Cliffhanger
The original film was an action-adventure thriller that took place in the mountains. It was originally directed by Renny Harlin in 1993.
The redo will follow a group of young climbers.
"Just as they rebooted Star Trek, we're going to do the same with Cliffhanger, " stated Moritz, who is slated to produce.
Italy was the location in the first film that stood in for the Colorado Rockies. This new film will take place in "multiple cliff-face locations."
Currently, StudioCanal is trying to attach a screenwriter.
StudioCanal is fully financing this new version of Cliffhanger.
Comments (32)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Illuminati
i agree with elicash55, if you know hate them for making crap like this don't PAY for it. Decent attempts like STAR TREK is worth paying full price for. Garbage like this is bootlegged or downloaded. that's what the studios deserve!
3 years agoby @illuminatiFlag
Diaigma
Moritz, just because you cited Star Trek as a comparison, I only have this to say...
"ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR VULCAN MIND!!!" :P
3 years agoby @diaigmaFlag
jayjordan1
i think that hollywood has ran out of ideas of making anything new and have remake all the good movies so lets go a remake cliffhanger okay that makes no sense really the first was okay what do they think they good do with a move like cliffhanger dose it need to be rebot i think not i think this is waste of time and money bring some ideas to table hollywood i think tis prove that hollywood is so lazy when they want to rebot a movie like this come on really
3 years agoby @jayjordan1Flag
Soylent Green:The Devil's Eyes
I'm gonna start tossing bodies soon enough.
3 years agoby @jcisawesomeFlag
elicash55
I hate anyone that says..."why!? aw f*ckin' hollywood is out of ideas....but i'll probably go see it anyways..." F*CK YOU. YOU are the reason they keep making this bullsh*t. Because you talk sh*t and don't back it up. Feed it your money you dumb asses...
(this comment was in no way directed at anyone in particular, but if you felt offended then I was probably talking about you)
3 years agoby @elicash55Flag
m00reman
What the hell!! Yet another classic they want to f*ck up!!
Hollywood needs to grow some new balls
3 years agoby @m00remanFlag
Err
i like that they justify this by citing the star trek reboot,
like thats a fair comparison.
3 years agoby @err2005Flag
DasBoot
bahaha when will they stop!
3 years agoby @dasbootFlag
Diaigma
I can understand a Star Trek remake, but a Cliffhanger remake? Come on! Like it's going to have the same kind of following that Star Trek has. :P
3 years agoby @diaigmaFlag
Newkill3000
This sounds like some direct to dvd sh*t.
3 years agoby @newkill200Flag
Mutant
hell no, leave it alone.
3 years agoby @zenderFlag
Chiro-man3
Wow...Hollywood can't think of something better to do. What a waste of time and money!
3 years agoby @durso3Flag
Juggernaut_Paunch
whats the next film to be remade? uhmmmmm, daylight?
3 years agoby @juggernaut-paunchFlag
HAPPYJACK
SPOT ON HADERACH. HOLLYWOOD IS DESPRITE FOR NEW IDEAS. JUST A BUNCH OF SUITS SITTING IN AN OFFICE TRYING TO MAKE A QUICK DOLLAR.
3 years agoby @happyjackFlag
nathan_lease
WTF! Another reboot. Give me a break already.
3 years agoby @nathan-leaseFlag
choro2326
Why in the hell they want to make a reboot? come on now, they can come out with something different. What a bunch of idiots!!!! This is a good movie and they should leave it alone.
3 years agoby @choro2326Flag
Messenger
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
3 years agoby @messengerFlag
Dizman19
why a reboot it was never intended for a sequel
3 years agoby @dizman19Flag
The Kwisatz Haderach
wow few ideas remain hollywood it seems
3 years agoby @the-kwisatz-haderachFlag
ed_wood
The original is great and its not in need of a reboot. I guess they are going to remake everything.
3 years agoby @ed-woodFlag
psychobilly13
whats next a lords of flattbush remake or stop or my mom will shot. Damn Hollywood you've gone to ffaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr/ arseholes
3 years agoby @psychobilly13Flag
Shelley
I would have never thought of this movie to 'reboot' but I did not realize it had made over $255 million. The picture they used here is some cover art from the original film so it does not necessarily mean Sly will be in the film.
3 years agoby @shelleyFlag
wade_wilson
I know hollywood is going reboot crazy, but cliffhanger? seriously? You can never top a classic, rarely anyways. They should just call it something else and not just say they are rebooting the movie, cause I am betting all they will be using is the names and thats ir
3 years agoby @wade-wilsonFlag
seymourstrange
i really dont agree with illegal downloading, but i might do it to this when its out just to show what a dumb idead it is, the original was good but with differant actors an probably a differant story you might as well call it something else instead of branding it a cliff hanger film so it sells a bit more.
All the 80s action films are getting destroyed, whats next running man, commando, double impact, rocky????
3 years agoby @seymourstrangeFlag
Illuminati
theBD, you're not funny. Psychobilly, you are :)
Just like STAR TREK,...The reporters who interview should have some balls to point out the obvious!
CLIFFHANGER reboot, great so not long before we see OVER THE TOP, TANGO & CASH remakes, yahhhh!
3 years agoby @illuminatiFlag
-comrade-
Why, I don't get all these f*cking reboots...
3 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag
Brainiac
ok, for starters u must have huge nuts psychobilly in order for this movie to be able to cliffhang from them, prolly too big if u ask me. moving on, this isn't the poster for the REMAKE, this is just a picture representing the original. thirdly, WHY?!?! I agree with I Am That Guy, hollywood or w/e powers that be have completely ran out of all ideas.
lastly, i think the Star Trek comparison means they r goin to some how have Sly go back in time and cuz him not to drop the person in the opening scene, therefore rewriting the history of THE CLIFFHANGER!!!! DUN DUN DUN!!!! dumb idea
3 years agoby @thebdFlag
psychobilly13
this remake can cliffhang on my motherf*cken nutts
3 years agoby @psychobilly13Flag
brew1701
My God, why? This is a completely useless remake, what are u rebooting?This isn't a franchise, the original was a great action movie. Soo stupid to compare it to Star Trek
3 years agoby @brew1701Flag
Mushy
Is sly in the remake?
According to that poster he is.
3 years agoby @mushyFlag