Salt: Review By Courtney O.

Started getting into it and then it was over.
  • OVERALL
    3.5
    GREAT
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Visuals
Spoilers ahead: Really once the ending came up and it was time for the sequel my interest was piqued. I really had a hard time buying Angelina Jolie's frail physique able to endure all the fighting and stunts. I am well aware that Tom Cruise was the original person for the role, and I think all the action was meant for a man. Sure the camera caught Angelina doing the stunts, but she doesn't have the muscle to make it believable. I don't know, I guess I haven't seen Nikita yet and so that might be the same thing.

As far as the story is concerned, I think the plot was a little predictable, and a big over-the-top explosive. If she is a "good guy" and didn't kill the Russian President, how are we supposed to think that all the people she killed was ok to kill, but as long as she just pretended to kill the Russian Pres then she is an ok person? Like Jack Bauer, if we're talking CIA going rogue here, wouldn't kill innocents at all, whereas Salt kills innocents, saves one person, and is a suddenly the hero of the film. I don't get it.

Do you like this review?

Comments (4)

  1. Abdulsamad Nizamani

    hahhahah very nice great.

    1 year agoby @Abdulsamad-NizamaniFlag

  2. ChuChi

    THANK YOU!!!!!! I BEEN TELLING PEOPLE THE SAME THING... WHOS GONNA BELIEVE A 100LBS SKELETON COULD KICK SOME CIA AGENTS ASSES... NOT TO BELIEVABLE.. WELL FOR ME.. STORY WAS OK BUT THEY SHOULD HAD PICKED A BETTER FIT FEMALE.. GOOD REVIEW GIRL

    1 year agoby @josedrosaFlag

  3. IlikePie202

    never seen it, alright review

    1 year agoby @Ilikepie202Flag

  4. Brian

    Good review Ocrank. I agree on all levels. 3.5 might be a little high though!

    1 year agoby @brianFlag