Marvel's The Avengers: Forums

- The Avengers 2012 Will Be Completely Awful?
Post Reply
  • 1 year ago
  • I find that they are jumping into it far too quick, and are game for a explosive load of sh*t.
    What is purposeful
  • 1 year ago
    • ejk1
    • @ejk1
    • Joined: July 2009
    • Comments: 6,856
    • MovieWeb God
    Jumping into it far too quick? Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, IM2, Thor, and Cap movies will have been made beforehand. This thing received its beginnings four years before it will be released. While there may be some reasons for nervousness, saying Marvel has jumped the gun is definitely not one of them.
  • 1 year ago
  • Ever since the first Iron Man, the Avengers was already being in development. So I disagree with you
    There exist four rulers in this world: Gods, Humans, Vampires and Werewolves. The Question is, who do you think is above the food chain?
  • 1 year ago
  • hell no. sorry but your wrong @Zak-F
  • 1 year ago
    • CUPID
    • @cupid
    • Joined: September 2007
    • Comments: 6,627
    • MovieWeb God
    WHAT,hell no you've got some of the biggest super heroes right now in it come on man. @Zak-F
    If You Just Do What I Say, We'll Do Fine
  • 1 year ago
    • Corey
    • @corey
    • Joined: February 2011
    • Comments: 6,215
    • MovieWeb God
    ....No.
  • 1 year ago
  • There's a good possibility it could suck. The people above me are in denial. Iron Man 2 was pretty disappointing, Thor looks like a cheese fest, Edward Norton was replaced...but I'm gonna look on the bright side. There's plenty of good things it has going for it.
    I'm a dog chasing cars. I wouldn't know what to do with one if I caught it.
  • 1 year ago
    • ejk1
    • @ejk1
    • Joined: July 2009
    • Comments: 6,856
    • MovieWeb God
    @insertusernamehere I'm not in denial about anything, dude. I just don't think his reason is a reason to think the movie could suck. If you want to get into the reasons why, Whedon's inexperience with big name actors is a reason. But jumping into The Avengers far too quickly? No, sorry, but that is not what happened.
  • 1 year ago
  • @insertusernamehere neither am I, we simply disagree about his comment
    There exist four rulers in this world: Gods, Humans, Vampires and Werewolves. The Question is, who do you think is above the food chain?
  • 1 year ago
  • Yes its possible it could suck majorly, due to a smaller budget (compared to some other big movies), shooting in a studio mostly and a unproven director IMO. But like other said it was a lot more going for than against it, so we will all just have to mind out come May 4th, 2012
  • 1 year ago
  • Joss Whedon is a great character writer and i am vey pleased that he is behind this, i have high hopes...which i know i am just setting myself.
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there ISN'T an invisible demon about to eat your face...
  • 1 year ago
  • Agreed, @skywise . I see no reason this should suck. It's basically the same formula as Buffy (team of heroes) on a much larger scale, and Whedon excels at that dynamic.
  • 1 year ago
    • Dan
    • @dan1
    • Joined: January 2010
    • Comments: 19,686
    • MovieWeb God
    They've been building towards this movie for years with multiple films before it. You couldn't be more wrong dude, in thinking they jumped the gun. I think the way Marvel has played their cards and their strategy has been good, they are developing their universe in a very connected way. Assuming Avengers goes over well (and I'm betting it will, I trust and have faith in Whedon), we've just seen the tip of the iceberg with superhero movies. Those that can't stand them, too bad, they're not going away anytime soon.
    Valar morghulis, Jon Snow. but valar dohaeris.
  • 1 year ago
  • Guys, Guys, i agree on some of the matters, but just to pile out CA and Thor is just ridiculous, they should let those series spring, blossom into something, before just saying "lets get these out so we can set up this huge fiasco of a movie. Initiation: these movies need to have at least two or three released before carting them off to Avengers Camp. Thats all, but also it could be good, possibly i am wrong? maybe these guys can pull it off. Joe Johnston or Kenneth may set the tone and lead up so well we dont need any other sequels to lead it up to a climax, but i find its just a step too quick. But Joss Whedon, what a guy, fairly varied status, but i hope he gives it its authenticity and boldness it deserves.
    What is purposeful
  • 1 year ago
  • @pjwolsker i may seem wrong, but in the context of what im saying is, it seems all these movies just seem to be made for the initiation of this, but not just made for the soul reason of having a Captain America Film or Thor film but to just lead up to this
    What is purposeful
  • 1 year ago
    • Dan
    • @dan1
    • Joined: January 2010
    • Comments: 19,686
    • MovieWeb God
    @Zak-F I get what you're saying, you want more time built up for each character individually before making the transition into a team movie. It's not an invalid objection, one I'd be okay with if that was the route they went with. But, things are happening the way they are, so let's go along for the ride, eh?
    Valar morghulis, Jon Snow. but valar dohaeris.
  • 1 year ago
  • @dan1 you have summed up precisely what i meant
    What is purposeful
  • 1 year ago
  • @dan1 well its happening, and i admire Whedon completely, he has a small track record, and he is taking it upon himself to do this, and possibly it will be a cinematic orgy.
    What is purposeful
  • 1 year ago
  • @cupid i am slightly adamant, but i am slowly grasping the leash
    What is purposeful
  • 1 year ago
    • ejk1
    • @ejk1
    • Joined: July 2009
    • Comments: 6,856
    • MovieWeb God
    @Zak-F The only problem with what you want is that it would take too much time. If we wait for each character to get two films, then we'd have to wait two to four years from now to even get started on The Avengers. We would need a second Cap, Thor, and Hulk, all at the same time hoping that people don't forget about Iron Man, unless he gets a third movie (which will add even more time). Instead of The Avengers in 2012, it would be 2018 at best. I don't think anyone wants to wait around that long--where comics can afford to take time and cultivate stories thanks to the monthly releases, movies do not have that option. Good films take years to develop, which is what Marvel has done with The Avengers. And we really can't ask them to wait, not when the iron has never been as hot as it is at this moment.