Saw III: Review By SCREENWRITER

Alright, in 2006 the third installment of the highly succesful series came out and it definatly wasn't better than the first and it was only a little worse than the second. BUT, with four stars, I obviously still loved this movie. It's gory, something you need to make a great Saw and horror film and it has good twists, another thing you need in a good Saw film. Yea, I do recommend this third installment. It's cool, entertaining, and enjoyable. I recommend Saw 3.

ACTING:

Donnie Wahlburg sort of returns and others come. Tobin Bell, always amazing as John Kramer, does an excellent job in his performence, as usual. Some of the performences were dry and a little dull BUT the acting was alright. I didn't have too much to complain about.

VISUALS:

As long as it's got a lot of gore, then it's got good visuals. This one is gory but I think two was a little bloodier. I was expecting this to be extra bloody since they made they're way to a third installment [seeing this, not knowing there would three more after it!]. Good visuals.

DIRECTION:

The same director as the second installment. The movie is dark, not shaky, and every shot looks fine in this. I cannot complain about the direction.

THE GOOD:

It's a bloody good time and a good sequal!

THE BAD:

A few dry performence and the story-line wasn't as amazing as the plot of the first two, but hey, I can't complan too much, I still love this movie [I love all the Saw's!].

OVERALL:

OVERALL, a fun, bloody horror seqaul If you haven't yet seen this third installment, then I recommend it. It isn't as great as the first two, but it's still good. See it!

THANKS FOR READING!

-SCREENWRITER: THE PUMPKING KING

DON'T FORGET TO CHECK OUT MY HORROR REVIEW FOR THE WHOLE MONTH OF OCTOBER TOMMOROW!

-THANKS!