AN OPEN LETTER: To Everyone Behind Marketing Cloverfield... and Everyone Who Fell for It

Movie PictureDear Cloverfield Marketing Geniuses And Those Under Their Spell,

Greetings from my tiny temporary abode in Los Angeles, where I have a view of the houses nestled in the hills to my right, and houses crammed in the ground to my left. It's been awhile since I've done one of these Open Letter deals, so pardon the flakes of rust you might see within these words.

Despite my vitriol for the upcoming Cloverfield, I do not call the marketing people behind it geniuses sarcastically. If there was an Oscar, a Pulitzer or even a frickin' Nobel Prize for marketing, everyone involved with the Cloverfield campaign would deserve one, hands down. Sheer, mind-boggling brilliance. Bravo, marketing folk. Bravo, indeed.

Almost anything that can be classified as brilliant, must usually be classified as ballsy as well, and those Cloverfield marketing folks fired one of the ballsiest opening salvo's in movie marketing history. Ah yes. I remember it well...

It was a balmy July evening whence many southeastern Minnesotans and I piled into a theater to see what we all knew would be a blockbuster: Transformers. Most of you who saw that glorious spectacle will likely only remember one trailer they saw that night. I know I do. It was an odd, trippy little trailer with a prodco logo even I hadn't been familiar with. We saw a lot of shaky, The Blair Witch-y footage capped off with a big ruckus in the streets and Lady Liberty's head bouncing down the street like it was a basketball. When it was all said and done, the only thing we got aside from this odd footage was that Bad Robot logo, J.J. Abrams' name (with "From Executive Producer" just barely visible... or memorable) and the cryptic date 1-18-08. No title whatsoever. Amazing. Who'd have the balls to do any sort of trailer and not even put the damn title up? An AC/DC song comes to mind...

I really should've known from the Snakes on a Plane teaser the summer previous, but I figured no one would really give a flying shit about this amateur-ish project that J.J. Abrams somehow seemed fit to exec produce that didn't even have a TITLE for the TRAILER. Oh, how I was wrong.

While most of the talk around my proverbial little water cooler of friends was the movie itself, I was surprised at how many people were taken in by this marketing gimmick. As the resident movie maven, I was summoned upon quite frequently if I had any knowledge of what this "1-18-08" flick was about. Naturally, I had none. I was as befuddled as the rest, but not nearly as interested. I thought that the gimmick would fade, and that people would stop caring... but after so many strategically-placed moves, you brave marketing folk have managed to keep enough of the nation suspended, hell, hypnotized it seems, to the tune of this little movie for SIX MONTHS with a writer and director who've done practically nothing that wasn't under Abrams' wing, and a cast that's done even less. I wonder how many people will be surprised on Friday when they DON'T see J.J. Abrams name under Director...

I personally think this film will blow donkey chunks. It looks like an re-hashed urbanized sort of The Blair Witch Project but with a lot more people trapped in a city except in some stupid woods. We barely have any clue what this thing is really about. We just know that some monster attacks New York City and the monster is supposedly called Cloverfield and blah blah blah. Even the people I ask about it, the fervent fans like even my own brother (sorry bro but I had to do it...) can't even really explain why they're looking forward to this thing so much. Hypnosis, I'm telling you.

It seems even some of us here at MovieWeb were under the spell because, not too long ago, after a rash of questionable Cloverfield stories were thrown up on the site, we all received an email from Headmaster BB that there were to be no more Cloverfield stories without his approval. I can't tell you how happy I was to receive that email because I was, and still am, just plain God-damn tired of hearing about this movie!

I can't wait until Friday night, not so I can rush out to see this, but because the Cloverfield phenomena will, hopefully, be over. This will probably break the decade-long January box office record held by the re-release of Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope, and I'm guessing it'll nab close to $50 million. I'm also hoping it nosedives the weekend after and drops like 75% or something and skids into oblivion just like that gigantic head of the Statue of Liberty in the teaser that started this whole mess.

Will I see Cloverfield in the theater? Sure I will. I've seen enough bad movies in my day I'm sure I could stomach another. Honestly, though, I actually would like to see this on opening weekend, to see how the crowds react after so long of a wait, and, really, I wouldn't mind being proven wrong. The early reviews are fairly positive, but who knows if they hypnotize easily as well. I have heard that our own B. Alan Orange hated the flick, though, and that can't be good news.

