The Devil Inside: Review By Bryan Yentz
An incomplete picture whose structure is comprised of cinematic theft, THE DEVIL INSIDE became quite lucky with its box office, but has easily solidified itself on not only the list of "Worst Films of the Year", but "Worst Horror Films Ever" as well...
-
OVERALL0.5HORRIBLE
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
As a child, Isabella's mother butchered three people of God during an exorcism. Now older, she hopes to seek out her mother within an asylum and piece together what actually happened that terrifying night. As one would expect, a limp battle between science and religion begins as she, her camera operator and two priests confront supernatural forces with some nasty plans in store for them all.
Before I tear THE DEVIL INSIDE a new one, I will say that it does a handful of things right. For one, there is some hefty potential with its subplot involving priests acting as spiritual mercenaries. Not content to sit on the sidelines and be told by the powers that be, who may be exorcised, two men of the cloth have dedicated themselves to discovering possible possessed beings and relieving them of their troubled spirits. It's a neat idea, but like the majority of the film is utterly undercooked and hardly tapped of its latent qualities.
The possession scenes also offer some decent intensity and grisly imagery to keep one hooked to the screen. Never did I find it at all scary, but several of the effects were commendably done and I was entertained by the blunt creepiness sparingly developed. However, like the plot-point mentioned above, the majority of these "terrifying" moments are ripped straight out of other films which have just come out in recent years. And no, that nostalgic feeling didn't overtake me, the notion of "Wow, you shamelessly stole that idea" did.
So yeah, those are two backhanded compliments for THE DEVIL INSIDE. Unfortunately, those are the only slight positives I can muster for this trashy cash-in. Oh, and the lead actress (Fernanda Andrade) is hot. So yeah. Three slight positives.
The other 95% of THE DEVIL INSIDE is so misguided in its approach and execution that it's downright embarrassing. The "improvised" acting is forced, unbelievable and consists of nothing more than expository dialogue. There's practically no development for any character involved and the attempts at characterization are incredibly shallow and cheap. The adventure itself is so horribly paced that the end credits are purposefully designed to run slower than normal so as to pad out the runtime to just over an hour in length. This is a mockumentary--no, actually, this is just a film. . . A film made by filmmakers without any conception of how a film should even be made. Plot holes never stop spreading, logic is abandoned every second, characters perform one insipid action after another, and to make matters worse, THERE ISN'T EVEN AN ENDING. I sh*t you not. There isn't an ending. At the point in which the film just stops, this would typically be the halfway point for any and every other film. I'm sorry, but when the story begins approaching its main focus--that doesn't mean you slice off the tail and "conclude" with a cheap promotion for your website. At least APOLLO 18 applied a tad more ingenuity in its self-promotion.
It's rare that I attend a screening met with booing by a movie's end, however, THE DEVIL INSIDE managed it quite well. An incomplete picture whose structure is comprised of cinematic theft, THE DEVIL INSIDE became quite lucky with its box office (as I'm sure someone involved with its production made a deal with the devil), but has easily solidified itself on not only the list of "Worst Films of the Year", but "Worst Horror Films Ever" as well. Sadly, a sequel is apparently in the works. Maybe it will just be ending they "forgot" to incorporate in this one. Regardless. . . When it arrives. . . May God have mercy on our souls.

Comments (11)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Bryan Yentz
@ROFLitschristian
Ah, hahaha, I got ya!
4 months agoby @bryanyentzFlag
ROFLitschristian
@bryanyentz LoL, I meant, "Yes. I couldn't agree more and I haven't even seen the film." XD
4 months agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag
Bryan Yentz
And @ROFLitschristian
Umm... Yes... Back at ya?
4 months agoby @bryanyentzFlag
Bryan Yentz
@corey, yeah, I hear that! It'll even most likely hit shelves with an "Unrated Edition!" to try and pad numbers.
4 months agoby @bryanyentzFlag
ROFLitschristian
Yes.
4 months agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag
Corey
@bryanyentz Very true. And yeah, I'm known for rating movies higher than they deserve. Now that The Last Exorcism has been confirmed a sequel, I'm now confident this too will somehow bitch out another film. Straight to the DVD shelf if we're lucky!
4 months agoby @coreyFlag
Bryan Yentz
@kiion,
Thanks, man! Glad I could assist. Yeah, had this not been a screening I would not have bothered to see it. I love horror, but you can only see the same film repackaged so many times. This one however has got to be the laziest of the bunch.
@mclovin,
Thanks, man! And yeah, it was pretty damn funny. Especially because one of the "priests" gave an introduction by candle-light about our souls directly before the film. It might have been more believable had the guy been able to read--he seriously stumbled through every other word of his script. And then, two people--and elderly woman and an older man--started having these fits behind us in the aisle--like the were possessed. At a certain point, they started moaning as well... Turns out they just had mental disorders... Why someone brought them to a theater and let them stand and moan for half of the film is beyond me... Especially because I was laughing at first... I mean, I thought they came with the priest... Oh, well...
@corey, again, thanks, bud! More than hald-a-star? Haha, well that was noble of you. I think it had more potential than it let on, but the entire project reeked of cash-grab. I mean, scene-for-scene they were trying to rip off recent flicks like PARANORMAL ACTIVITY: 3, and THE LAST EXORCISM.
Thanks fore reading, everyone!
4 months agoby @bryanyentzFlag
Corey
@bryanyentz Great stuff here, man. I'm the only guy on the site who didn't give this half a star. I still didn't like the film though. As always, excellent review.
4 months agoby @coreyFlag
kiion
This review is awesome, and thank Christ I read it. Saw the trailer and it looked interesting. Now been told its drizzle has made me change my mind, will probs wait now to a bargain bin ٟ pound job. Thanks for warning me. Much appreciated.
4 months agoby @kiionFlag
Lord McLovin of MovieWeb
@bryanyentz I'm just lol at the the fact that they had "Vatican Priests" attending the screening! How hard was it for you not to laugh? haha, anyway good review!
4 months agoby @ghostmanFlag
Bryan Yentz
Hey, Ya'll!
I saw this at a pre-screening a few weeks back (one which even housed fake priests from the Vatican praying for our souls), but I just took the time to do a review for it.
@bawnian-dexeus @ChiRep-1 @comicbookfan @corey @dan1 @daveactor7 @diaigma @ejk1 @fanboy @forrestgump1 @Ilikepie202 @Georgia-DiPirro @ghostman @grond29 @harveycritic @insertusernamehere @jakn @jayaottley @jptheredskull @julianroman @justice-kowaleski @k-man @mattbierwagen @moviegeek @moviefreak97 @moviemaniac66 @moviewiz001 @narrator @pjwolsker @ROFLitschristian @sardinas @SherlockHolmes2009 @skywise @slysnide @SpaceCowboy @stoned @summit10 @TheDarkJoker @thedude-abides @TheFury @themime @wichitagalzl @XxNickTheFilmCriticXx @Zak-F @zender @corey
4 months agoby @bryanyentzFlag