dark thing sorry.

It has to be "The Caped Crusader" it just makes sense. I think he will grow ounce again after The Dark Knight and be done with his "I can't endure this" attitude, and finally will come to terms with the fact that Gotham will always need him. It makes sense him being called The Dark Knight in this film because were going to see the Batman that is being overwhelmed and does his questionable things and is boarder line psycho. At the end of the day everyone in Gotham will label him The Caped Crusader not The Dark Knight, it would make more sense that after all he's endured that the citizens will give him that name because people will come to terms with his heroics are a need in Gotham so it will no longer be a dark for him to be doing what he's doing. So Caped Crusader all the way for me.

they could name the movie after a villain. i know its a stupid idea but it would depend on the villain

Agreed.

Look i think Batman or The Dark Knight should not be in the title for the next one

No offense "walkingsaint009," but that doesn't sound like it'd be worth a near hour of my time to download on my crappy PC since it doesn't reveal or show much of anything. Plus, "Batman 3" sounds like a direct to video sequel shot in Mexico with Party America children's costumes rather than an extremely over priced budget blockbuster summer movie like "The Dark Knight."

Think about it this way. How does this ring if you were to repeat it to someone?:

"Batman Begins" (2005)
"The Dark Knight" (2008)
"Batman 3" (2011)

Yeah, sounds a bit cheezy to me. But that's just me.

Nobody cares about a written trailer

The Caped Crusader? No offense but he sounds like a bitch. If they called it "The Dark Knight Returns" they would have to explain that its not based on the graphic novel.

but what aboutmy trailer idea

I don't think neone would take the name "caped crusader" seriously...

That's kinda cheezy.

And "Dark Knight Returns" implies that it'll be based on the graphic novel of the same name by Kevin Smith.

The first film featured the name "Batman" in the title since it seems that he was hating all forms of crime, such as "Stop it! Get rid of it! Irradicate it!" and now with the name "Dark Knight" it seems to imply that he'll cross the line of being a hero to do villainous things to stop the bad guys (which has been expressed in the trailers). Each of these personalities are demonstrated in the comics. So for the 3rd, how about "The Caped Crusader?"

If ur wondering what the next movie's title, if they're making one, should be, it should be BATMAN: WAR ON CRIME. Bee-yaw

I like it. It's catchy.

how bout this trailer for batman 3 ?the camera shows a pitch black alley then cats start pouring out of the alley and finally a black cat steps out and stops then the camera zooms in to the cats beautiful black eyes and you see the dark knight and then a womens hand covered in leather picks up the cat . BATMAN 3

how bout Gotham's Knight

I know, just me being my sarcastic self.

already taken..lol

How about "Batman Returns?" That sounds like a keeper to me!!!!!

the dark knight returns.

what i am wondering is if they do make a third movie, what the hell are they gonna call it? The caped crusader or something? lol. Bring on the Dark Knight baybe!!

yep i cant wait im gonna see the midnight show

3 weeks to go before it opens!!!! & counting!!!

awsome

thank you sly know a lot about movies and this has been around for awhile

I've heard the same stuff that JR is saying from other people too. Plus, an assumption can't be made that Joker will return for "3," cuz that'd be a waste of screen-time, and they'd need to do him justice. Plus, whether or not he actually dies in the explosion is p for grabs. That could just be assumed. I can't imagine that a villain like this won't be taken down by Batman, at least in this film or the next, since superhero flicks can break the trilogy rules, and characters can die, whether Nolan said they would or not. Plus, we already knew that Scarecrow got a tiny role, and that Two-Face is only in the last reel of the film. So this stuff was kinda already known. Cuz after all, Batman can't fly. He glides. So how can he catch Rachel in a downward dive like fall from Joker pushing her out the window? Plus, she's got no story responsibilities. So there doesn't seem to be a place for her in the cilmax of the film (as of yet). Since these flicks aren't about damsels in distress like all 3 Spider-Man films.

The only thing i've read about Anthony Michael Hall is on this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Riddler

Scroll down about 85% and you'll see "Nolan Series" in bold letters. This is what it says:

Nolan series
Director Christopher Nolan took the helm as director of the new Batman franchise with the 2005 film Batman Begins and the upcoming 2008 film The Dark Knight.

David Tennant has expressed an interest in portraying the Riddler in a future Batman movie, as has Frasier star David Hyde-Pierce.
In the viral marketing for The Dark Knight, Edward Nashton, one of the alias of The Riddler, is credited for writing an editorial in The Gotham Times Volume 2 which features an article about a Batman statue being added to the Wax Museum as well. Madame Soleil's Wax Museum was used in a 1966 episode of the Batman TV series, where the Riddler used a Batman statue to smuggle in a 'Universal Wax Solvent' from France, to be used later against Batman. Anthony Michael Hall was rumored for the role; however, it has been revealed that Hall is playing a reporter named Mike Engel.
While doing press for The Dark Knight, Gary Oldman alluded that the Riddler would be the villain in the proposed third film.[5]

Take it for what it is... a grain of salt.

I read that news in wizard magazine err. I forgot all about it when the whole riddler thing got going. I'm gonna keep my eye out for AMH in dark knight, no matter what JR says, cuz he's prolly lying

trust me they had special screenings like world premire type even in a review it says that look it up tdk video review

I seriously doubt it, screenings this early are reserved for big and famous celebrities, Howard Stern is one I know gets it. So I refuse to believe that.

well i found the article about a.m.h. joining the cast here:
http://www.movieweb.com/news/17/19917.php

but all it says is that he signed a confidentiality agreement stating he would give any info away on his character.

off hand i dont remember where i read the ed nigma connection, but apparently it wasnt here, and i cant verify that whatever i read was anything but an unfounded rumor.