Fox's Tom Rothman Talks Daredevil Reboot

Our friends over at IESB recently cornered 20th Century Fox co-chairman Tom Rothman and quizzed him about a potential Daredevil reboot. This is what the man had to say for himself:
"A Daredevil, to use your words, reboot, is something we are thinking very seriously about. The thing The Incredible Hulk showed although, it did what it did, is that it is possible, that if you really do it right the audience will give you a second chance. That it is possible. And I think that you see that when they did Batman Begins, the first Nolan movie, that you can have made some mistakes along the way or movies that the audience wasn't that crazy about and then given the proper amount of time and the right creative vision behind it, you can, to use your word, reboot. Would it be as dark? I don't know because what it really needs is, it needs a visionary at the level that Chris Nolan was. It needs someone, it needs a director, honestly, who has a genuine vision. What we wouldn't do is just do it for the sake of doing it. Right? What we try to do is to get a creative engine for it, that really had a great vision for it, that's what we would look for."


To read more of IESB's interview with Tom Rothman, Click Here!.

Daredevil was released February 14th, 2003 and stars Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner, Colin Farrell, Michael Clarke Duncan, Jon Favreau, Scott Terra, Ellen Pompeo, Joe Pantoliano. The film is directed by Mark Steven Johnson.


Sources: IESB

Do you like this story?


RELATED STORIES

Comments (29)

  1. Radimus-83

    there is no doubt they can make a great DD movie. i liked alot of the Affleck movie. Clark playing the Kingpin was a great idea. the suit was good and of course the best was Colin Farrell playing Bullseye.

    i know what you're getting at Diaigma, and you're right. DD doesn't seem to have the same pull as the other more famous characters. but if you make a great movie like Alien, Predator, Star Wars etc. then people will want to see more, right? you don't have to know what you're watching to enjoy it. just because it isn't a well known franchise doesn't mean anything. if they make the movie "totally super awesome"... then people will watch it and want a sequel.

    4 years agoby @radimus-83Flag

  2. Diaigma

    Except for Punisher, Jokers. He's way dark.

    And I can't see DD having the "Nolan" treatment. It's a fun comic character and all, but there's nothing that screams "franchise" about it, not on the level of Batman, Spider-man, or Iron Man, I mean. I would be surprised if they can pull it off.

    4 years agoby @diaigmaFlag

  3. The Doctor

    I WOULDN'T ACTUALLY MIND A REBOOT. THE FIRST WAS OK, BUT IT COULD OF BEEN WAY BETTER.

    4 years agoby @ghettokidFlag

  4. Jokers_Wild_X

    The thing is that the idea of comic books is that they are not meant to be realistic! I mean when was the last time you saw a guy dressed in bat-armor kicking a clowns ass? Okay other than that time last halloween when I pissed off that bat-man but that doesn't count! (crappy joke i know)
    But really now, a darker tone? isn't that what sh*tted up the last DD movie? I mean it works fine for Batman because you wanna know why? Batman has always had a dark tone, but DD not so much, he was always this bright red demon-costumed blind dude that kicked ass but it wasn't that dark because marvel comics aren't dark, they are mostly bright, they contrast everything to make it seem fun and exciting for the reader.
    DC on the other hand has always been dark and can pull it off with many of its movies,
    but the realistic tone can get annoying with other movies if not pulled off right.
    My belief is that Marvel should keep its whole bright and wonderous style that has spawned some pretty good films (Spider-man 1, Iron Man, Incredible Hulk, Punisher) And though some did fail (F4, THE hulk, SM3, DD) there is still potential if they stay away from the Dark Side (Yes I know crappy Star Wars refference)

    4 years agoby @jokers-wild-xFlag

  5. Alan_Smithy

    If Mr. Rothman is seroius about a reboot and he wants a visionary director along the same lines as Nolan. For me personally David Fincher and to play the man without fear Brad Pitt.
    When I use to read the Marvel Knights Daredevil's. I could see Brad Pitt playing both alter ego's. Murdock is a ladies man despite his disability. Pitt would be perfect on all levels.
    Style wise I would like it to be a combination of Sin City, Kill Bill and of course a similar adult tone that the last two Batman films have.
    Maybe I'll have those wishes granted. Then again maybe not.
    Anyway that's my two cents.

    4 years agoby @alan-smithyFlag

  6. MovieCritique00

    Most Marvel movies these days I think should have an more of a Darker tone to the movie. It makes it more realistic, like BB, and TDK. I will only go to Marvel movie with alot of realistic violence like the Punisher. I'd go for DareDevil, if it was more like the TDK, and had a more darker tone. The superheroes that don't have any kind of power, but their own streangh, the best, like the Punisher, Batman, and I think DareDevil. I mean Daredevil doesn't have any powers does he.

    4 years agoby @moviecritique00Flag

  7. The Narrator: The Better Man

    Because he's gonna be in the Avengers movie, and they said so.

    4 years agoby @narratorFlag

  8. Psycho

    Antman? How do you know they are even making a movie of it?

    4 years agoby @physco-123Flag

  9. The Narrator: The Better Man

    I agree. I mean every hero is different, because they have different attitudes, habits, and feels. Not all are dark, nor are all good. They are all different. Which is why Spiderman 2 and TDK were so good. Hope they find the right note for this, and yes, please get a passionate director.
    Also, can't wait for Doctor Strange, and Antman, and Cap America.

    4 years agoby @narratorFlag

  10. Psycho

    This movie would really need a reboot and also the costume. The first was ok but they should make it better.