If I do actually enjoy the Cloverfield spectacle, I'll write a theatrical review myself, something I haven't done in centuries it seems, and, hell, I'll even link this Open Letter to that review. I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong, but riddle me this: if the damn thing was so great to begin with, why go through all this maniacal marketing mayhem in the first place?

Peace in. Gallagher out!

P.S. The title Cloverfield is actually a reference to the boulevard in Santa Monica where the Bad Robot offices were for this film's production. Chew on that for awhile...

Cloverfield was released January 18th, 2008 and stars Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller, Michael Stahl-David, Mike Vogel, Odette Annable, Anjul Nigam, Margot Farley. The film is directed by Matt Reeves.


Sources: Brian Gallagher

Do you like this story?


RELATED STORIES

Comments (142)

  1. The Kwisatz Haderach

    I liked the film, it wasnt anything great and brand spankin new, but it was different , had its moments.

    4 years agoby @the-kwisatz-haderachFlag

  2. justinishulk

    i have not see it... but i will wait on dvd comes out....

    4 years agoby @justinishulkFlag

  3. Brian Gallagher

    Gotcha, Phatlightning:)

    4 years agoby @gallagherFlag

  4. seti73

    B. Allen Orange didn't like it, and that can't be good news? WTF? Since when was Orange the "be all end all" of movie reviews?

    4 years agoby @seti73Flag

  5. The Narrator: The Better Man

    ok. i am so tired of this. stop with the cloverfield sh*t. it was ok. now lets move on.

    4 years agoby @narratorFlag

  6. THE JOKER

    well i agree the movie wasnt the best but in one good aspect, Hollywood is actually trying to make something new rather than just do a lot of remakes. Which in its self was the good thing about this film. Sure i love the remakes, but it was about time they also try something new.

    4 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  7. Phatlightning

    thats what I was trying to get across, is that your prediction was damn close and that the movie tanked the second week, like I hoped it would

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag

  8. Brian Gallagher

    That is all? I hope you're being sarcastic because that is a HUGE drop and it seems that my prediction was pretty damn accurate now, wasn't it?:)

    4 years agoby @gallagherFlag

  9. Phatlightning

    -68%, that is all.

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag

  10. Harout Harman

    That wasnt a fair review lol

    4 years agoby @micetro9345Flag

  11. Fuzion

    That would be great!

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  12. Brian Gallagher

    Completely in agreement Fuzion. I'm totally looking forward to The Rum Diary, if that ever gets off the ground. IMDB says it is looking to start after Depp finishes Shantaram. Who knows tho.

    4 years agoby @gallagherFlag

  13. Fuzion

    Civility kicks ass. Lol.

    Oh, you better believe I have the Criterion Collection... and I love it, as I assume you do. Among the best purchases I've ever made!

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  14. tremendoustroy67

    This movie sucked big time!!I was very disappointed

    4 years agoby @tremendoustroy67Flag

  15. Brian Gallagher

    Word. Civility. Gracias Fuzion. I feel the same way about both the book and the movie as you do. Do you have the Criterion Collection of Fear and Loathing? If not I suggest you pick it up post haste! Amazing stuff.

    Gallagher

    4 years agoby @gallagherFlag

  16. Fuzion

    Indeed.
    I'm not here to tell anyone they're wrong or stupid (although it's hard to resist sometimes on these online forums), so an agreement to disagree is certainly in order. Further bickering serves no point.

    Fear and Loathing is both one of my favorite movies and favorite books of all time. :)

    On a final note... I have really no interest in seeing Rambo. At least not until a DVD release... and to be honest, I'll just download and burn it.

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  17. Brian Gallagher

    Actually, there really wasn't much more to the movie than what you described. The dopey stories about these individual characters were cliche and irritating, at best.

    By the way, thanks for noticing the Fear and Loathing aspect. Much obliged.

    Its quite obvious that I disagree with your stance, Fuzion and almost everyone else here, so I'm just gonna leave it at that and retort no more. I'm just sick of talking about this friggin movie. I'm not backing down from my stance on it, it's just that it seems I keep reiterating the same damn things over and over again in these comments and it's annoying. Lets just agree to disagree, so they say.

    Hopefully it drops 60 or 70% this weekend, but I highly doubt it. Oh well. Time to move on. Bring on Rambo!

    Gallagher

    4 years agoby @gallagherFlag

  18. Fuzion

    I'll definitely agree that a 30-second commercial isn't the BEST representation of the whole movie, but it gave the main points. People trying to survive a monster attack on NYC, with shakey, doc*mentary-style camerawork.

