Well at least that piece of s*** Jack & Jill didn't make #1. And as for J. Edgar I was a bit let down, overall it was just a decent film which for me I'll forget about it once award season comes around and unfortunately that includes Leo's performance that was great but not great great. Sorry.
I can't believe J. Edgar only debuted in fifth. I went to see it and it was a great movie. Maybe there wasn't alot of action in it but it didn't need it. It was telling an intriguing story. Leo's performance was great but I also think that Armie Hammer as Clyde Tolson was amazing as well - not to mention kinda sweet. I really liked the slight love story between J. Edgar and Clyde. It was very interesting. I think Leo should get an Oscar for his performance - and I think Armie Hammer should get an Oscar or at least a nomination for his performance. Don't listen to those cynical reviewer hacks!!! J. Edgar deserves to be seen!!!
@thedude-abides Agreed, it fell to the subject of "critical hype" meaning critics assumed this was a best picture contender and DiCaprio's performance as Oscar worthy.
Im officialy done with Society, The fact that Jack and Jill made any kind of money proves that consumers litteraly have NO BRAINS. F&%# you Sandler! and Your God forsaken hold on mindless idiots!
Visually pleasing with little to no substance whatsoever? I could'a guessed this would be #1.
And J. Edgar's 41% I find to be the victim of a hoity toity reviewer base with preconceived expectations of excellence solely because of DiCaprio's performance. 41% is ridiculous. There's no way it's that bad.
Comments (18)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Corey W.
Well the last 20 minutes was ok, but not enough for me to really like the film.
2 years agoby @coreyFlag
Corey W.
Just saw Immortals. I didn't like it at all.
2 years agoby @coreyFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
In a matter of days, Immortals will break even and begin making profits
2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Fat_Jesus
Tower Heist got significantly better reviews than J. Edgar?
Oh, good Lord.
2 years agoby @fat-jesusFlag
m2
Well at least that piece of s*** Jack & Jill didn't make #1. And as for J. Edgar I was a bit let down, overall it was just a decent film which for me I'll forget about it once award season comes around and unfortunately that includes Leo's performance that was great but not great great. Sorry.
2 years agoby @m2Flag
CelluloidDreams
"Immortals" was ok ...I would give it a C+!!! Not much of a plot...tedious towards the end!
2 years agoby @2movieguysFlag
felipe-11
@ChiRep-1 Definitely. Even so, they can bash the film if they want, but DiCaprio's performance is still an Oscar contender.
2 years agoby @felipe-11Flag
SupernaturalFreak
I can't believe J. Edgar only debuted in fifth. I went to see it and it was a great movie. Maybe there wasn't alot of action in it but it didn't need it. It was telling an intriguing story. Leo's performance was great but I also think that Armie Hammer as Clyde Tolson was amazing as well - not to mention kinda sweet. I really liked the slight love story between J. Edgar and Clyde. It was very interesting. I think Leo should get an Oscar for his performance - and I think Armie Hammer should get an Oscar or at least a nomination for his performance. Don't listen to those cynical reviewer hacks!!! J. Edgar deserves to be seen!!!
2 years agoby @supernaturalfreakFlag
ROFLitschristian
Jack and Jill made $26 mil? Bummer...
2 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag
ChiRep_1
@thedude-abides Agreed, it fell to the subject of "critical hype" meaning critics assumed this was a best picture contender and DiCaprio's performance as Oscar worthy.
2 years agoby @ChiRep-1Flag
The First Avenger: JohnnyBlaze
Im officialy done with Society, The fact that Jack and Jill made any kind of money proves that consumers litteraly have NO BRAINS. F&%# you Sandler! and Your God forsaken hold on mindless idiots!
2 years agoby @johnnyblazetb82Flag
felipe-11
Really, society? Jack & Jill at #2?
I can understand Immortals, Puss in Boots, Tower Heist, but Jack & Jill? You've really disappointed me this time.
2 years agoby @felipe-11Flag
thedude-abides
Visually pleasing with little to no substance whatsoever? I could'a guessed this would be #1.
And J. Edgar's 41% I find to be the victim of a hoity toity reviewer base with preconceived expectations of excellence solely because of DiCaprio's performance. 41% is ridiculous. There's no way it's that bad.
2 years agoby @thedude-abidesFlag
ejk1
3% just makes me laugh.
2 years agoby @ejk1Flag
Ghostman
Well, we didn't see that coming...hopefully this gives Henry Cavill more star power in anticipating Man of Steel :)
2 years agoby @ghostmanFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
Least the wrong movie didn't make it number 1
2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Corey W.
Cool. Didn't see either number 1 or 2 this weekend...yet. Seeing Immortals tonight and hoping Jack and Jill pops up online sometime this week.
2 years agoby @coreyFlag
Josh
Is Paranormal Activity 3 the most profitable film of all time? It has to be up there.
2 years agoby @shuabertFlag