Comic-Con 2014

SDCC 2009: EXCLUSIVE: No 'Ghostbusters 3' for Sigourney Weaver

The actress reveals that she has no interest in re-visiting the franchise.
During our interview with actress Sigourney Weaver for James Cameron's Avatar, we got the the chance to ask her if she had any interest in returning to the Ghostbusters franchise with the upcoming sequel, Ghostbusters 3 set to hit theaters in 2010.

"All I said was, look guys, if there is a Ghostbusting part for Dana's son Oscar, that's who I would like...

That's what you want, you don't want to be in it yourself?

That's alright, no...leave it to them."


Ghostbusters comes to theaters in 2016.


Share this story yet?

0 0 0 0 0

RELATED STORIES

BEST OF THE WEB

Comments (17)

  1. Raoul Duke

    Bummer. Hopefully they can get Moranis.

    5 years agoby @raoulduke33Flag

  2. Newkill3000

    They should just f*ck this new installment and let the new video game be the end.

    5 years agoby @newkill200Flag

  3. PypeBomb

    AVATAR WEBSITE IS UP!

    Here's the f*cking link: http://www.avatarmovie.com/

    If movieweb had its sh*t together, they would have already posted this.

    5 years agoby @pypebombFlag

  4. CelluloidDreams

    Damn!!! Sigourney Weaver is smart!!! 3 is not always magic!!!

    5 years agoby @2movieguysFlag

  5. Diaigma

    I figured as such :P

    5 years agoby @diaigmaFlag

  6. LEO: Lord Epsilon Omega

    Oh well. It would've been cool if she was in it, but her choice. :-/ This movie's still gonna rock!

    5 years agoby @epsalonFlag

  7. Lock and Stock

    This is a f*ck up, this movie is starting to loose cast members.

    5 years agoby @m-man360Flag

  8. Rufio

    i bet she cameos... good happy medium. her character was annoying in both films so i'm glad she's not returning; however, it would be nice to at least have a cameo of her so they don't just write her out.

    5 years agoby @rufioFlag

  9. ikilledbill2wice

    i actually dont think she'll "take what she can get" nor do i think shes a bitch like wolfbiker but i mean cmon. shes at an age where she doesnt want to do something that she probably felt should have died at part 2. almost all the cast from part one who did part two, agreed it was terrible experience. so why go back to it?

    plus at that age, you probably want to enjoy whatever money who have earned from hollywood. she doesnt need to be like one of these young actresses who HAS to do everything just to make a name for themselves.

    5 years agoby @ikilledbill2wiceFlag

  10. isa98

    Like she has a choice, she hasn't been getting much lately. She should take what she can get.

    5 years agoby @isa98Flag

  11. RavenX5 God of Light

    cause she had very painful work on James Cameron Avatar movie and thats why she will no longer be on Ghostbusters 3

    5 years agoby @hackx9Flag

  12. drexll

    spoil sport.

    5 years agoby @drexllFlag

  13. Yahzee

    Don't call her names you wolfbiker904 moron, Sigourney surely has a good reason, and just, who the hell you think you are to think that she MUST be in another one? I would love to see her again, but that's totally up to her

    5 years agoby @yahzeeFlag

  14. Messenger

    Not to be a dick but what does she have going on to where she couldnt do it?

    5 years agoby @messengerFlag

  15. ed_wood

    Oh well.

    5 years agoby @ed-woodFlag

  16. Tronticon

    to bad.. would have been cool if she were in it! but it's still early!!!!!

    5 years agoby @tronticonFlag

  17. wolfbiker904

    f*ckin bitch

    5 years agoby @wolfbiker904Flag