    Obviously there was more to the movie than that, but those seem to be the subject of complaints.

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  19. The Narrator: The Better Man

    good article. sorry for being so judgemental about the film. it turned out ok. not a favorite or anything, but o.k.

    4 years agoby @narratorFlag

  20. Phatlightning

    yes but a 30 second commercial can't portray an entire movie, especially with the shakyness of the camera shots and such, so I can see how people can still be pretty disappointed because it wasn't what they were expecting

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag

  21. Fuzion

    Yeah, the marketing group did a GREAT job. But it's not like they made false commercials. The commercials were a great representation of the movie, in fact.

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  22. Phatlightning

    no, that just means the marketing group did their job

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag

  23. Fuzion

    I never claimed one should have to do homework before watching a movie, but if you don't, it's your own fault if afterwards you're disappointed because you thought it was going to be something different.

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  24. T.Clark

    Exactly, Joker. This is original. Sure we've seen alot of monster movies, but this was different, mostly due to the fact it was shot with the video camera, but even the monster was different. They couldn't make it like Godzilla, or people would say it was a rip-off. It was unique and a very good movie.

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  25. Brian

    Why should you have to "do homework" to watch any movie?

    4 years agoby @brianFlag

  26. THE JOKER

    wow some heated stuff here! Now i personally liked the film. yeah it wasnt extremely frightening but then again i dont remember them saying this was a horror flick. king Kong was excellent and it wasnt scary and it was about a giant monster. I would have rather of seen the film from like imax cameras and not from home camera view but i do need to give credit that that was very creative on their part. It was something new and is that not what alot of us have been asking for on here, for Hollywood to come up with something new and not just keep remaking everything that doesnt need to be remade. and thats what this is. i thought the monster was cool looking as well. it was different. this wasnt godzilla so they couldnt make something that looks like him. it wasnt their design. they wanted their own thing. and they gave it to us.

    4 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

  27. Phatlightning

    "Unlike 99% of the people that didn't like the movie, I did my homework, and knew exactly what this movie was going to be about, which made a big contribution to my not being disappointed."

    You shouldn't have to do "homework" before seeing a film.. whats the fun in seeing a film if you know "exactly what this movie was going to be about" prior to seeing it..

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag

  28. Fuzion

    Weaknesses in this movie, if one should even go so far as to say there were multiple, were few and far between.

    Solid film. Amazing effects, some of the better, more natural-feeling acting I've seen in quite some time (and by virtual unknowns at that), and an awesome story.

    I've read and heard complaints from far too many people because of the fact that this wasn't a retarded Godzilla wannabe. But you just know that if it had been, those same people would've been crying "rip-off!"

    I walked into the theater very excited about this movie and walked out doubly hyped, as it exceeded my high expectations.

    While I realize that there were probably plenty of people who were "hypnotized," as you say, by the viral marketing campaign of this movie, it's a little absurd to place anyone who was excited about this film into that category. You're always going to have the sheep of society who flock to whatever has buzz around it. You're group logic, however, makes no mention of people like myself, who had a genuine interest in this movie. I've already had a few people tell me that I was "tricked [by the viral marketing campaign] into" seeing Cloverfield. I assure you, that was not the case. Unlike 99% of the people that didn't like the movie, I did my homework, and knew exactly what this movie was going to be about, which made a big contribution to my not being disappointed. Massive amounts of morons went to see a movie about a monster told from a traditional third person p.o.v., with detailed answers on the species, origin, and history of the beast (which would undoubtedly have more screen time than the actors), and a fairy-tale happy ending. Those that were expecting Cloverfield to be that movie (or to have any one of those things, for that matter) only have themselves to blame.

    I will, however, reluctantly give you the slightest of nods for making me laugh with your comparison of the sounds of the monsters in the tunnel to a post-adrenochrome Raoul Duke in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Well-played, sir.

    4 years agoby @fuzionFlag

  29. Shenanigans

    It's a f*cking movie dude!! You DO have your opinion. But you don't have to be a dick about it! Who cares if you think the movie sucks, no one gives two sh*ts. Just like you don't give two sh*ts about Cloverfield.

    4 years agoby @kmm1482Flag

  30. Shenanigans

    Hey Gallagher, it's because some of us haven't seen it yet! God, talk about pretentious! "Oh, I'm Gallagher! This movie will suck! I'm right, you're wrong! SEE!! SEE!! I'M RIGHT!! I'm king of all movies!"

    4 years agoby @kmm1482Flag

(More)Recent Activity