Unused Hulk Animatronic
Hulk was released June 20th, 2003 and stars Eric Bana, Jennifer Connelly, Sam Elliott, Josh Lucas, Nick Nolte, Paul Kersey, Cara Buono, Todd Tesen. The film is directed by Ang Lee.
Hulk was released June 20th, 2003 and stars Eric Bana, Jennifer Connelly, Sam Elliott, Josh Lucas, Nick Nolte, Paul Kersey, Cara Buono, Todd Tesen. The film is directed by Ang Lee.
Comments (14)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
gandoff2169
As for the clip, I think a combo of this animatronics and CGI would have made for a kooler over all look of the HULK instead a bit, unreal. But CGI would have had to be included to have realistic facial movement and over all moving on its feet.
2 years agoby @gandoff2169Flag
gandoff2169
Lee's Hulk was really good. There was alot of misses on story, such as a history with his father and science with the military. But all in all was good. And dont care who says anything diffrent, despite nothing being said in the Incrediable Hulk with Nortan, it was a sequal to HULK, where the first 15 minutes of the film was a back drop of what ended and happend in HULK. But the movie went forward and changed alot of visual history. But being in south america in hidding, with the same general after him, making refrences to his transforming from the first movie also....
2 years agoby @gandoff2169Flag
RojoDiablo
I enjoyed Lee's Hulk very much, no suffering on my part to sit through his version!
2 years agoby @rojodiabloFlag
Major Tom
It's really amazing, the things we can do with animatronics. I think it's incredible how life like that robot looked. If they had covered it in ballistics gel and painted it green, it would almost look alive, and that's top-of-the-line robotics right there. And yet, we could be using those robotics for medical purposes.... Naaah! Let's make a movie with this stuff!
But seriously, MUCH more desirable then CGI Hulk, at least in Ang Lee's version. I think it would of made Hulk a lot more worth it to suffer through.
And @Drewski, why don't you go read the article again, I think you'll find your Superman stuff.if you don't find it there, look in the above "Related Stories" bar.
2 years agoby @movie-nutFlag
Drewski37
sorry but i didnt see no superman stuff there in the video just hulk stuff
2 years agoby @drewski37Flag
incmob
personally i am a traditionalist... phantom menace cgi was always a downgrade from original trilogy standards (i only use that as an example)... models, makeup and matte paintings just had a more realistic feel to them, much more tangible. IMHO i think the animatronic would have worked to a certain degree, and given it a much more real feel, and that they could have used cgi for where the animatronic could not work (such as in when hulk was jumping through the desert. i think the only thing that has really captured cgi well has been avatar, jurassic park, and gollum in LOTR's, of course that is easily debatable especially with fantastic cgi creations such as jar jar binks :) (sarcasm) But i do agree that hulk was a big disappointment anyhow and i dont think anything could have saved that film.
2 years agoby @incmobFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
The first few seconds looked more like a tribute to Arnold than Hulk
2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Mr. Fixit
It would not have mattered what he chose to use for his movie, Ang Lee's movie sucked from start to finish.
2 years agoby @mrfixitFlag
J.P.
I love MovieWeb's attempts to compete with ComicBookMovie.
Face it. User-Generated content always prevails.
2 years agoby @jptheredskullFlag
ed_wood
It looked really well done and probably would have been the better choice.
2 years agoby @ed-woodFlag
lee337
Jason I said that when the first movie was announced. And then they went back to it in the second film. CGI has come a long way, but not far enough for me. I hope with the technology from Avatar that they are going to use for the Avengers the Hulk has more depth and Ruffalo can give him a REAL personality.
2 years agoby @lee337Flag
CMR-BOI
jason ur so dead on!!
2 years agoby @cmrboiFlag
Ps2fatboy
im glad they didnt go that way ,but in saying that the cgi wasnt that great either the first hulk was slow and rubbish needed to be more action not the thinking mans hero hulk isnt that
2 years agoby @ps2fatboyFlag
JasonKat
i rather see that than CGI, geez those guys put their heart & soul into making these wire by wire and piece by piece just so the director can say "NAHHH" would have looked more real than flat cgi.
2 years agoby @jasonkatFlag