'Jack the Giant Slayer' Review By Julian Roman

The CGI effects and tepid intro will probably bore older viewers, but if you let yourself get into the story, then you're in for a decent time.
  • OVERALL
    3.0
    WORTHY
  • Story
  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Visuals
Warner Brothers and director Bryan Singer take on medieval fantasy in the CGI adventure, Jack the Giant Slayer. Based on the popular English folk tale, Jack and the Beanstalk, insert "fee-fi-fo-fum" here; the film adds a few twists that make up for a rather drab first act. Nicholas Hoult stars as earnest farm boy Jack, who's given a simple task of selling an old horse and cart at the market. Jack ends up saving the honor of Isabel (Eleanor Tomlinson), a disguised princess sick of societal constraints. He also procures a sack of magic beans from a friar on the run from Isabel's dastardly betrothed, Sir Roderick (Stanley Tucci). Destined by fate, Jack and Isabel meet again that night when Isabel seeks shelter at his lonely farm. Sparks really begin to fly when one of Jack's magic beans falls under the floorboard. It erupts into a massive beanstalk that whisks Isabel and the house into the heavens. The King (Ian McShane) orders Roderick, Jack, and his chief guard, Elmont (Ewan McGregor), to take some men, climb the beanstalk, and rescue his daughter from wherever the beanstalk ends.

My first issue with Jack the Giant Slayer is the beginning. The film starts off with a montage that explains the lore of the giants and then falls steadily downhill after that. I felt like I was watching sequences from a video game as the plot slowly leaks out. The story gets better when the ancillary characters, particularly Ewan McGregor's Elmont and Stanley Tucci's Roderick, become more meaningful. Hoult is fine as the doe-eyed Jack, but he doesn't have any presence to carry the huge action scenes that fill the climax. McGregor does a fine job of being the muscle, resplendent in armor and almost as swashbuckling as his Obi Wan days. Couple his performance with Tucci's vile smugness and we finally have some entertainment going. I'd bet the filmmaker's beefed up the supporting characters during editing to make the film more of an ensemble piece.

The film is effects heavy with wall to wall CGI. Honestly, I was not impressed at first, but changed my tune once the massive action scenes kick in. Darren Lemke's screenplay builds up to a wide array of action, from one on one combat to an all out castle siege. The effects I perceived as too unrealistic at first look much better as the conflicts heat up. I'm not sure if I just got used to what I was seeing, or became more enthralled by the scope of the action. Either way, I ended up liking the film much more because the ending was so well done. Bryan Singer is no stranger to the big pay off ending, so he brings his skill here to resurrect a flailing story halfway through. I saw Jack the Giant Slayer in IMAX 3D, so it's all the more engrossing in the large screen formats.

Jack the Giant Slayer is fairly intense and warrants its PG-13 rating. Numerous characters are killed, eaten, or smashed to a pulp by rampaging giants. In this sense it's not really a movie meant for younger kids. It is a new take on a known fairy tale, but is probably too graphic for small children. The CGI effects and tepid intro will probably bore a few older viewers, but if you let yourself get into the story, then you're in for a decent time. Jack the Giant Slayer is worth the extra dough for the 3D and IMAX, just make sure you hit the bathroom and snack counter in the first hour.

Do you like this review?

Comments (4)

  1. T. King (Red Camera Man)

    @julianroman: I'll still see this movie though since it not only looked fun from the previews, but also because I'm a big fan of Bryan Singer's work. Good review, nonetheless. :-)

    2 years agoby @redcameramanFlag

  2. jasdjqs

    Thanks for the review , I will go see it now.

    2 years agoby @jasdjqsFlag

  3. Julian Roman

    @bawnian-dexeus, how goes it dude? I totally agree, the 3d and IMAX prices are crazy. But I totally think a film like this is worth shelling out for 3d. There's no doubt sequels are coming if it does well. I think the budget was near $200 mil so it's huge. The film gets much better towards the end. Ewan McGregor owns this film.

    2 years agoby @julianromanFlag

  4. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    I hate how the only IMAX near my area doesn't offer two auditoriums to give us the chance to see it in either 2D or 3D. Bastards and their "In 3D, Real 3D and IMAX 3D" tags.

    Anyways, the studio is really putting some faith with this big budget project. If their intention is to create a global film franchise, they are going to have a hard time if all the giants die. What's next? Jack the Midget Stomper?

    Good review my good man

    2 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag