Our friends over at
Bloody Disgusting stumbled upon some interesting news this morning. According to their sources, Legendary Pictures is gearing up to resurrect Japan's most famous giant monster
Godzilla.
Details are sketchy, though it seems early discussions have begun. One thing that seems certain is that this will not be a sequel to Roland Emmerich's 1998
Godzilla, which has been mocked relentlessly by its Japanese counterparts in recent films such as
Godzilla: Final Wars. It's safe to say that we are looking at what those in the industry like to call a "reboot".
While this news is still fresh and out of the box, there's no word on exactly what we can expect.
Bloody Disgusting is on the case, though. And we will let you know when we hear more from them.
34 Comments
No.
The whole point of Cloverfield was to make an original monster movie for Americans.
This new movie I hope won't follow the Japanese version and design too close to the fat ass, sloooooow monster they have.
As for the origins of Godzilla, a good way to sort of tie in Godzilla to King Kong, (be free to use this Ottley if you want lol) since, Godzilla was originally a Godzillasaurus in the movies, he could be from skull island, and then due to nuclear testing, he becomes godzilla and hibernates in the ocean for many years before being disrupted and basically freaking out on the nearest landmass. That's a good reboot.
And as for Director, I would say to not use JJ, since he's had a taste of the monster world and is still going on about with CL2.
Then there's Peter Jackson, who could do well with tying it together with his King Kong,
but as amazing as it was, King Kong was powerfully boring in the beginning.
I believe that maybe if Peter Jackson was a producer and Michael Bay directed, we would have the perfect monster movie.
Same here...well, not so much Emmerich's version, but just Godzilla as a whole. The movies were probably my first venture into what people could do with a camera and imagination...I mean, a giant mutated dinosaur that breathed fire and battled a huge fucking moth?!?! When I was a kid, that was like crack lmao
And when i actually think about it, Raimi could do a really good job after seing the giant sandman in the end of S-M-3, that states he does giant monster stuff.
And for me working on a draft, i wish i could, but iv'e so much other work of my own in development i would not have time, but someday i will do something on it.
Godzilla should be made in a proper old school fashion like Kong, so they can make the bridge scene work out emotionally. Heck, if things really work out for it, why not make a Godzilla Vs Kong all over again.
Godzilla rules.
Godzilla's look is constantly changing. In the first few movies he was a tough sonuvabitch who toppled buildings. Once Godzilla vs. King Kong was a hit and Japan got the idea that pitting him against a different monster every movie was a good idea, his snout got shorter, his eyes bigger, and, let's face it, he became kind of a wimp. Then came Godzilla 2000 and it looked like he was jacked up on nuclear steroids. Throughout the course of the movies, his personality, or whatever you wanna call it, changed, too. The first flick introduced him as a big monster that destroyed stuff with no regard for human lives. As the series progressed, he became more of a "hero" because he faught off alien threats. He's even been presented as a father figure.
Therefore, "Godzilla purists" can fuck off. Nothing's ever been consistent about Godzilla.
Newkill200, Hilarious man!"...It's a fucking lizard. Godzilla is not a lizard. It's a fucking creature monster". LOL!
On to directors
On Micahel Bay, i agree with Vis, MB is very poor at creating character development, and well a project scale like this needs some human interaction.
Raimi, i know his attached to Spidey & Warcraft, in hwich honestly i don't see Warcraft going any where, but id like to see his take on this could be very intresting.
J.J, yeah it would just seem like a repetition of Cloverfield all over again, so no thanks, focus on M.I.4 & Star Trek 2 & 3, J.J
J.J is perfect for the job, i don't think i want to see Raimi do this. I would personnaly love to see Burton take a shot, making it look old school like Kong.
Emmerich's version was the first movie I ever saw in a theater. I was five. Maybe it holds a "sweet spot" but I think it's pretty good. If the name "Godzilla" wasn't attached to it, people would have thought it was an awesome monster flick. HOWEVER, that's not to say it didn't have faults and I definitely think Hollywood should resurrect Godzilla on the big screen in a way that stays more true to the original films.
As far as a director goes, Michael Bay wouldn't work. Yes, he's destructive. Yes, I liked the Transformers movies. BUT, the Transformers actually have personalities. Bay's action-oriented style worked for those movies because he could throw in some interaction between the robots while still using his prized special effects. Godzilla is different. He'd have to introduce real-human interaction, too. I don't bash him as much as most do for that...I thought Armageddon was pretty emotional. But I'd rather he stick to the robots because for this movie to succeed, it needs to be more than "destructive."
My vote would be J.J. Abrams. Producer of Cloverfield, director of Star Trek...he's nearly perfect for it if he wasn't committed to the new Star Trek series. My second pick would be Sam Raimi...too bad he's already attached to Spider-Man and Warcraft.