Stardust: Review By Dan
A philosopher once asked, "Are we human because we gaze at the stars, or do we gaze at them because we are human?" Pointless, really... "Do the stars gaze back?" Now *that's* a question
-
OVERALL4.0GREAT
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
Directed By: Matthew Vaughn
Cast: Charlie Cox, Claire Danes, Michelle Pfeiffer, Robert DeNiro, Sienna Miller, Mark Strong, Peter O' Toole
Epic Narration By: Ian McKellen.
I'll start by probably angering a few folks, but I was never the biggest fan of The Princess Bride. I give it it's due respect because of it's wide appeal and it's status as a classic, but I don't attribute the same level of greatness to it as others do. Why do I bring up that movie, when this review is about Stardust? Because they seem to be in that same class, of medieval fantasy/comedy, and have similar themes, only Stardust is infinitely more appealing. Though hearing the lines "Inconceivable!" and "Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die." is funny the first couple times, after a while it just became grating to me, like beating a dead horse. Stardust doesn't suffer repeat jokes such as those, and it is for the better. Honestly, this was easily the hidden gem of summer 2007, and I'm thoroughly surprised it's not talked about more often.
Adapted from acclaimed author Neil Gaiman's novel of the same name, Stardust manages to avoid becoming overly sappy at any given time, in thanks to Vaughn's comedic timing. I began watching this film expecting to feel my eyelids starting to feel like a million pounds and becoming drowsy the way I did from Princess Bride (a heterosexual male can only take so much obnoxiously cornball romance before being lulled to sleep). Thankfully, this never occurred, as the moments that the inevitable sap does occur, they are inundated and cut short by constant humor (such as the dead princes who simply watch how the events unfold in the story, injecting their sarcasm at the right times, or people being turned into goats or goats turned into people, but still acting like goats). So, in other words, Stardust treads that line between appealing to lovesick girls and heterosexual guys just fine, a feat I didn't agree that Bride did as well.
Though it's always good to see Michelle Pfeiffer in anything (she still has my heart with her portrayal of Catwoman, and she's definitely a milf), she plays the evil witch Lamia wonderfully, the actor who really surprised me had to be Robert DeNiro. I've grown up with this image of DeNiro as this hard ass, take no sh*t kind of guy (Goodfellas, Casino, Raging Bull, Godfather Part II, etc), and it's laugh out loud inducing to see him playing the gay sky pirate Captain Shakespeare. It goes against everything I've come to expect from the guy, and I loved that. He's taken a lot of forgettable, downright loathsome roles this past decade (looking at you, Meet the Parents trilogy), but Stardust was a great example of him playing against type and obviously having a ball doing so. I don't believe we'll ever see a cross dressing, queer dancing DeNiro ever again, so kudos to Vaughn getting that out of him. It's interesting how Vaughn manages to get memorable roles out of DeNiro and Nicolas Cage (Kick-Ass), and it frustrates me at the same time, because it proves they are much more capable then the dreck they've both been in in the past 10 or so years.
Our lovelorn hero, Tristan (Cox) and star turned literal human Yvaine (Danes) also had better chemistry then I thought they would. The last time I saw Claire Danes in something was Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, and while I loved the final 20 minutes of that film, everything before that was mediocre and too silly for a Terminator film, so it left a somewhat negative impression of her in my mind. But, she redeems herself here, as she gives Tristan a hard time throughout instead of acting like a lovesick puppy, and I appreciated the bonding sequence they had aboard Shakespeare's flying pirate ship (where they literally try to capture lightning in a bottle :P). Though I'm not familiar with Cox's work, his transformation from bumbling but earnest fool to dashing, skilled hero was believable enough.
And surprisingly, the special effects are quite decent. Whenever Lamia casts a spell on someone or something, you can see that $70 million budget at work. While a lot of hocus pocus is used, *spoiler* I felt the stand out sequence had to be a reanimated Mark Strong being controlled by Pfeiffer, fighting Charlie Cox. Not only was it an inventive battle, but it's laced with great humor as Strong's brothers (and himself), watch from the afterlife, reacting to the fight. I've always found voodoo to be creepy stuff, and that was quite the treat. There were plenty of other moments that had me laughing and thinking "what the f*ck, haha" such as when a man is transformed into a woman, but when he speaks, he still has that male voice, or another person's voice changed to a bird's. It sounds stupid, I know, but in the context of the film, it's brilliant with it's timing.
Not an Oscar winning feature by any means, but one should not overlook this well paced, memorable little film. It's charming enough to keep your undivided attention for it's barely over 2 hour runtime, and I'm willing to bet you'll walk away from it more satisfied then you might have previously believed. Underrated? Most definitely.
