Watchmen: Review By chanto21

Mar 8th, 2009 by chanto21
not bad could have been better
  • OVERALL
    3.5
    GREAT
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Visuals
ok this movie was a prime example of rushing because pretty much the writer tried to fit a hole comic book series into one movie and to me they still left a huge portion of facts and details out that i think where very important and also from my point of view would have made this movie a lot more how you say tasteful and understanding as well as a little more true to those that have never read the comic to me yes this movie could have been a lot better but it wasn't to bad this is a movie to see one or even two times and that's it for me the whole watchmen experience was a little boring yet it did have it's exciting parts

Do you like this review?

Comments (7)

  1. ed_wood

    This was by no stretch a rush job. Snyder took his time with the material and it shows. I can't wait to see the full cut.

    3 years agoby @ed-woodFlag

  2. Shelley

    The opening credits did not take 30 minutes. During the opening credits they give you some history, but I guess you missed that.

    I agree completely Vamp.

    3 years agoby @shelleyFlag

  3. Soulflyz

    Movie was lame and took to much of my time up. The opening credits alone took 30 mins. By time the movie started i was already falling asleep.

    3 years agoby @soulflyzFlag

  4. The First Avenger: JohnnyBlaze

    agree with your headline

    3 years agoby @johnnyblazetb82Flag

  5. GK

    I agree with Vamp lol.

    3 years agoby @indianajonesFlag

  6. Vamp

    Grammar, anyone?

    3 years agoby @vampire2000Flag

  7. T.Clark

    They didn't rush. In fact, it was quite the opposite. Snyder's attention to detail was astounding. They had to cut scenes out due to run time. It'll all be on the Director's Cut DVD

    3 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag