
Harry Shearer speaks out on The Simpsons contract dispute
Today, Harry Shearer spoke out for himself on the matter, revealing that he had not just agreed to a 45% cut in salary, but that he was willing to take more than a 70% cut in exchange for a small percentage of the show's profits. 20th Century Fox will not agree to these terms, and the show is quickly heading for the ax.
Below, you can read Harry Shearer thoughts on this matter.
"For many years now, the cast of The Simpsons has been trying to get Fox to agree that, like so many other people who've contributed significantly to the show's success, we be allowed a tiny share of the billions of dollars in profits the show has earned. Fox has consistently refused to even consider the matter. Instead, it's paid us salaries that, while ridiculous by any normal standard, pale in comparison to what the show's profit participants have been taking home.
Now, as the show enters its twenty-third season, we are engaged in what will probably be our last contract negotiation with Fox. As you may have heard, the network has taken the position that The Simpsons no longer makes enough money and that unless we in the cast accept a 45% pay cut, they are not going to bring the show back for a twenty-fourth season.
Obviously, there are a lot more important things going on in the world right now, in the streets of New York and elsewhere. But given how many people seem to care about what happens to our show - and how much misinformation has been flying around - I thought it might make sense for at least one member of the cast to speak out directly. I should note that I am speaking only for myself, and not for any of the other actors on the show.
Fox wants to cut our salaries in half because it says it can't afford to continue making the show under what it calls the existing business model. Fox hasn't explained what kind of new business model it has formulated to keep the show on the air, but clearly the less money they have to pay us in salary, the more they're able to afford to continue broadcasting the show. And to this I say, fine - if pay cuts are what it will take to keep the show on the air, then cut my pay. In fact, to make it as easy as possible for Fox to keep new episodes of "The Simpsons" coming, I'm willing to let them cut my salary not just 45% but more than 70% - down to half of what they said they would be willing to pay us. All I would ask in return is that I be allowed a small share of the eventual profits.
My representatives broached this idea to Fox yesterday, asking the network how low a salary number I would have to accept to make a profit participation feasible. My representatives were told there was no such number. There were, the Fox people said, simply no circumstances under which the network would consider allowing me or any of the actors to share in the show's success.
As a member of the The Simpsons cast for 23 years, I think it's fair to say that we've had a great run and no one should feel sorry for any of us. But given how much joy the show has given so many people over the years - and given how many billions of dollars in profits News Corp. has earned and will earn from it - I find it hard to believe that this is Fox's final word on the subject. At least I certainly hope it isn't, because the alternative is to cancel the show or fire me for having the gall to try to save the show by helping Fox with its new business model. Neither would be a fair result - either to those of us who have committed so many years to the show or to its loyal fans who make our effort worthwhile."
Now, as the show enters its twenty-third season, we are engaged in what will probably be our last contract negotiation with Fox. As you may have heard, the network has taken the position that The Simpsons no longer makes enough money and that unless we in the cast accept a 45% pay cut, they are not going to bring the show back for a twenty-fourth season.
Obviously, there are a lot more important things going on in the world right now, in the streets of New York and elsewhere. But given how many people seem to care about what happens to our show - and how much misinformation has been flying around - I thought it might make sense for at least one member of the cast to speak out directly. I should note that I am speaking only for myself, and not for any of the other actors on the show.
Fox wants to cut our salaries in half because it says it can't afford to continue making the show under what it calls the existing business model. Fox hasn't explained what kind of new business model it has formulated to keep the show on the air, but clearly the less money they have to pay us in salary, the more they're able to afford to continue broadcasting the show. And to this I say, fine - if pay cuts are what it will take to keep the show on the air, then cut my pay. In fact, to make it as easy as possible for Fox to keep new episodes of "The Simpsons" coming, I'm willing to let them cut my salary not just 45% but more than 70% - down to half of what they said they would be willing to pay us. All I would ask in return is that I be allowed a small share of the eventual profits.
My representatives broached this idea to Fox yesterday, asking the network how low a salary number I would have to accept to make a profit participation feasible. My representatives were told there was no such number. There were, the Fox people said, simply no circumstances under which the network would consider allowing me or any of the actors to share in the show's success.
As a member of the The Simpsons cast for 23 years, I think it's fair to say that we've had a great run and no one should feel sorry for any of us. But given how much joy the show has given so many people over the years - and given how many billions of dollars in profits News Corp. has earned and will earn from it - I find it hard to believe that this is Fox's final word on the subject. At least I certainly hope it isn't, because the alternative is to cancel the show or fire me for having the gall to try to save the show by helping Fox with its new business model. Neither would be a fair result - either to those of us who have committed so many years to the show or to its loyal fans who make our effort worthwhile."
The fate of The Simpsons has not yet been decided, but if 20th Century Fox doesn't budge, this will be the end of television's longest running sitcom in the history of the medium.





Comments (6)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Garret
Fox is just plain 100% greedy, I understand were the voice actors are coming from and I fully support them. But it doesn't matter what the viewers think, only how much more money the fat cats at the top can earn. It's sad that we live in a sickning world like this. Banish money altogether if were ever gonna join together as one and make it a decent planet.
8 months agoby @garretbyrneFlag
slysnide
@shuabert: Except these guys just voice the characters. On occasion they'll help write the stuff, but to be paying voice actors millions upon millions of dollars seems ridiculous when they don't need to use critical thinking or problem solving skills to do what they do for a living. Sure it'd be nice if Fox took a pay cut too to show gratitude, but they do more work than the voice actors do. The animators should be getting pay raises and percentages if anybody gets anything. That's a long and arduous process. The show-running animators at least. Granted the voice actors have leverage, Fox will only hold out for so long.
@justhim-sir: That division of Fox shares its profits in a totally separate group than Fox Television. They share it with the senior board and coordinating divisions of the corporation. Same can be said of the Fox News Channel, Fox Movie Channel, FX, and the basic Fox television station. They don't share their profits with the separate divisions. It's like borrowing money from production budgets to increase station crew salary. It's not gonna happen.
8 months agoby @slysnideFlag
Seanserv0
Fox still sucks
8 months agoby @seanserv0Flag
Josh
This is a basic business principle Shearer is asking Fox for. You get a better product when people have a cut of the company, because they're invested in how good the quality of what they're creating is.
8 months agoby @shuabertFlag
Justhim_sir
Oh I see, Fox is being greedy. They got money hell a billion dollars from Avator unless james had took in over 50% of it, they got money.
8 months agoby @justhim-sirFlag
Seanserv0
Man.... Fox sucks!
8 months agoby @seanserv0Flag