Grade: B+

Comments (27)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
skywise
Great review as always, like i said somewhere else i found the movie mostly forgettable but to be honest i was a little distracted when watching it and because i loved the book so much.
Damn i should give you a thumbs down for that Princess Bride remark...that actualy stung a little.
1 year agoby @skywiseFlag
Worth5Bucks
@dan1 just watched this film, it was worth it for robert dinero and mark strong, and ian mckellens epic narration :)
1 year agoby @mattbierwagenFlag
ParkWilliams
@Zak-F I've read the novel and seen the movie, and while the book is definitely better I found the movie very enjoyable as well. It's a great throwback to classic fantasy with a great visual style and great characters.
1 year agoby @azadorFlag
Dan
@slysnide You guys can hate all you want, but I loved this, so :P to you.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
slysnide
@dan1: Inconcievable!!!!!!! Oh uh, wait we're not going down that road. cough*Wallace Shawn Rules*cough
I too heard bad things about this film. Sounds a lot better, but still far off. But DeNiro as a gay cross dresser seems to be the film's diamond in the rough. ;)
1 year agoby @slysnideFlag
Dan
@Zak-F Really? Cuz I haven't read the novel. Oh well, I still enjoyed the hell out of it.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
Bane. Ferguson
@dan1 it was not a flop, but i think Daveactor7 wishes it was, as i do, honestly i really disliked this film. It is nothing like the dark adult novel
1 year agoby @Zak-FFlag
Dan
@daveactor7 True, you're not a Celluloid. You tend to like a lot of good movies. So you're forgiven for this trespass :P
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
J. David
Completely Agreed. Great Review
1 year agoby @moviefreak97Flag
Diaigma
Ah. Personal taste rather than technical. Gotcha :P
1 year agoby @diaigmaFlag
Daveactor7
Still didnt like it :P but we all have our tastes. However Iam no @Celluloid
1 year agoby @daveactor7Flag
Diaigma
A financial flop at 5 million short of doubling production budget. 76% is decent, but it's more like a 90% for me :P
1 year agoby @diaigmaFlag
Dan
@daveactor7 138 Fresh reviews vs 44 rotten. 76%. Again, not a flop.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
Dan
@daveactor7 Budget: 70 million. Gross revenue: 135 million. Not really a flop commercially, nor critically in my opinion. Just underrated.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
Daveactor7
Nice review sir! However I felt this movie was a flop
1 year agoby @daveactor7Flag
Dan
@mattbierwagen No problem, dude.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
Worth5Bucks
@dan1 thank you so much. ive literally been pending on whether or not to see this movie for two years now, now i finally have an opinion from a male, thank you. Just added it to my queue.
1 year agoby @mattbierwagenFlag
The Narrator: The Better Man
Great review and film. Definitely a surprise for me when I first saw it, and it still hasn't lost it's appeal.
1 year agoby @narratorFlag
Dan
@diaigma It's one chick flick I'm not afraid to say I thoroughly enjoyed.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
Diaigma
I'm lovesick over Princess Bride and proud of it :P
Having said that, I like Stardust better. Lot's of guy appeal without alienating the ladies. Perfect date movie :P
1 year agoby @diaigmaFlag
moviegeek
I'd give this a 3.5, but I agree with most everything in your review. It's nice to find someone else who isn't lovesick over the princess bride as well. :P. Super review supes.
1 year agoby @moviegeekFlag
Bawnian©-Dexeus
@dan1 The trailers never really got me to see it back then, though I watched every film that came out .....after reading this, and a really good review , you can bet I'm gonna netflix it ;)
1 year agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag
Summit10
definitely a fan of Neil Gaiman! I like the story for its comedic take and parts on bribing the lovers in the Inn, the murdered Ghost brothers etc...
The song from Take that is quite nice to encompass the movie :)
Btw! Robert De NIro is a no no for this films, he can take comedy (Analyze This and That, The Fockers) but this guy is a mob , gangster, fighter icon in movies not this lame character.
Great work man!
1 year agoby @summit10Flag
Diaigma
I was going to review this one, but recent events have stalled my time for reviewing stuff. In time.
1 year agoby @diaigmaFlag
Dan
@diaigma Correct you were, sir.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
Diaigma
Agreed. A very underrated gem of a film and a fitting review to say the least. I told you you'd enjoy it :)
1 year agoby @diaigmaFlag
Corey
Awesome review, dude. I didn't care too much for The Princess Bride either to tell the honest truth.
1 year agoby @coreyFlag