'Quantum of Solace' Review By Structure (ONSTRA)

As I stared to the screen watching this movie, I was amazed by the action. yet the story was still not as impressive as Casino Royal.
  • OVERALL
    3.5
    GREAT
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Visuals
The James bond series amazed our eyes many times and gave us the ability to look at the detective that took the eyes of everyone by his action. After the amazing masterpiece, Casino royal, that made it impossible for anyone to forget Bond, made it impossible for all the fans to wait 2 years till it's sequel comes out. daniel craig got definitely better with the character of the amazing 007 and made you stare at the screen like never before to watch the action that will blow your mind out - al least it did blow mine - i also would like to talk about the caparison between this and its precedore. I really think that casino royal was still better than this sequel but still this one excessed casino royal in some points. I will talk about all of those points that are really intresting since this is the second performance for daniel as Bond, which will mean that it will be important for everyone to know if this held the better preformance for daniel or his first preformance in the mind blowing movie that stole the theaters in 2006, Casino Royal.

As I will start talking about this movie as a great masterpiece, I will tell you that the screen was easily not big enough to show the whole picture in many times. I looked at the screen and many times I saw some action that made me want to scream in the theater: ZOOM OUT... ZOOM OUT. yet of course I didn't. i was really looking forward to this one since like forever. In fact I heard of the making of Quantum When i was going out of the theater when Casino royal ended, so i couldn't be sure If I was pleased that casino royal was good, or really sad that i will be waiting 2 more years till this one comes out. anyways i am pretty sure that everyone knows the story which was not that changeable at the end of the movie like many others. for example there are many movies that change at the end of the movie and gives you a picture of the movie that wasn't shown in the trailer like the movie "click". This one didn't it was mostly the same story in the trailer with some changeable things than didn't really matter that much.

As i wanna start talking about the story, I can tell you that bond is back in a story that was really good. the scenario was good too, yet had less curses than I expected, but gave itself the words that could be easily put in a PG-13 movie. I was really amazed for the fact that the story got itself a better, bigger point. by which i mean that this time it wont be a small organization that sells drugs and sh*t. It is pretty big, and you can notice that by the fact that the movie takes you throughout many countries throughout europe. Bond goes in an adventure that is really cool and has action in every 10 minutes in it. Bond is still looking for revenge from the killer of his last girlfriend in Casino Royal. As he actually finds the guy, he finds with it that there is a very very big organization that seems to be unknown to the people and was so handled secretly that none of the CIA's FBI's or whatever The organization that Bond is in - Sorry for the fact but the name didn't seem to get to my head while i was writing the review- and of course is the time for bond to get in the mission to save the world again and avenge himself for his girl thaat died in the last movie. As daniel gets himself stuck in this situation under the name of James Bond, he seems to get the hold of this charachter. he actually did a very very good job bringing the chanacter to life in this movie. he actually gets hold of the character even more than the previous movie. well it would be easy to do it again after he saw himself as bond in the first one. this thing always happen with movies that have sequels, the actor always get better and in this one, it seems to prove this theory even more and more. i actually liked him as bond and he made me feel like he got better with the character and is making me hope for more and more in the next bond movie if there will be any of them. good job daniel.

As he gets in the mission trying to find the guy and the organization, he meets a girl that suddenly, for no reason, and for no kind of any reasonable theory, or anything like that tells him to get into her car. suddenly, she seems to be one of the people who helped the organization in a way or another. her name was Camille and She was played by Olga Kurylenko - I think I spelled it wrong - which seems to know what her job is. BOND GIRL. obviously. she is one of the hottest bond girls that lived and i am pretty sure of that. when everyone was in the theater and saw her of course there was lots of those annoying voices made by those douches that likes to go into the theater only to make out. but at the end, she was pretty hot and you can't say no, I am pretty sure that if you read this review, in fact if you are living on this planet earth and know that i am talking about the girl that was in the cover, you will definitely, know how hot she is. I think that she kinda broke the record because she had easily the best lips ever made. her eyes were really cool especially when she looks at the camera, because obviously, if you were sitting in the theater, you will be in a position that will make her look at you.

another character I really would like to look at is M. she is supposed to be one of the strongest women living on earth in the bond world and she kinda is. especially that Judi Dench kinda knows how to put her character in act. she made the character work like you never have seen it before.

As i talked through the story and everything, I made you see the actors and the story at the same time. I still wanna talk about the fact that the story of casino royal was deffinitely better than this one, for many reasons. but still this was one of the best bond moveis I've seen in a while. I really wanna talk about the visuals too. as the visuals of the movie gets tied with those of casino royal, you can see the fact that the use of the airplanes was not put in the previous movie, yet used in an amazing was throughout this one. also we see people jumping in and out of buildings which gave it amazing effects that you can look at. At the end it really had amazing effects that can blow your mind off.

As my review gets to it's end, i see that James bond had made it again in a movie so blowing, so amazing, and so touchy - lol- that you will never get to say no to. It had really good visuals and the story was okk, but the acting was surely better than the acting in the casino royal movie, but the difference is slightly noticed. well cya soon for reviews of many other movies. and I am still going to be here to review the next bond movie i am waiting for right now.

Do you like this review?

Comments (19)

  1. Structure (ONSTRA)

    thanks rose. i'll try my best about making my reviews unnoveletty. LOL. JKJK. anyways thanks everybody for the good comments.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  2. rose_dc

    when you commented on my review, i tried to spent sometime to read all your reviews and most of it is too long but I agree with you on this. i'll try my best that next time my review won't be a novelette anymore...

    happy holidays!

    -r

    5 years agoby @rosedcFlag

  3. Structure (ONSTRA)

    thanks, Moviebuzz, it's pretty easy once you get used to it, It actually is really easy. Moviebuzz, all you really need to do is to write about the movie as much as you can. it's really not that hard.
    But thanks alot for your opinion.
    don't worry moviebuzz you'll get there, you really don't wanna see the way i wrote my first review.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  4. moviebuzz411

    omg i wish i can write like you!

    im berly getting to write stuff wich are super little!

    but great review!

    5 years agoby @movie-buzzFlag

  5. Structure (ONSTRA)

    LG you know your opinion matters more than you think and it is important for me to actually reply, thanks for supporting to size of my review. and thanks for your general support.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  6. Structure (ONSTRA)

    Thanks Slysnide, i actually like to write about the review as much as i though the movie was good. and I can fairly tell you that I really think that the review is pretty good at it's size, I mean I don't like being one of those people that actually cut short and say that the movie was good and then that's it. end of the review. I mean f*ck it. either talk about the movie, the way it is and the way you see it or don't write a review at all, I mean people actually write so much shorter review, i am just not that kind you know. Well I can frankly tell you that your reviews are pretty long I think I did check a lot of them. but the longest review i've seen on this movieweb is surely under Vamp 2000's name. that is a sure thing. but really it doesn't matter how long it is, it matters that you put in it whatever you think of the movie. Probably V2K actually starts conversations on his review which is something i wont do, But lots actually do. mabey he doesn't start them it's just that the thing starts and you know you start actually wanna talk about something else. like that gay guy who reviewed Indiana jones "Gayanck" or something like that. people were sending comments to him because he actually was gay, and you know what happened. so it's not only about the review. + it doesn't really matter the comments, I mean like not alot. you know.
    I'll check casino royal: I really don't think I will read the whole thing though. srry.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  7. The Lost Girl

    I like the review and the key points that you added. Also that you add your own personal perspective. Personally, I don't feel that it was too long. Keep up the great work!!

    5 years agoby @trinity7694Flag

  8. slysnide

    This review is short enough. No need to cut it shorter. Just check out my "Casino Royale" review I posted within the last hour. And I'm known for longer reviews, which is probably why my latest reviews haven't been getting comments, but V2K's are longer and get plenty attention. lo1!

    Nice review. I'll be giving it the same rating when I review it come Tuesday, since I saw it yesterday, but am at school all day tomorrow.

    5 years agoby @slysnideFlag

  9. Structure (ONSTRA)

    thanks crypt.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  10. The Cryptkeeper

    great review, that i agree with.

    5 years agoby @americanpsychoFlag

  11. Structure (ONSTRA)

    thanks panda, I guess I really should make them shorter, I got this comment from before.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  12. panda007

    Good review. Try making them a little shorter, though. It's a review, not a summary.

    5 years agoby @panda07Flag

  13. Structure (ONSTRA)

    well I am really sorry it's just that I was so excited about the movie I just wanted to talk about it you know. But thanks.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  14. Diaigma

    Jeez, reading this review makes me want to scream. You have a good eye and I agree on most points, but you could have conveyed the same amount of information with three paragraphs, not a novelette. As this, as that...? Get on with it already :P

    5 years agoby @diaigmaFlag

  15. Structure (ONSTRA)

    I just did

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  16. MovieNerd

    Great review. Check out mine.

    5 years agoby @nickoFlag

  17. Structure (ONSTRA)

    srry man I am kinda writing the review right now. because sometimes when you finish writing the review you actually post it and it never posts, so i post every part of it alone.

    But thanks.

    5 years agoby @gaj1992Flag

  18. GK

    good review.

    5 years agoby @indianajonesFlag