Little Fockers: Review By DabbaDabba

Jan 6th, 2011 by DabbaDabba
Worst movie in theatres
  • OVERALL
    1.0
    HORRIBLE
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Visuals
What a STINK BOMB! Obviously, it was a money grab for everyone connected, and well planned-coming out a Chrismas, Focker franchise, stars. But there wont be another Focker film as the name has been ruined with this loser. There was nothing redeemable about this movie; it was pathetic. The worst one I have seen in a long time. I feel like I was taken for a sucker, which I guess we all were that went, and were expecting a good showing. Just goes to show you - always read the reviews FIRST!

Do you like this review?

Comments (2)

  1. DabbaDabba

    Story was so bad, even decent acting couldn't get any traction. Dustin Hoffman was quite bad, as was Streisand. And Harvey Keitel - what was that about? Like they started to develop him as a character, and then just dropped it. Best acting was by the little girl. Pacing was OK, but the goal seemed to be just get to the end and the struggle to complete the film would be over. Jokes? Relied on sophomoric sex oriented jokes to get laughs. Nothing really funny about it.

    2 years agoby @DabbaDabbaFlag

  2. Dan

    What was bad about it? How was the acting? What was the story about? What did you think about the pacing? Were any of the jokes funny?

    2 years agoby @dan1Flag