-
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
story was not bad, better than i thought since i wasn't expecting much from this movie. i was definitely interested in the movie after the first 5-10 minutes. The acting was good but i think Cory Feldman's character was retarded, it worked for the first movie because he was only 16 or 17 at the time so it worked. but for a 36 year old man to play the same part and still act out a character thats like the same 16 yr old was just stupid. not cory feldman's fault though just bad directing. Visuals for the vampires sucked because it was a completely different looking vampire compared to the first movie so they didn't stay true to the original.
Comments (1)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
ed_wood
The vampires had evolved since the original, and Feldmans character was awesome. Why would he play the part differently than before?
4 years agoby @ed-woodFlag