Transporter 3: Review By NO NAME

Like I mentioned above the whole concept of him having a bracelet strapped onto him that will explode honestly it sounded like a good idea at the time. Yeah not anymore. Transporter 1 was ok needed some work done. Transporter 2 I didn't even find the point in it. Now they give us this piece of crap. Ok sure it might look like a good time at the movies if your an action junkie. Trust me though it ain't.

Acting sucked big time. Which I think is a shame really because Jason Statham proved to me at least that he can be a good actor and that he is a great actor with the Bank Job. He has had some other good action movies like Lock, Stock , and Two Smoking Barrels, and Crank. But those weren't acting movies thy were just fun to watch. Transporter 1 like I said was ok not bad but needed allot of work done on it and should've spent more time in the editing room. Transporter 2 was pure bull all the way around.

Direction don't even get me started on that. Visuals I guess they were ok doesn't really make a difference in the entirety of the movie. Refering back to the story it does sound good a good idea it really did. But the final product honestly in a way felt like a rip off of Crank in many ways. Firstly there is that whole dilema of him having some kind of problem that either his heart need adrenaline or in this case that his candy bracelet will explode I mean it all has a bunch of similarities between them but yet Crank was a much better picture.

I though the the chick they got for this movie was ok acting once again sucked monkey balls. She was kinda sorta hot so that really didn't affect my decision in whether or not the movies should of been R rated. Overall it was just a complete waste of time and money.

Overall: F