Paranormal Activity 4 was released October 19th, 2012 and stars Katie Featherston, Kathryn Newton, Matt Shively, Brady Allen, Alisha Boe, Tommy Miranda. The film is directed by Henry Joost, Ariel Schulman.
Paranormal Activity 4 'Audience Reaction' TV Spot
Sources: Paramount Pictures
Do you like this story?
RELATED STORIES
-
EXCLUSIVE: Katie Featherston Talks Paranormal Activity 4
-
EXCLUSIVE: Matt Shively Talks Paranormal Activity 4 Blu-ray
-
EXCLUSIVE: Matt Shively and Kathryn Newton Talk Paranormal Activity 4 Ending and Paranormal Activity 5!
-
BOX OFFICE PREDICTIONS: Will Paranormal Activity 4 Repeat for a Second Week at the Box Office?
-
BOX OFFICE BEAT DOWN: Paranormal Activity 4 Wins with $30.2 Million
BEST OF THE WEB
Comments (40)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Vanboy
That black girl at 0:20 was hillarious! She asked very earnestly, like her boyfriend has the answer; "What was that, what was that?! XD
7 months agoby @vanboyFlag
Nicholaus XX
@corey -- I don't know about that. A lot of people are easy to please/scare, so it's hard to say, at this point. I remember watching "The Green Hornet" in theatres, and people laughed at just about every comical scene. And the movie wasn't even funny.
7 months agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise true. a sequel, especially releasing it now, or a year or so from now may not be the best idea, financially
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@crypt I think the movie did so well beacuse they really kept it under wraps and audiences were intruiged with the what they saw in the preview. i think people were more intruiged with what it was actually all about.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
But that'd be sweet if it was a legit sequel, taking place after the first
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise I think its cool, but also stupid that it is the same event, but from a different person recording it. We will see. I know I must re-watch the first again. I remember I liked it, just did not see the rave, ya know?
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@crypt I have heard the rumors that a Cloverfield sequel is in the works. There is a moment on the bridge where the PPOV charcter films another guy wth a camera who is filming him. It would be interesting to see the same story from another perspective. But i get the feeling they want to expain some things frmo the original.
By the end of the first movie the monster is still on a rampage so perhaps we could see from the militarys POV. Abrams and crew have said that they would not do another unless they had a great script..crossing my fingers on tha tone.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise this is true; i own the DVD. perhaps i should re-watch it. what i think is dumb is that theyre doing a sequel.
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@crypt the one thing I will say about Cloverfield is that it took the POV to new heights as far as FX anyway.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise ah, it did not do that for me at all; guess i have a strong stomach! haha
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@crypt I thought the Cloverfield concept was very cool and it had some very cool moments but again, the camera work mae me a little dizzy. @bawnian-dexeus
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise yeah I understand. I think the studios are overdoing it for sure. beating dead hoarse. but oh well, i will try to enjoy it while it lasts! but i did not care for Cloverfield much
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
@skywise At least with Cloverfield you saw "more" than other movies
7 months agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
skywise
@bawnian-dexeus right, it looks so clean but when it comes to POV's that is what i need.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
skywise
@crypt I can unerstand why it is appealing to some and I have enjoyed certain POV movies, like Chronical. That was a POV that was done very well. Setting up the characters a experienced camera operators and later the fact that he can move the camera with his mind make for a smooth viewing experience. IMO this is how POV should look. the ultra shake that is so prevailant in these types of movies (while somewhat realistic) tends to turn me off. Cloverfield and even VHS (which I enjoyed made me a little dizzy in some parts.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
@skywise Especially with a webcam with impossible quality
7 months agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise I agree, they are made cheaply, but I think the POV adds to the effect. Especially when the camera is off the tripod, and in a character's hand.
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@bawnian-dexeus It makes sense that a the series goes on they are learning what works and what doesnt. And as uninterested as I am for part 4, I would have to say that it looks the best (as far as cinematogrophy goes).
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
@skywise They were don't for cheep, but man did part 3 looks top notch
7 months agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
skywise
@crypt when it comes to these movies I am definatly biased as I said what with the POV handheld. I think the films could have been much more intruiging if they were set up as non POV movies. The POV aspect feels very cheap and indeed the movies were made very cheaply. I think that is why the studios love these because they are cheap to make but rake in major $$$.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise Really? part 2 is my least. I still like it, of course. But it tells the least story, and is the least creepy, and honestly I dont even remember much, even though i watched them all the same day, a month or 2 ago. its weird.
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@crypt I found the first to be rather boring but I will say that for what iut was it was originaly. On the other hand I enjoyed the second one much more than the first and 3rd.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise yeah, I mean I'm not trying to make an argument, but I just greatly enjoy the story. See, the first was great because you did not know what it was. When they revealed it was a demon, mentioning childhood, and plus leaving with a cliffhnager like that, they set themselves up for sequels and prequels. yes, part 2 was honestly pretty pointless, but the ending was great, and part 3 was great because it showed what we already partially knew.
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
skywise
@crypt The plots were not very good IMO but the creepy ghost scares were decent. I just never really cared about the characters and the POV/found footage takes away from the story.
I know these movies are very popular and I have seen them all so far but I cant recall the story. I love ghost house movies as you know but I am a little biased with the execution.
I am not trying to be argumentative and when it comes to horror your pretty much my go to guy for those conversations.
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
@skywise I'm not sure what your prior conversation is, but actually these movies have pretty interesting stories to them, in my opinion
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
Corey W.
@XxNickTheFilmCriticXx They are paid actors.
7 months agoby @coreyFlag
The Cryptkeeper: Resurrected
Hahahaha, going back to the original PA trailer style I see.
7 months agoby @cryptFlag
Nicholaus XX
What a bunch of pussies. Screaming and cringing over jump-out scenes.
7 months agoby @XxNickTheFilmCriticXxFlag
skywise
@2movieguys wait...these have plots??
7 months agoby @skywiseFlag
CelluloidDreams
...How much was the audience paid!?. In these economic hard times anybody could be paid to see "Paranormal Activity"!.
7 months agoby @2movieguysFlag