Lions for Lambs: Review By Moviemaster75

"Lions For Lambs" was a big dissapointment for me and I think everybody else that say it. Robert Redford has made a HUGE mistake on this. Could have been better and it's definetly NOT what you think it is.

Politics... no

War... no

Drama... no

WTF?... YES! ding ding ding!

Pointless... YES!1 ding ding ding!

A horrible film not to see. Clearly fake visuals, Story pointless. Acting was so-so. Directing terrible. I don't know how or why this got even a budget. On the bright side the only thing i had acually liked was the acting, Robert Redford, Tom Cruise, and Marly Streep (i dont know how to spell it) that was the only good thing about this because i gotta say it has talented actors.

Story pointless, how do you live jumoing like 500 feet from a helicpoter while getting shot at and live? Thats just dumb and pointless. Well thats where it takes place, Iraq in the snow where two dumbass soldiers only fight for about 3 minutes and they call this a war movie? Why?

Directing was well... terrible very very terrible, I havent seen Redford in a more horrible movie than this and hopefully never will. The title made it sound interesting and the trailer well the action you saw in it was the only action there was at all.

Visuals poor, you can really tell that it's Green Screen or some lowsy sh*t or something, very pridictable too. Very disturbing for that too the visuals were the worst, but the main question was... How did those soldiers survive jumoing out of a helicopter 500 feet without a parachute and only break a leg?

A thumbs down movie... don't see this one.