March of 2010 for a May 5, 2011 release.
Spider-man 4 is in development .
Comments (37)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
-comrade-
Spider-Kid, Spider-Kid, swinging 'bove the city and pukin' on New Yorkers.
2 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
RavenX5 God of Light
why the hell have a f*cking baby when a bunch of villians are trying to kill Spidey?
2 years agoby @hackx9Flag
Bane5000
KEEPING FINGERS CROSSED: ITS FOR A CARAGE FLASHBACK {UNLIKELY} AND NOT SPIDER-BABY { MORE LIKELY } OH RAIMI DONT GO DOWN THIS ROAD SIR
2 years agoby @bane5000Flag
CBF
It's ALL speculation. There's been no official word from Raimi or the studio about anything, except that Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, J.K. Simmons, and Dylan Baker are returning. I heard that Elizabeth Banks does not want to return as Betty Brant, that she's pretty much done with Spider-Man, but who knows. If she doesn't come back I hope they bring in Glory Grant and not have Hoffman be the replacement like they are saying. Anyways, as I said it'd all speculation except who is returning. We actually have NO IDEA about the plot details, like Felicia or Gwen being side characters either, I mean there's also been no word of Bryce Dallas Howard returning, even though she said she would in a heartbeat if they asked her. I hope some of these RUMORS are true, however, such as Felicia Hardy, but not if they are going to cast Anne Hathaway or some actress of that nature, I would actually rather wait until S-M5 or S-M6 to see her done justice.
Just my thoughts on S-M4. Peace yall.
2 years agoby @comicbookfanFlag
incmob
speculation only fellas. i am taking this with a grain of salt.
2 years agoby @incmobFlag
The Narrator: The Better Man
Lol. Comrade...wtf? That was probably the randomest funniest thing in my entire afternoon. Lol. Nice one man.
And I agree with Chad. It would be pretty cool to see him as Harry's baby with some goblin d.n.a.... 0_o
But we all know that won't happen because the two never slept with each other. I mean not that we've seen.
2 years agoby @narratorFlag
CBF
Could be May Reilly Parker, if it is at all Parker & MJ's, but on behalf of the fans of the franchise: WTF
I mean they haven't even tied up the plot hole of getting married... That will be some BS to introduce May at this point. Wouldn't that be in 6, not 4? LOL I thought Raimi "learned and is taking it back to basics" with 4? One of the mistakes from 3 was TOO MANY CHARACTERS. No, not villains. Characters. Chances are we'll be like, "where did the Stacy's go?" LOL Especially now that it's pretty much been hinted that Ms. Hardy is entering the franchise.
2 years agoby @comicbookfanFlag
silent_reactor99_sx
Have to agree with the fallen-introducing a baby would be f*ckin retarded!
2 years agoby @silent-reactor99-sxFlag
Mutant
If there is a baby involved it'll ruin the image of Spiderman for me. It hurt the Superman film and it can with this one.
Sorry, I didn't mean to bring him up, just trying to point something out.
2 years agoby @zenderFlag
Cozzy09
there will be too many stories in this film, meaning it'll be harder to engage with whats going on. not a good idea at all..
2 years agoby @cozzy09Flag
Chad Vital
And let's be honest, if they do this next film with Carnage, and do it justice, they will redeem themselves in the fans eyes, since Carnage is anothor big fan favorite. I wonder if that's the plan they are going with. If that's the case, it's a very smart move on their part.
2 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
Chad Vital
Lol comrade. That would be great story wise though, if it was Harry's, MJ knows but doesn't tell Peter and he finds out later in the film. That'd be the dramatic part of the film lol. Then the rest would be villian fights haha.
I hope the red head baby is Carnage as a baby... even though it still kinda makes no sense... why would they show a flashback of a toddler? Wouldn't it make more sense to do a flashback of when he was crazy? Or are they going for a Rob Zombie's Halloween Micheal Myers f*cked up childhood in flashbacks? That's the only thing that would make any sense if it were Cletus Kasady (Carnage). The whole being Harry's kid or Peter's kid with MJ makes the most sense. If it's Peter's child, I will not be happy about this lol. It it's Harry's that would be interesting to see, even if it sounds familiar... Pearl Harbor anyone? But anyway, I'm hoping for the Carnage idea. We can dream can't we? And if they say that The Lizard isn't in this film, then the possibilities of Carnage being the main villian is pretty good.
2 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
Marcus-07
Hahahaha nice one,Comrade.
2 years agoby @marcus-07Flag
-comrade-
...with a pumpkin dong.
2 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
-comrade-
MJ is having Harry's child.
He Goblin-f*cked her.
2 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
joekerr2e
K, I'm a little off here. I'm pretty sure they said they've released that Dr. Connors is in this one, but won't appear as Lizard. Am I the only one that saw the Newspaper on the wall behind JJ in SM3 that says, "Doc Ock Returns/or Sited"? Can't remember exact and I'm not watchin' it again anytime soon to get the quote... so he's a possibility eventually. I thought it's also been released that they want a three part storyline with 5&6 being shot back-to-back as one complete story. This leaves the possibility of Carnage and his childhood (flashbacks), but I'd honestly hate to see him introduced, cause there's no way they'll do an "R" rated Spiderman and it would have to be "R" to bring Carnage into the story the right way. I do agree with a couple of things... kill MJ or replace Kirsten Dunst and WTF? Why bring Gwen into SM3 if you're not going to carry her over? That movie already had too much useless sh*t.
Okay, I'm up for anyone to validate or debunk... I'm not 100% sure on the released statements about this movie, so I'm open to hear if anyone else has heard different.
2 years agoby @joekerr2eFlag
Remy72883
defiantly a red box rental then or something I'd consider watching online no way im gonna pay more than a 1.08 to see this
2 years agoby @remy72883Flag
Jimthar
okthis is probably the STUPIDEST idea that i've heard in a long time. after the fiasco that was SM3, you'd think they'd have learned. they need to stop 'adding stuff' to this movie and just bring it back to basics. spidey vs. villains. period. get off MJ, get off all the other unnecessary crap, bring it back to just one villain and make a good movie. why the hell is that so hard?? and a baby?? if that is true then it's WAAAAAYYYYY too early for all that nonsense. just like it was way too early to bring in venom, and we all saw how that turned out. trust me, if this is the way this movie is going to go, then it will suck just like SM3 did.
2 years agoby @jimtharFlag
Cripple
Storm Shadow Slim, I would love to see the sinister six in the final spiderman movie, but they can't. They killed off doc ock.
2 years agoby @crippleFlag
-comrade-
Kill Kirsten Dunst so no Kirsten Dunst.
2 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
GK
Kill MJ so no baby please.
2 years agoby @indianajonesFlag
Solar XI
I'm not big on the Spidey films since the third, which is pretty common on this site. Whether this is true or not, a child is way too soon in this series...especially when they haven't set up Dr. Connors to be Lizard.
I wish they would have stuck to the mythology. Even if Gwen Stacey was in the first film getting killed off by the Green Goblin. That's just me.
What would be nice to see is a set up for a villain in future installments like Electro or Mysterio, possibly Scorpion. I don't know how a Sinister Six film would hold up if they can't even handle three villains. Spider-Man is entertaining to watch but I believe it's too consumed with Mary Jane.
2 years agoby @solarxiFlag
ZanyZap
It sounds to me like there are too many eggs in the same basket. Use one villain, maybe build another the fifth film's baddie on the side, and construct a Spidey film on par with the first two. They need to take the film "back to formula!" All this nonsense about a 'lil Pete swinging through the city needs to be dumped in the Hudson immediately. If done wrong - which face it, is the most plausible outcome - it will only serve as a hindrance to the overall story.
Why don't they just rewrite the sucker for the nineteenth time? ;P
Quick question, are they filming the next two films back-to-back?
2 years agoby @zanyzapFlag
Newkill3000
No baby, no carnage.
2 years agoby @newkill200Flag
Batman Rules !!!
view comicBookMovie.com carnage could be the villain if this baby crap happens. R.i.p mary jane then
2 years agoby @the-fallenFlag
Batman Rules !!!
WOW! What a FUÇKING Stupid ass idea.
2 years agoby @the-fallenFlag
Cripple
No baby please.
2 years agoby @crippleFlag
Flipsyde933
Spidey Jr.
2 years agoby @flipsyde933Flag
ridgl
please no.
what did the babies do to shrek?
2 years agoby @ridglFlag
T.Clark
You want Black Cat...Lizard...Carnage...AND the baby? What?
About the challenge aspect: I thought that at first, too. But don't you think Lizard would be a big enough challenge, both physically and mentally? He's a friend of Peter's...there's your emotional struggle. Or how about the fact that there'll be 3 love interests(assuming the rumor about Cat is true and Gwen comes back)? There's already enough challenges floating around this movie...no need to bring in a baby. Like I said, there's dozens of possibilities they could explore that have already been set in motion before they introduce "Spider-Boy."
2 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag