BOX OFFICE BEAT DOWN: 'Immortals' Wins the Weekend with $32 Million

'Jack and Jill' takes second place with $26 million and 'J. Edgar' debuts in fifth place with $11.4 million.

WEEKEND BOX OFFICE:







Sources: Box Office Mojo

Do you like this story?


RELATED STORIES

BEST OF THE WEB

Comments (18)

  1. Corey W.

    Well the last 20 minutes was ok, but not enough for me to really like the film.

    2 years agoby @coreyFlag

  2. Corey W.

    Just saw Immortals. I didn't like it at all.

    2 years agoby @coreyFlag

  3. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    In a matter of days, Immortals will break even and begin making profits

    2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  4. Fat_Jesus

    Tower Heist got significantly better reviews than J. Edgar?

    Oh, good Lord.

    2 years agoby @fat-jesusFlag

  5. m2

    Well at least that piece of s*** Jack & Jill didn't make #1. And as for J. Edgar I was a bit let down, overall it was just a decent film which for me I'll forget about it once award season comes around and unfortunately that includes Leo's performance that was great but not great great. Sorry.

    2 years agoby @m2Flag

  6. CelluloidDreams

    "Immortals" was ok ...I would give it a C+!!! Not much of a plot...tedious towards the end!

    2 years agoby @2movieguysFlag

  7. Replicant

    @ChiRep-1 Definitely. Even so, they can bash the film if they want, but DiCaprio's performance is still an Oscar contender.

    2 years agoby @felipe-11Flag

  8. SupernaturalFreak

    I can't believe J. Edgar only debuted in fifth. I went to see it and it was a great movie. Maybe there wasn't alot of action in it but it didn't need it. It was telling an intriguing story. Leo's performance was great but I also think that Armie Hammer as Clyde Tolson was amazing as well - not to mention kinda sweet. I really liked the slight love story between J. Edgar and Clyde. It was very interesting. I think Leo should get an Oscar for his performance - and I think Armie Hammer should get an Oscar or at least a nomination for his performance. Don't listen to those cynical reviewer hacks!!! J. Edgar deserves to be seen!!!

    2 years agoby @supernaturalfreakFlag

  9. ROFLitschristian

    Jack and Jill made $26 mil? Bummer...

    2 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  10. ChiRep_1

    @thedude-abides Agreed, it fell to the subject of "critical hype" meaning critics assumed this was a best picture contender and DiCaprio's performance as Oscar worthy.

    2 years agoby @ChiRep-1Flag

  11. The First Avenger: JohnnyBlaze

    Im officialy done with Society, The fact that Jack and Jill made any kind of money proves that consumers litteraly have NO BRAINS. F&%# you Sandler! and Your God forsaken hold on mindless idiots!

    2 years agoby @johnnyblazetb82Flag

  12. Replicant

    Really, society? Jack & Jill at #2?
    I can understand Immortals, Puss in Boots, Tower Heist, but Jack & Jill? You've really disappointed me this time.

    2 years agoby @felipe-11Flag

  13. thedude-abides

    Visually pleasing with little to no substance whatsoever? I could'a guessed this would be #1.

    And J. Edgar's 41% I find to be the victim of a hoity toity reviewer base with preconceived expectations of excellence solely because of DiCaprio's performance. 41% is ridiculous. There's no way it's that bad.

    2 years agoby @thedude-abidesFlag

  14. ejk1

    3% just makes me laugh.

    2 years agoby @ejk1Flag

  15. Ghostman

    Well, we didn't see that coming...hopefully this gives Henry Cavill more star power in anticipating Man of Steel :)

    2 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  16. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    Least the wrong movie didn't make it number 1

    2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  17. Corey W.

    Cool. Didn't see either number 1 or 2 this weekend...yet. Seeing Immortals tonight and hoping Jack and Jill pops up online sometime this week.

    2 years agoby @coreyFlag

  18. Josh

    Is Paranormal Activity 3 the most profitable film of all time? It has to be up there.

    2 years agoby @shuabertFlag