Superman Returns: Review By Lg85bhc
Sad start to a new franchise
-
OVERALL3.0WORTHY
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
He made his first mistake starting the franchise as a continuation of the previous films, which most of the younger crowd has never seen the old Superman films, just becuase he had some child moment in a theater with his mom and basically just wanted to recreate that film. The film should have reintroduced Superman to a new age with a totally new Superman and not, "I am going to try and get a Christopher Reeves look alike because he was the only Superman." As a big Superman fan, Superman is more than just an actor who portrayed him more than 30 years ago, no matter how sad what happened to Chris was. Superman is a legacy, an icon, a character that goes farther than one person and it was time for a new look for a new age.
Second, why a kid? I dont think I even need to say any more. This new film left audiences in confusion, especially those that never saw a Superman movie before.
It is sad really. Warner Bros. had a big opportunity to take the most famous superhero of all time and turn it into a real money maker also, but because of Brian Singer's sad atempt to do...something...who knows when we will see another Superman movie. Most likely a few years after Justice League.
Do you like this review?
Lg85bhc's Reviews (2)
No TV reviews yet.
No DVD reviews yet.

Comments (2)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
The Anarchist
Dude, I'm totally with you on this!
4 years agoby @dr-manhattanFlag
Outlaw122779
I agree with you 100 percent it could of been much better and they should reintroduced the character. Also they should of left the kid out at least until like the last movie or something. How do you feel about Justice League the movie? I have mixed emotions
4 years agoby @outlaw122779Flag