    4 years agoby @physco-123Flag

  11. ShadowfoxSC

    I liked the 1st daredevil it was kool A reboot would be ok I guess I also like ghostrider but a reboot for that would be good too

    4 years agoby @shadowscFlag

  12. -comrade-

    It does seem odd that in light of TDK, "Dark" has somehow become synonymous with "good" when it comes to comics movies. Not so. Like I said for Magneto, you look at the characters in their best comics stories, you take what works about it, and you adapt it with your own spin. It just happens that Daredevil is best as a dark character. Spider-Man can have a different kind of darkness, but it's certainly not as deep as other characters. And a lot of characters, like Superman, are never dark, but they are poignant.

    4 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag

  13. Psycho

    They really do need a reboot.

    4 years agoby @physco-123Flag

  14. Marcusx

    Comrade, that brought a tear to my eye. that was brilliantly stated and if i could give you an award, i f*cking would right now. ghostrider was/is EPIC FAIL. fantastically put and extremely well stated. i applaud you and encourage you to keep it going. bravo sir, bravo

    4 years agoby @marcusxFlag

  15. Raoul Duke

    sweet

    4 years agoby @raoulduke33Flag

  16. Shinjiikari1984

    I didn't have a problem with the first version of Daredevil, I guess this is the latest thing in Hollywood. Maybe it was to light but it wasn't bad.

    4 years agoby @shinjiikari1984Flag

  17. SWAK1774

    I liked Daredevil, too. But if they want to reboot it I'll watch it. I just hope they leave a romantic interest out of it. For me, that always seems to ruin these type of movies.

    4 years agoby @swak1774Flag

  18. FlipSide

    I am probably one of the people also that liked the original Daredevil. Yeah it did lack a great story, and the acting could of been a whole lot better, but then again when I did watch it I was roughly 14 years old. A reboot I think would be awesome. And it is pretty funny that most directors now-a-days are looking at Christopher Nolan's Batman franchise for good movie making.

    4 years agoby @soccarplayaFlag

  19. The Anarchist

    REBOOT! REBOOT!

    4 years agoby @dr-manhattanFlag

  20. -comrade-

    MovieCritique, I'd say that given the overt sh*ttiness of X3, a reboot, using a different approach, is more than acceptable, however it doesn't seem likely as there are Wolverine and Magneto films goming out as part of that canon. Who knows, maybe in twenty years someone will pull a Superman Returns and make an adequate third movie in the trilogy that effectively ends that particualr series of X-Men films on a good note.
    I liked Daredevil when I first saw it, of course I was 13, as I grew older and watched it again and again, I became more aware of it's sh*t-factor, and I now see that it was one of the poorest choices made by Marvel. Daredevil is only great (excluding Kirby/Lee's originals obviously) when Frank Miller writes him. If you can get someone to stay close to that feel and mythos, and that version of Elektra (or maybe no Elektra at all in a reboot) then you'd have something worth watching.

    However, like Space101 said, this reboot detracts from accelerating the production of films like Dr. Strange and Ant Man, which are on the outside edges of Marvel's field of interest (though still moving into it, albeit slowly).

    But the main thing is, when a franchise fails, you shouldn't continue it. Spider-Man didn't fail in my opinion, it just hit a low point. X3 failed. Daredevil failed. Ghost Rider FAILED. (3pic fail) Punisher was not a bad film, I don't know why they're rebooting it, but whatever. But we as fan's are presented with the gift of the studio trying again to do it right. That's the great thing about Marvel, is that they're willing to try things again, differently, in order to get them right, which is pretty much unheard of in the history of film. Most people are content to let their sh*tty movies sit there and soil the name of the characters they are based on (Superman iii and iv, the first two Harry Potter films).

    I say the more Marvel tries, the closer they'll get to a version that the majority of True Believers can be happy with.

    4 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag

  21. Zynthos

    Vis your not alone I liked Daredevil too. I think they could do a sequel and up the writing a bit, using different writers.

    4 years agoby @heir-of-isildur0Flag

  22. ed_wood

    I liked Daredevil, but a reboot is good too.

    4 years agoby @ed-woodFlag

  23. Space101

    This wouldn't be a bad idea though they could work on other projects instead of rebooting this one...

    4 years agoby @space101Flag

  24. Chad Vital

    Batman and Superman were DC heros, moviecritique00.

    4 years agoby @chad-vitalFlag

  25. MovieCritique00

    I don't get it, why does Marvel, and any other superhero movie always doing reboots. The punisher was rebooted 2 times. There the fantasic Four movie, it was rebooted from the 80s version. The Incredible Hulk, was a reboot from the Hulk. And Batman and Superman were all rebooted. Now Daredevil, and there's still a debate whether Ghost Rider should be an Sequel or a Reboot. (Reboot I hope). I don't get why they do that, Rebooting every Marvel Movie, whats next the X-Men movies.

    4 years agoby @moviecritique00Flag

  26. T.Clark

    I'm one of the few who liked daredevil, but if they wanna reboot it, then i'm game

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  27. knobie09

    all fox needs to fix now is all that fantastic 4 mishap. make it not dark,but serious. and also(and finally)introduce the main villains like puppet master,the skrulls,or a battle in microverse.

    4 years agoby @knobie09Flag

  28. -comrade-

    Good, I don't want them doing it unless they'll do it right this time.

    4 years agoby @taberjohnson18Flag

(More)Recent Activity