67%
MovieWeb:   0 reviews
6%
RottenTomatoes:   50 reviews
  • Owen Gleiberman Entertainment Weekly (Top Critic)
    9
    How on earth, or anywhere else, did director Ron Underwood manage to blow $100 million on this?
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Wesley Morris Boston Globe (Top Critic)
    A film made with as little wit, interest, and professionalism as artistically possible for a slummy Hollywood caper flick.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Philip Wuntch Dallas Morning News (Top Critic)
    9
    An air of desperation hovers over each episode of the incoherent story line.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Robert K. Elder Chicago Tribune (Top Critic)
    38
    It might be the first sci-fi comedy that could benefit from a Three's Company-style laugh track.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • J. R. Jones Chicago Reader (Top Critic)
    Another zillion-dollar dud.
    Full Review » 5 years ago
  • Robert Koehler Variety (Top Critic)
    This ill-conceived and expensive project winds up looking like a bunch of talented thesps slumming it.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Kevin Courrier Globe and Mail (Top Critic)
    25
    A limp Eddie Murphy vehicle that even he seems embarrassed to be part of.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Frank Scheck Hollywood Reporter (Top Critic)
    Even Murphy's expert comic timing and famed charisma can't rescue this effort.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Christy Lemire Associated Press (Top Critic)
    It's boring. It's flat. It's ugly. Worst of all for a comedy, it's not even remotely funny.
    Full Review » 5 years ago
  • Urban Cinefile Critics Urban Cinefile
    It's a real turkey.
    Full Review » 4 years ago
  • Mark Halverson Sacramento News & Review
    20
    An abundance of noise, explosions, gunplay, chases, special effects, futuristic eye candy and star power (including John Cleese, Pam Grier and Peter Boyle) generates very little pure fun or excitement in this cluttered visit to the moon.
    Full Review » 4 years ago
  • Time Out
    Some diverting cameos, but Murphy struggles to keep this one grounded.
    Full Review » 5 years ago
  • Stefan Birgir Stefansson sbs.is
    38
    worst futurama rip-off ever
    Full Review » 5 years ago
  • Nick Rogers State Journal-Register (Springfield, IL)
    25
    The movie is set in 2087, or approximately 100 years after scribe Neil Cuthbert last bothered to touch up his script.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • Scott Russon Empire Magazine
    20
    This is another dud to add to Murphyis already turkey-laden CV.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • Pablo Villaca Cinema em Cena
    60
    Longe de ser o desastre que muitos anunciaram, o filme funciona como uma aventura descompromissada (mas nao como comedia) - e merece creditos ao menos por sua direcao de arte e pelos bons efeitos visuais.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • John R. McEwen Film Quips Online
    60
    ...Another mediocre notch in Eddie Murphy's spotty career.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • Scott Weinberg eFilmCritic.com
    60
    Kinda sad that this endearingly strange flick will be remembered as one of the "worst ever", yet XXX is considered a good movie because it was profitable.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • John J. Puccio DVDTown.com
    40
    I broke a smile once toward the end of the film.... I won't tell you where.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • Clint Morris Moviehole
    50
    As much of a good idea as Pluto Nash might have been, it's execution is far less engaging.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Josef Braun Vue Weekly (Edmonton, Canada)
    What happened with Pluto Nash? How did it ever get made?
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • David Nusair Reel Film Reviews
    63
    Though my expectations for the film were exceptionally low, it turns out that The Adventures of Pluto Nash is just diverting enough to recommend it.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Ethan Alter Film Journal International
    It's everything you don't go to the movies for.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Danny Graydon BBC
    20
    This is a fudged opportunity of gigantic proportions -- a lunar mission with no signs of life.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Garth Franklin Dark Horizons
    20
    A sparkling but cold and lifeless chunk of rock which is best left forgotten.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
Have you seen this Movie?
It's currently not in your ranks
Rank

Do you like The Adventures Of Pluto Nash?

AVG. RATING 3.2 WORTHY
Rate This
!
3 people have rated this Movie
  • 5 Star:
    0%
  • 4 Star:
    1
    34%
  • 3 Star:
    1
    34%
  • 2 Star:
    1
    34%
  • 1 Star:
    0%
  • 0 Star:
    0%
  • User Lists7
  • Comments0
Fans of this Movie (0)
No one is a fan yet. Become a Fan.