Risky Biz Blog has reported that Lionsgate and Nu Image/Millennium may have found the star for their
Conan remake: 41-year-old Austrian actor Roland Kickinger, who is in talks to play the role that Arnold Schwarzenegger christened in the 1982 classic
Conan The Barbarian.
Apparently, there are some other uncanny similarities: Kickinger is also a bodybuilder-turned-actor from the Central European country, and he also had a role as a T-800 in the
Terminator Salvation.
Kickinger also played a
Conan The Barbarian-era version of Schwarzenegger in
See Arnold Run, the 2005 A&E biopic about the actor-turned-politician.
Shooting will begin in the fall at Avi Lerner's Bulgaria-based studio. Marcus Nispel (
Friday the 13th) will direct.
30 Comments
LMAO
But this...
We need another VIS rant to sum it all up. ;)
Why did they cast a Christopher Reeve look-a-like for Superman Returns?
I CALLED THIS....Perfect Cast Role.
Erm, this guy did play Arnie in his Biopic entitled 'Running Arnold/Arnie'
Henceforth why i stated his the best cast role for the job.
Agent Vis is corrent, according to current sources, this adaptation will be more faithful to the original stories created by Robert E. Howard.
Personally i think they will adapt from the Conan Comics not the Novels, but that is my opinion.
And Remy...The Rock as Conan....GTFO
Kickinger pwns Rock
&
Arnie pwns Kickinger who pwns Rock
&
Kickinger played Arnie
Do the maths...
i hadn't considered that.
But maybe I was just referring to electroshock therapy, which is exactly what the producers of this movie need to wake them up...
etc. is an abbreviation for etcetera, which is not spelled ectetera.
UPDATE: Roland Kickinger is not Conan...Wait he is!...ect...ect...
And Pathfinder wasn't that bad, I thought the look and feel the way it was shot was awesome, some scnes looked Boris paintings.
And im sorry the Arnold conan films ae not that epic at all, but it doesnt matter I want to see another conan film.
Conan is like any other pre-existing character. Different incarnations can be presented on screen. It's been done with Batman, Superman, the Hulk...they ONLY reason that people are pissed about this is because Arnold was in the original movie. That doesn't mean you can just ignore the fact that the movie ignored the original stories by Robert E. Howard. I've read this movie will follow those stories more closely, making it an adaptation, not a remake. If it doesn't follow the stories, then I still won't care...Batman Begins reinvigorated Batman, maybe this can do the same with Conan. I don't like the choice of director, I'll give you that, but I'm not pissed just because it's a "remake." The movie has potential, but I don't think the director can make it as epic as it could be, and THAT will be it's downfall, not the fact that Arnold isn't in it. Nothing's set in stone just because the Governator starred.
SECOND MISTAKE: getting Marcus Nispel to direct, just cause he did PATHFINDER, another poor fantasy/historical
THIRD MISTAKE: lead casting this poor sap as conan
this film is doomed and i don't care the least about it. FAIL, FAIL, FAIL.