Disney Drops Out of The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of The Dawn Treader

well chronicles of narnia prince caspian was the first narnia movie I've seen and from my opinion the movie was great.i mean it told the story and had alot of action which was nice i think it was a pretty good movie overall. i dont see why disney wouldnt want to make another i mean just because the second doesnt do as good as the first doesnt mean you shouldnt make another one.

Thanks Chad. My thoughts exactly.

Another thing to look at SuperCanaya, is the evolution of writing. Kids today are surprisingly bright and the market is aimed for children's books to have adult appeal. Lewis's Narnia books were written between 1949 and 1954, for his children, initially without thinking of publishing them, let alone having films made out of them. Narnia was the "Harry Potter" equivalent for that time. Judging a work by modern standards is preposterous. It's for CHILDREN. DUH! It's not like 2001 (film) where "stupid people" can't understand the ending. Oh well. If you don't even know what Bernstein Bears or Franklin the Turtle is, then you don't know what your talking about.

Thank god...the last one was a piece of shit!

Harry Potter are kids books, but are intelligent and well planned. The first time think with stupid book but when I read it I understand why it is so popular. Eay to read is becouse the plot is very simple and predictable, very low book for a great philosopher and writer, C.S. Lewis. My grammar/spelling are bad becouse I speaking english but I dont write well, im not from Usa or England.
Bernstein Bears or Franklin the Turtle movie?. Whats that?

hahahahaha. WOW I can't believe this. I agree with Chad Vital.

They are kids books supercanayaz... I hope you are joking cause that was probably thee dumbest thing I have ever read lol. "They are easy to read" lmao. Duh! Let me guess, if they make a Bernstein Bears or Franklin the Turtle movie, you will be here again one day saying "form me the books are weeks a easy too read" (btw, wtf to your grammar/spelling and word usuage lol?). Did you know they are filming Where the Wild Things are? Anyway, that "book" is really really easy to read and that's the point because wait get this, it's aimed for children OMG!!!! How can that be?! Someone hurry and document this, books for kids aimed for...kids! OMG!!! lol

Is my opinion, Diaigma, form me the books are weeks a easy too read

The films are just fine, just bad directors and the wrong actors to lead the parts. The Books are very weak to begin with, why do you think the films suck in the first place? That is the main problem.

Well, they should make the last battle the movie becasue it will end the series.

... How did Lewis drop the ball with Chronicles, Comrade, CanayaZ? Yes, the movies weren't handled well, bad casting, but the books weren't that bad. He wrote them for his kids and someone published them. He didn't know it would become popular, or a major motion picture franchise. A great philosopher Lewis was, but it's refreshing that he concocted the epic fairytale/fantasy genre as well. I give him that much credit at least, for venturing out of his element.

Mother fing glory of up urs fox.

Why they got be such arsewipes.
I gotta wait to see the bloody rest of Watchmen, them bloody 30minutes were amazing and now i gotta wait.

Fox can bite Eddie Murphy's Ass with a Riddler questionmark on it

I hate FOX too, don't sweat it, they're pricks.
SuperCanay has a point. For such a great philosopher and writer, C.S. Lewis really dropped the ball on Chronicles.

OMG I hate FOX. srry for all who likes it, but till now none of the fox movies this year are really that good. I mean look at it siriously, the day the earth stood still, city of ember was also produced by fox and many other movies were not that good. I really really really liked disney being able to bring us chronicles of narnia. I hate FOX thiss year it sucked.
No offence to everyone who likes it that's just my opinion.

Same thing should be done for Twilight.

Chronicles of Narnia sucks the books and the movies

THIS JUST IN: FOX HAS WON THE WATCHMEN RULING AND RELEASE DATE IS SURE TO BE PUSHED BACK!...MOTHER OF ASS!!

caspian was good (not great), but for disney to bail is WEAK!

prince caspian sucked

I agrre with wizdomes comment.. Caspian seemed to bring Narnia to a halt!!

too bad....

I had a feeling this would happen, Prince Caspian was a disappointment in a way and it slowed the momentum of the fantasy series, unfortunately this has affected the third movie - hopefully another studio will pick it up.

as in Part 3 of Narnia (Voyage)

Whats pt3?

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe was real good but The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian kind of sucked but looking forward to pt 3 still.

Frenzy, Disney did not, repeat NOT, make any movies with Pixar. Disney bought the distributing rights, cheap, I might add. The founder, John Lasseter, left Disney, for non-benevolent reasons, and started Pixar, to which the successes of Luxo Jr. and other early works gathered Disney's attention and they nabbed the studio's distrubting rights early, long before Toy Story was released. They've done the same thing with Hayao Miyazaki's Studio Ghibli films to distribute them in America, making terrible English dubs too, I will add again.

Pixar is its own affiliation. Would you say Paramount makes movies WITH Dreamworks Animation? No. Paramount owns the distributing rights. Pixar is Disney's crutch, and they know it, and unlike Paramount, they will squeeze their name onto anything worthwhile, to save face more than money. Disney Studios does not care about quality anymore. Walt has rolled over in his grave several times by now, I'm sure.

The only thing's that Disney's done decently since 1996 was Emperor's New Grove, Tarzan, Brother Bear, National Treasure 1, Pirates 1, Enchanted. Everything else is a rehash, pop-culture gag, sorry remakes, or poorly conceived sequels.

Anyway, I'm glad Disney is pulling out. Besides, it's Walden Media that's making the films with Disney's money. All Disney's good for anymore is paying studios to make/release movies for them, as long as they get their name slapped above the title.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/companycredits

I may sound like a Disney hater, but if you knew some of the stunts they've pulled since 1994, as I do, you'd question their ethics as film makers. Many of the best animation pioneers LEFT Disney at one time or another (Richard Rich, Don Bluth, John Sanford (not the author), and Brad Bird). That should tell you something.

Despite my distaste for current Disney fair, I REALLY hope Christmas Carol and Prince of Persia are done well, and hopefully amend some of their ways, as they are involved in making them.

OK Fanboy, here's just the ones I like. This isn't counting the ones that while they were good, I didn't care for...

Any of the movies Disney did with Pixar, the other 2 Narnia movies, The Lion King, Aladin, Beauty and the Beast, Hercules, all 3 Pirates of the Carribean, Glory Road, Invincible, National Treasure, Remember the Titans, The Three Musketeers (live action), Cool Runnings, and a # of others that at the very least were fun to watch.

I hope this doesn't completely kill the 3rd installment.

They did because of the money. If they had a december release date, like the first one, this probably wouldn't be happening right now.

I said that of the 3 pirates movies that the first one was the best.Disney has made good movies like Finding Nemo and Holes.

Fanboy:
Peter Pan. The Great Mouse Detective. Or were you only looking for live action? In which case, I should be allowed to include any movies I want from the Touchstone catalogue.

Outlaw is correct; however it's not just Disney that does that. I think the only larger studios that will pay attention to smaller, riskier films are Focus Features and Lionsgate.

name one good disney film??? let me guess you can only think of the first pirates one