To leave a comment, please sign in or use Facebook or Twitter
2 months agoby @mm61675Flag
Great Coen movie
7 months agoby @Haris-AslanidisFlag
This movie was fantastic!! They brought it up to speed with 2010 culture
2 years agoby @christinegmwebFlag
I like Jeff Bridges, but there is no way this remake is as good as the 1969 original with John Wayne. Just my humble opinion, folks.
2 years agoby @colocatFlag
So what if it doesn't have sex in it;A lot of movies don't....Go watch a porno ya freaks!!!!!!
2 years agoby @titanictomFlag
@chris f*ck you theres no sex scenes in this movie so it sucks ass just like u
2 years agoby @TheAbsolutelyPhenomenalCriticFlag
I liked it definitely worth watching
2 years agoby @unknown21Flag
In summary, I really must say don't waste your money going to see this one. The script was poorly written, which resulted in gaping holes in the story line.
2 years agoby @fortberryFlag
How John Wayne would have reacted to the news of the remake of his movie True Grit http://goo.gl/mZCoX
2 years agoby @claudio-marinaccioFlag
Think of how much more revenue this film will get, @LoPan :)
2 years agoby @diaigmaFlag
i would have liked this film to be rated R. but i shouldnt complain if it still good!
2 years agoby @mr-davidlopanFlag
I need to read it, see how it is :)
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
@Supes like Diaigma said, the book really doesn't equate to a rated-R adaption
2 years agoby @Ilikepie202Flag
@Diaigma I know, really! This is going to be a heavy PG-13 film. I really do not give a rats ass what the rating is. If it was G, maybe a little. But I haven't read the book. And 95% is still a frggin good rating. That's a 4.75/5 stars pretty much.
Exactly. For some movies, its rating doesn't matter, it's how well the story is played out, amongst other things. This is obvious storyline driven, so excessive violence and profanity isn't a necessity and probably wouldn't have added anything to the movie overall. Now you take a movie like the Alien prequel they want to, that is a different story. When you got aliens that incubate inside humans and burst out of them, you either go for broke and make that sh*t realistic and bloody, or you don't do it at all. A time and place for everything, including proper ratings :D
Seriously. If you've read the novel, you'll see that it doesn't exactly equate to an R rated adaptation. A hard PG-13, sure, but why does the rating matter anyway? RT has it set at 95% at the moment. It could be rated G (like the original) and I'd still go see it with a percentage that high :P
@D lmao... kind of a captain obvious question there, eh? Love that response :P
PG-13 - for some intense sequences of western violence including disturbing images :P
but why is it pg-13?
This is going to be awesome, I hope better than No Country For Old Men, it probably won't hough.
Meh. The only thing John did different for the first Grit was put on an eye patch. This movie is truer to the novel, I hear :P
This movie is a Remake:The original came out in 1969. John Wayne won an academy award for his role as Rubin "Rooster" J Cogbern and it spawed a sequel that came out 3 years later.No doubt they will do the sequel as well! I like Jeff Bridges..But John Wayne was/is Better!!!!
@moviegeek I don't care what it's rated. The reviews are fantastic and it has a great cast. I'm seeing it Christmas Day
"True" that :P
That PG-13 won't stop me from seeing it.
What's wrong with that, @geek? The original was rated G. At least with PG-13 it'll have more "grit" than the other did. And the reviews are glowing so far. 94%. That's more than enough to get me there opening day :)
Looking forward to this one. We never get westerns anymore. Though, "Red Hill" came out this year. Very limited though...
3 years agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
THIS MOVIE IS PG-13!!!! WHHHATTT!?
3 years agoby @moviegeekFlag
Idiot below me.
3 years agoby @dan1Flag
This is BS! Why can't Hollywood be more original and create "new" movies ... has all the imagination gone? This is a classic John Wayne picture and no one, not Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon or Josh Brolin are going to do it any better than the Duke did it ... "hands off" Coen brothers! Your ideas are idiotic!
3 years agoby @parrismrFlag