"There's a script that's being developed," Zemeckis told the site. "We've got the original writers that are working on it now - (Peter) Seaman and (Jeffrey) Price."
Zemeckis also spoke to the number of proposed sequels, prequels and other films that were in various stages of development over the years, but all of which fell through.
"I think there was a time right after the movie came out that the Disney regime at the time - it was a point in the life of the studio where if you made a successful movie they could no longer afford to hire you back," he laughed. "I guess there were some projects that I don't know anything about."
to read the rest of the article.Who Framed Roger Rabbit? was released June 21st, 1988 and stars Bob Hoskins, Christopher Lloyd, Joanna Cassidy, Charles Fleischer, Stubby Kaye, Alan Tilvern, Richard LeParmentier, Lou Hirsch. The film is directed by Robert Zemeckis.
Comments (18)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Chad Vital
Like Independence Day had some good effects, but other parts, look terrible. All the fire explosions look so fake lol. But the whole light beam into the buildings look really good. Kinda weird.
2 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
Brainiac
oh i get wut u meant now, i was saying that if it is used poorly then it no longer is a good effect because the poor usage takes away from it.
2 years agoby @thebdFlag
ed_wood
I'd watch a sequel, the original is great. But I agree, no mocap for this movie.
2 years agoby @ed-woodFlag
Chad Vital
For an example of a movie with good effects used properly, I Robot.
2 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
Chad Vital
The effects themselves were really good. You can make good graphics but use them poorly. I see it alot actually. Since that's what I do as a hobby and I see details in images etc, I just notice that kind of stuff. Especially fonts.
2 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
Brainiac
if he does a mocap sequel to Roger Rabbit i'll be pissed. film it the same way as the original and don't f*ck it up, Roger Rabbit is one of my fav movies, and i don't want Zemeckis to ruin it.
and if the effects didn't blend in well with the real actors and backgrounds then they r bad effects. thats like sayin this sandwich is delicious it just tastes like sh*t.
2 years agoby @thebdFlag
CelluloidDreams
20 years too late!!! Let it go!!!
2 years agoby @2movieguysFlag
Chad Vital
Actually, G.I Joe had great effects, but the problem was that they didn't blend them in well with the real life background and people.
2 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag
ZanyZap
No offense to Mr. Z, but f*ck this noise.
2 years agoby @zanyzapFlag
Null and Void.
God damn it.
2 years agoby @soylentgreenFlag
Cripple
Why God Why?
2 years agoby @crippleFlag
Newkill3000
Who Killed Roger Rabbit?
2 years agoby @newkill200Flag
-comrade-
Please tell me it's 2d with real actors...
Or that they're just not doing this.
2 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
Mmm_mmm
BUT DON'T WE ALREADY KNOW WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT?!?!
WERE'S THE MYSTERY? WHERE'S THE ADVENTURE? WHERE'S CHRISTOPHER LLOYD!?!
2 years agoby @mmm-mmmFlag
IamBATMAN
fantastic!
2 years agoby @iambatmanFlag
Newkill3000
Lol, from that comment Bawn, I doubt you saw GI Joe. Terrible effects.
2 years agoby @newkill200Flag
Bawnian-Dexeus
well...this will be interesting
back then the special effects were good
now they should be better
2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Newkill3000
Oh, please don't f*ck this up.
2 years agoby @newkill200Flag