Transporter 3: Review By MovieGuyMatt
Another Ad for Audi...
-
OVERALL3.0WORTHY
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
The second one, on the other hand, was a steaming pile of dung. It was horrid. It was so bad, I am not devoting anymore words to describing its sheer idiocy.
On to Transporter 3. When I heard they were making yet another Transporter film, my first thought was, "Oh God, NO, please no!" After the debacle that was the second film I was very hesitant to sit through another outing with Frank and his souped up Audi. So, needless to say, I went in with a very low expectation.
To my surprise, the action sequences in this flick by Director Olivier Megaton were not orgies of rapid edits and bouts of frantic shaky cam. Nor were they perfect. There were still too many edits for my taste. I like to see the beautiful choreography that these stunt men and women spend so much blood, sweat, and tears trying to perfect. Quick edits tend to make things seem faster, but in my humble opinion, they also make them less impacting.
The story this time around centers mainly on the gimmick of a metal bracelet that has been attached to Frank's wrist quite against his will. The bracelet is filled with a liquid explosive and a transmitter. If Frank gets more than 75 feet from the car, he blows up. I thought this addition was a smart concept. I mean, think about it. We're talking about a film based entirely on the idea that the Protagonist must take something from one place, safely to another place...how many stories can you come up with based on this idea? Adding the exploding bracelet was a fun way to make things more interesting. Aside from this, however, there wasn't a whole lot in the way of story. They did try and get a little deeper this time around, attempting to build a relationship between Jason Statham's character, and the female lead. It was, I thought, a rather ham fisted attempt, and one that was fairly unnecessary.
I really like Jason Statham, and I wish he would be in more great action roles. He seems to have taken up the mantle that we all thought Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson and Vin Diesel were going pick up. We NEED a new, young action star for this generation, and it looks as though Statham, might be the one to do it.
Transporter 3 was leaps and bounds above the second film, and in most ways, more like the first. The first film, though, is by far the best of the three, and stands up to multiple viewings. This third installment is worth checking out, but I doubt its something you'll be watching over and over again.

Comments (2)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
SCREENWRITER
nice reveiw.
3 years agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
The Cryptkeeper
I'm surprised you gave this movie that many stars. I mean, I was about to kill myself or walk out of the theater. That girl was annoying as hell, due to her terrible acting. The dialogue was just stupid, and that combined dropped Statham's normally good performance. Then when she took those drugs, pissed in the gas station NOT in the bathroom, and told Statham to put on a striptease. I had had it with her. I am not one to talk in theaters, but I was yelling at her, even though I know she couldn't hear me. It was just a horrible movie. I also thought the second was good. I can't believe there are people who like this one more than the second. And that is not an insult, I am just saying that I thought the second was good, and even if you hated the second, I would assume that everyone would think this is worse. But I guess I am wrong here.
This is not an insult. Actually by the reviews you have written so far, you seem pretty knowledgeable when it comes to movies, I am merely stating my opinion.
Even though I disagree as high as possible; good review.
I give this movie a 1 star, just because the action was the only half way good part about the film.
3 years agoby @americanpsychoFlag