'Wrath of the Titans' Critic Reviews

73%
MovieWeb:   16 reviews
26%
Rotten Tomatoes:   165 reviews
  • James Verniere Boston Herald
    50
    'Wrath of the Titans' is a Greek tragedy...I felt like I was being pounded to death by the theater's subwoofers and having things flung at me from the screen.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Brian Tallerico HollywoodChicago.com
    30
    This is filmmaking without personality, a movie that doesn't just feel like watching someone else play a video game but like it was actually made by a computer program.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Richelle Jackson MovieFIX
    70
    It's a rollicking ride with some of the best use of 3D that I've seen since Avatar.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Marshall Fine Hollywood & Fine
    Generally afraid to actually let you focus on any of his digital creations too long, lest the seams show...never stops to let you get a fix on what they actually look like.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Jason Zingale Bullz-Eye.com
    30
    For a movie featuring so many iconic mythological figures, the battles are completely void of excitement, none more so than the climactic showdown with Kronos.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Tom Clift Moviedex
    50
    Even when the action is unintelligible, it's at least better than listening to the characters talk.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Tony Medley Tolucan Times
    40
    ...nothing but mindless special effects.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Jason Best Movie Talk
    Rosamund Pike is hilariously miscast. Her plummy voice ringing out amid the film's mish-mash of accents, she rallies her troops looking and sounding less like a mythological heroine than a lacrosse captain rousing her team on the school playing field.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Graham Young Birmingham Mail
    60
    Wrath of the Titans won't get anyone through their exams in Greek mythology - but it will pop your eyes as well as your corn.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Peter Paras E! Online
    42
    Mercifully short and only terribly mediocre.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Jim Slotek Jam! Movies
    40
    Wrath of the Audience -- that's a movie I'd pay to see.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • David Jenkins Little White Lies
    20
    So little plot and character that you'd be hard pressed to call this a 'film' in the strictest definition of the term.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Eric Melin Scene-Stealers.com
    38
    Wrath of the Titans is fluff, for sure, but it's not even lighthearted cotton candy. It's more like a convenience store burrito.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Daniel Eagan Film Journal International
    Greek gods and demigods return in a spiffed-up adventure involving Hydras, Cyclops, and Kronos himself. Strong 3D effects help make this worth seeing.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Kevin Carr 7M Pictures
    60
    In the end, I was mildly entertained. Wrath of the Titans isn't a great movie, and it's possibly not even a good movie. But I wasn't expecting anything more.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Steven D. Greydanus Christianity Today
    17
    Next to Perseus and his world, John Carter is as colorful as Tony Stark and Barsoom is as colorful as Pandora.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Michael Simms FILMINK (Australia)
    It might be trash, but for those willing to forgive the bland narrative, Wrath Of The Titans is a relatively fun and spectacular adventure.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Mick LaSalle San Francisco Chronicle
    50
    A movie in which whole sequences consist of nothing but guys fighting stiff computer images. Such scenes would be boring even were they done well, but these scenes aren't done well.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Jeanne Kaplan Kaplan vs. Kaplan
    My first clue that this was going to be a disaster was the director, Jonathan Liebesman, who also directed "Battle Los Angeles".
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Rebecca Murray About.com
    42
    This is just more of the same, without nearly as much spirit but with slightly better fight scenes.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • MaryAnn Johanson Flick Filosopher
    [I]ncompetent on the most basic levels. There's no physical or narrative context for anything... It's bewildering. It's mind-boggling. It can only be the work of trickster gods attempting to drive us mad.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Alex Zane Sun Online
    40
    The film is better than the first (not a difficult achievement), especially the 3D. But flashy visuals do not a good movie make and the script is rubbish.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Brian Orndorf BrianOrndorf.com
    50
    At the very least, this new adventure has stronger CGI and 3D, but there's not enough improvement in production imagination to make this second chapter leap off the screen.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Chris Bumbray JoBlo's Movie Emporium
    50
    If you liked the last one you'll probably enjoy this one too. Not the worst film ever, but totally disposable. In one ear, and out the other...
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Laura Clifford Reeling Reviews
    42
    If the first film was humorless, its sequel is guilty of misplaced laughs.
    Full Review » 3 years ago