Red Dawn Trailer
Red Dawn was released November 21st, 2012 and stars Chris Hemsworth, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Adrianne Palicki, Josh Hutcherson, Isabel Lucas, Josh Peck, Brett Cullen, Matt Gerald. The film is directed by Dan Bradley.
Red Dawn Trailer
Sources: Yahoo! Movies
Do you like this story?
RELATED STORIES
-
CONTEST: Win Red Dawn on Blu-ray
-
Red Dawn Blu-ray and DVD Debut March 5th
-
Red Dawn Lady Wolverines Featurette with Adrianne Palicki and Isabel Lucas
-
Two Red Dawn Clips Pay Homage to the 1984 Original
-
First Red Dawn Clip!
BEST OF THE WEB
Comments (77)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
Well I know I'm not seeing that
9 months agoby @cryptFlag
THE JOKER
@jasdjqs No problem... figured you might like to know haha...
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
jasdjqs
OMG sorry thanks for the scoop @mcleve02
9 months agoby @jasdjqsFlag
THE JOKER
@jasdjqs I am counting the minutes... haha
BTW you know to properly tag someone you have to go over their comment and at the bottom right hand corner is their tag... just click it.. it will show up... my actually tag is not THE JOKER, it is mcleve02
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
jasdjqs
@the joker, the Twlight movies are over at years end, so dont worry it is almost over, lol
9 months agoby @jasdjqsFlag
THE JOKER
@jasdjqs I would love to think I am willing to see any movie... I just know I don't like where this is going... but hey at least it is not Twilight!
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
THE JOKER
@XxNickTheFilmCriticXx Yeah, I am bound to catch one soon!
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
Nicholaus XX
@mcleve02 -- Maybe, maybe not.
9 months agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag
THE JOKER
@the-movieghost I see that haha... I always come in just after these things....
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
the MovieGhost
@mcleve02 Well @bryanyentz took care of that pretty well ;P
9 months agoby @the-movieghostFlag
jasdjqs
@the JOKER Well put. I also hate when CGI looks crappy in a movie. I will give this movie a shot,
9 months agoby @jasdjqsFlag
THE JOKER
@jasdjqs The problem is that when you have other movies that pull of the CGI and make it look extremely real, the expectation is that all the films should fill that quota... When it doesn't that's when people will tear it to shreds
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
jasdjqs
Seems ok, have to see it to see if it is as good as the orig, I love when people talk about making a product made with cgi and fake guns and cameras look believable, Its a movie people!!! see it if you want but base on the long thread on this trailer post allot fo you are going to see it, lol
9 months agoby @jasdjqsFlag
THE JOKER
@Ryan-Davis Sorry bro, your going to have to get a pack if you hope to survive on this site... especially when your opinions are out there and you are the one who starts being vulgar...
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
THE JOKER
@ejk1@XxNickTheFilmCriticXx@the-movieghost@bryanyentz@dan1 What did I miss, are we breaking in a newbie?
9 months agoby @mcleve02Flag
TheDude1
@renodc You hit the nail right on the head. The studio changed the attackers from the Chinese to the North Koreans because AMC theaters was bought by a Chinese company. This will continue to happen in the future as well.
9 months agoby @thedude1Flag
Mutant
looks excellent to me, killer Joe looks interesting.
9 months agoby @zenderFlag
renodc
From a financial standpoint even though China would be the most likely fit for the invading force, it would have been completely stupid to put them in the role of villain especially with China becoming more open to American cinema. They are a huge potential market.
As screwed up as Hollywood's thinking is, I'm suprised they didn't have the movie take place overseas with the US invading France or something and call the movie Red, White and Blue Dawn.
9 months agoby @renodcFlag
renodc
From the trailer, it looks like they stayed very close to the original concept minus the Russians add in the North Koreans(?). I didn't mind that the first film was from a reality standpoint completely preposterous, but I was kind of hoping they might put a little effort into the remake to try and tweak the story to make it a little more believable. This doesn't seem to be the case, and the North Korean invasion concept makes it even less believable.
9 months agoby @renodcFlag
ejk1
I go away for a couple of days, and I find some newbie acting like tough sh*t, only to smacked down. Kudos, @bryanyentz
Oh, and @dowhatwedo read @thedude1which should be just below mine. You'll get a fairly good idea of why people are laughing at this film.
9 months agoby @ejk1Flag
TheDude1
I still can't get past the fact that the studio caved into pressure and changed the the invaders to the North Koreans instead of the Chinese(even the Russians would have been a good choice). Damn you Hollywood!!!
9 months agoby @thedude1Flag
Nicholaus XX
@bawnian-dexeus -- Say again?
9 months agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
@XxNickTheFilmCriticXx Assuming they don't take it seriously.
9 months agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Nicholaus XX
@2movieguys -- The majority of audiences/consumers eat up a lot of sh*t. A lot of great/outstanding movies have laughable plots(if you really think about it), but have an incredible execution. This not being the case, of course. Based on the popularity of Jersey Shore, the Kardashians, Twilight, and Transformers(not to mention practically everything on CW; there's a very high chance people will buy into this, also.
9 months agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag
the MovieGhost
@bryanyentz Aaaand BLAM!
9 months agoby @the-movieghostFlag
CelluloidDreams
...To clarify my comment ....we laughed at the orginial film and the concept of an invasion of Russia...So how can anyone buy that the USA (or half of it!) would be taken over during an an invasion from No. Korea!?!?......and we (the moive audience) will laugh now...I was making a "Comparison "....on how U can change the setting...change the plot...etc;..but somehow people will still laugh and jeer.!
9 months agoby @2movieguysFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
@bryanyentz *bravo*
9 months agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Bryan Yentz
@Ryan-Davis
And yet you go onto other pages and talk about how lame you think other films are; i.e.: The Dark Tower page in which you stated, "Ron Howard? Come on. . . I'm sure this will disappoint" and "Great. . . Terrible writer at the helm. Can't wait." So you do the EXACT thing you stated that you didn't do.
Congratulations, you f*cking rash, hypocrite.
But considering you apparently don't read things fully but instead jump to conclusions, I'll go ahead and summarize this as a list.
1. You go onto pages and complain about film's and their overall value.
2. You attacked me for stating my side on the subject of Red Dawn's trailer.
3. You say that you're not guilty of doing the same thing.
4. You do the EXACT SAME THING.
5. Examples listed above--or refer to your own page for a record of your bitching.
6. You are a hypocrite.
7. You seem to be blind to your own actions and lack of logic. And troll upon others for doing the same thing you do; even when you agree that the material looks lame.
8. Really, man?
I hope my numbered points made it easier for you to comprehend this time around. And next time you think about harping on someone, you had damn well better make sure you're not doing the same thing you attack others for.
9 months agoby @bryanyentzFlag
Dan
@XxNickTheFilmCriticXx Eh.
9 months agoby @dan1Flag
Nicholaus XX
@dan1 -- "Umad" = the most annoying online term in the history of texts.
@2movieguys -- The first one wasn't any good in the first place, so don't get your panties in a bunch.
@bryanyentz -- Agreed.
@Ryan-Davis -- Your avatar perfectly emulates your personality. It was nice to see that you "gave a f*ck", and insulted Bryan(for no apparent reason), only to say that you think the movie looks lame. Am I missing something, or did you just contradict yourself?
9 months agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag