The Incredible Hulk: Review By T.Clark

The Hulk finally proves his worthiness of becoming a blockbuster sensation
  • OVERALL
    4.0
    GREAT
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Visuals
Ang Lee should stick to his gay cowboys.

Don't get me wrong, I liked Lee's Hulk, but in a "Summer of Superheroes," the Hulk finally gets the attention he deserves thanks to a new director in the form of Luis Letterier(Transporter) and a batch of damn good actors to fill the shoes left behind by the terrible casting choices of the past. While I never really picture the Hulk as a superhero, but more as a beast on the run who runs into some adventures on the way, this film proves Hulk's potential for being a major action superhero...even if he does cause a lot of damage in the process.

Letterier's film is what I like to call a "requel"-it's a remake and a sequel. A remake because it's a brand new creative team and cast, and a sequel because it doesn't focus a whole lot on the Hulk's origin because the last film already took up the whole movie explaining it.

The plot is simple and what a Hulk film should be like: Bruce Banner is working at a bottle factory in Brazil when the U.S. army and General Ross get wind of his presence there. Bruce finds himself yet again on the run from the army, who want to harvest the beast inside him as a weapon. Ross brings in Russain soldier Emile Blonsky to help him in his pursuit against Banner, who ultimately becomes the raging Abomination.

Letterier's directing is fast paced and adrenaline pumped, which isn't surprising coming from the director of the Transporter. Where as Lee's film focused on Banner's childhood and his traumatic stress, this version slams on the gas and never lets up. The action sequences are breathtaking and clear, especially Hulk's fight with the Abomination, which, let me warn you, isn't just a five-minute slap fight: it's a full on battle of two goliaths which is fun and fantastic to watch.

While you can clearly separate the CGI from reality, I have to say the effects team did an astounding job bringing the Hulk to life, creating an angrier yet more believable Hulk than the last. The last rendition of the Hulk's physique seemed too fake and this Hulk is more of a cross between the huge comics version, and the smaller Lou Ferigno days.

Speaking of Lou Ferigno, both him and Stan Lee get extended screen time after thier half-assed cameos in the original-Lou even voices the Hulk, and while he doesn't speak a lot, it's worth hearing the famous "Hulk Smash!" line from a true master of smashing. Also speaking of the Ferigno days, the movie makes an effort in adding some touches from the original TV show starring Ferigno and the late Bill Bixby(keep an eye out for him as well). It made me glad to see the filmmakers taking an interest in the show that really created the Hulk's large fan base. Now both fans new and old can enjoy the olden days, as they hear the sad "lonely man" theme song and even the origin story in the beginning credits.

The acting is great also, and when you have an all-star cast like this one, it better be damn good. Ed Norton, who also wrote the script, makes his blockbuster debut and delivers as he always does, completely destroying the performance of his predecessor Eric Bana. However, Bana's portrayal was fine also, and you have to blame the creators of the first Hulk for a story bogged down by conversations about Banner's past.

The same can be said about Liv Tyler's and William Hurt's performance in this version compared to Jennifer Connely's and Sam Elliot's in the first. William Hurt as General Ross brings his character to life and captures the stubborn general perfectly, while Tim Roth creates a perfect Blonsky, being a true badass.

I've heard this movie lacks heart: bullsh*t. This movie has enough heart to make Hannibal Lecter hungry. Hulk's relationship with Betty is even made stronger, and it almost reminds me of Peter Jackson's King Kong: a beast who loves a beautiful women and will demolish anything to protect her.

Also, I'm sure you all know Tony Stark makes an appearance(Downey Jr. is even great for a minute cameo), but there's another critical item that is a key part of Marvel history and plays a huge role in the film. Comic fans and readers alike will know exactly what it is.

In the end, this is the Hulk film fanboy's have been waiting for...and all they needed to do was change EVERYTHING. Bravo to everyone involved for making a true monster out of the Hulk.

AR's score: 4.0 stars(8/10)

Do you like this review?

Comments (29)

  1. T.Clark

    ...I still hate u

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  2. PypeBomb

    I'm sorry AndrewRyan, I again have fallen off of my medication and it has yet again caused my rage to act up. I do apologize. Your review is a very inciteful one that has many great components as well as a wealth of knowledge. This movie was decent although it was not exactly my cup of tea; however I can respect your opinions and do look forward to your next review.

    4 years agoby @ilovetochillFlag

  3. T.Clark

    Thanks narrator.

    And pype, u didn't like this movie? I thought it would be right up ur alley seeing as how u and the hulk have the same IQ

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  4. PypeBomb

    HA ! Gay Cowboys!

    I would have really enjoyed this review if it didn't praise a movie that is 100% Meteor-Sh*t (see Steven King's character in Creep Show). HAHAHA BITCHES!!!

    4 years agoby @pypebombFlag

  5. SpaceCowboy

    Wow! that's quite a review. i can see why you like it so much

    4 years agoby @SpaceCowboyFlag

  6. Flrep07

    Wow.. talk about random stuff...

    4 years agoby @flrep07Flag

  7. Vamp

    Oh well then alright. LOL!!!!!

    4 years agoby @vampire2000Flag

  8. T.Clark

    I was shouting in agreement for that statement u posted lol

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  9. Vamp

    I don't get it. . . . .

    4 years agoby @vampire2000Flag

  10. T.Clark

    BEE-YAW!!

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  11. Vamp

    No such thing as a long review. XD!!!!!

    4 years agoby @vampire2000Flag

  12. T.Clark

    I HAVE THOUGHTS!!!! :)

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  13. Bragg

    I agree Phat Lightning! Lawl.

    4 years agoby @bragg1Flag

  14. Phatlightning

    what I thought was too long was your review... BAM!

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag

  15. T.Clark

    I didn't think it was too long, it was just right. It was fast paced enough where u didn't even notice it

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  16. CapisDead

    After reading your review, I definitely agree with some of your points. Maybe I was orignally too tough on the plot as a Hulk movie should be simple and not soap opery. What did you think of the length though? I thought the film was a little too long and for that simple of a film that 20-30 minutes should have at least been cut out

    4 years agoby @capisdeadFlag

  17. Splatter2010

    well I've always heard if nothing is working then change everything. Great review! I was skeptical as you know at first.... now I'm pretty psyched to see it. I read your review on Ang Lee's Hulk also which I actually never saw. But I think I'd like to check that out just so I can compare. Well done.... keep those reviews coming!

    4 years agoby @mindscapeFlag

  18. Flrep07

    never mind. forget the last comment i just wrote

    4 years agoby @flrep07Flag

  19. Flrep07

    http://www.filmpeek.net/userimages/hulk.jpg

    4 years agoby @flrep07Flag

  20. Flrep07

    sorry, i meant to say that ang lee's hulk looked more real than this one does.

    4 years agoby @flrep07Flag

  21. T.Clark

    I wrote a review for Lee's hulk if ya wanna check it out

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  22. Vamp

    No one said that this Hulk looked more fake than the last one. We say that the last one looked more fake than this one.

    4 years agoby @vampire2000Flag

  23. T.Clark

    It deserves more than a one cuz ang is a great director, but his just didn't feel like a hulk movie. I would give it a 3.5. In fact i might write a review :)

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  24. JR

    agreed but i would give lees hulk a 1

    4 years agoby @supbitchFlag

  25. Vamp

    It sounds like it did, I'm like going mental for this movie, and I liked your reference to Hannibal Lecter, he's one of my favorites. I did enjoy the other hulk, but I agree this Hulk looks much more realistic, whereas the last one looked like a videogame brought into reality, or Gumby on roids as Phatlightning puts it. I always liked Jennifer Connely and Sam Elliot, but it sounds as if Tim Roth and Liv Tyler blew them out of the water in this one. Liv is very good at emotional scenes, she had a part in the movie Armageddon where she has to say goodbye to her father forever, and it is one of the very few movie parts that actually made me outright bawl. Anyway, great review and I look forward to this movie with great anticipation!!!!!

    4 years agoby @vampire2000Flag

  26. T.Clark

    It was better than a 3.5 dude, that's more like lee's hulk. Sorry rad, but this movie kicked all kinds of ass :)

    4 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  27. Radimus-83

    i relly enjoyed the Hulk, but wouldn't give 5/5. maybe 3 or 3.5!
    good review trav, as always. was f*cking sweet "HULK SMASH" lol, great moment!

    4 years agoby @radimus-83Flag

  28. JR

    damn long ass review as always..lol i did like this one a lot it had a lot of action much better than the last one witch was awfull like dog sh*t sticking to youre shoe

    4 years agoby @supbitchFlag

  29. Phatlightning

    nice review, long, again... but good. I'm glad this movie impressed, can't wait to see it.

    4 years agoby @sxers2k1Flag